AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (738.9 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Evaluation of coordinated development of regional resources and economy around Shandong Peninsula urban agglomerations

Na LI1Kui-feng WANG2( )
Shandong Xiehe University, Jinan 250109, China
Shandong Institute of Geological Sciences, Shandong Key Laboratory of Geological Process and Resource Utilization in Metallic Minerals, Key Laboratory of Gold Mineralization Process and Resource Utilization Subordinate to the Ministry of Land and Resource, Jinan 250013, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Promoting coordinated development of resources and environment is an important aspect of building a harmonious society and ecologically sustainable civilization. Here we provide scientific basis to promote the development of ecologically sensitive civilization, via a mathematical statistics method that calculates the degree of coordinated development. This model is of great practical and social significance, providing strength to research around coordinated development of resources and economy. Based on evaluation of characteristics of the present resource environment and economic development of Shandong Peninsula city group, a coordinated measure of resource environment and economic development was calculated. Overall, the highest coordination measurement was found for Weihai, followed by Yantai, Qingdao, Ji’nan, Weifang, Rizhao, Zibo and Dongying. According to evaluation results of coordination measures for each city, we put forward suggestions for sustainable development of Shandong Peninsula region.

References

 

Amirian E, Leung J Y W, et al. 2014. An integrated application of cluster analysis and artificial neural networks for SAGD recovery performance prediction in Heterogeneous Reservoirs. Calgary: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 10–12.

 

HAN Shen-chen, CHEN Chia-yon, et al. 2014. The construction and application of a carrying capacity evaluation model in a national park. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28(6): 1333–1341.

 
HU Jin-tao. 2012. Unswervingly follow the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive to build a moderately prosperous society in an all-round way. Beijing: The 18th Communist Party of China National Congress.
 

JIANG Hong-li, HE Jian-min. 2010. The dynamic coupling model of coordinated development between regional economic and ecological environment systems based Jiangsu Province. Soft Science, 24 (3): 63–68.

 

JlNG Zhou-wei, MA You-hua, et al. 2014. Research on resources and environmental carrying capacity. Agricultural Science & Technology, 15(10): 1789–1792.

 

LIAO Chong-bin. 1999. Quantitative evaluation and classification system of coordinated development between environment and economy: A case study of the urban agglomeration in the Pearl River Delta. Tropical Geography, 19(2): 171–177.

 

Mutisya E, Yarime M. 2014. Moving towards urban sustainability in Kenya: A framework for integration of environmental, economic, socia and governance dimensions. Sustainability Science, 9(2): 205–215.

 

Rehman K, Burton P W, Weatherill G A. 2014. K-means cluster analysis and seismicity partitioning for Pakistan. Journal of Seismology, 18(3): 1–19.

 

REN Zhi-yuan, XU Qian, YANG Ren. 2011. On coordination development of agricultural ecological environment and economy in Shaanxi Province based on coupling degree model. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 25(12): 14–19.

 

Tretyakova E A. 2014. Assessing sustainability of development of ecological and economic systems: A dynamic method. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 25(4): 423–430.

 
United Nations. 1992. Rio Declaration-United Nations Conference on environment and development.
 

WANG Hai-ning, XUE Hui-feng. 2012. Quantitative analysis of coordination between groundwater environment and socioeconomic development. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(12): 234–237.

 

WANG Kui-feng, LI Na, et al. 2014a. Ecoenvironmental carrying capacity evaluation index system based on the concept of P-S-R model-A case study in Shandong Peninsula. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 34(8): 2133–2139.

 

WANG Kui-feng, LI Na, et al. 2014b. The construction and application of the index system of eco-environmental crrying capacity in Shandong Peninsula. Geology in China, 41(3): 1018–1027.

 

WANG Kui-feng, HAN Xiang-yin, ZHANG Tai-ping. 2015. The construction and application index system of geo-environmental crrying capacity in Shandong Peninsula. Environmental Pollution and Control, 37(9): 29–33.

 

WANG Hong-qi, TIAN Ya-nan, et al. 2013. Resource and environmental carrying capacity based on set pair analysis in inner mongolia. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 49(z1): 292–296.

 

Rees W, Wackernagel M. 2008. Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainableand why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4): 537–555.

 

Yoo I T, Kim I. 2015. Free trade agreements for the environment? Regional economic integration and environmental cooperation in East Asia. Intmiational Environmental Agreement, 1–18.

 

ZHANG Ying-xuan, CHEN Wen-hua, et al. 2010. Evaluating Beijing’s human carrying capacity from the perspective of water resource constraints. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(8): 1297–1304.

 

ZHANG Zi-long, CHEN Xing-peng, et al. 2010. Dynamic changes of the relationships between economic growth and environmental pressure in Gansu Province a structural decomposition analysis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(2): 429–433.

Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Pages 220-228
Cite this article:
LI N, WANG K-f. Evaluation of coordinated development of regional resources and economy around Shandong Peninsula urban agglomerations. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2016, 4(3): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2016.9280026

364

Views

13

Downloads

4

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Published: 28 September 2016
© 2016 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office
Return