AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Article
PDF (5.4 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Influence of underground space development mode on the groundwater flow field in Xiong’an new area

Yi-hang Gao1,2,3, Jun-hui Shen2,3( ), Lin Chen4( ), Xiao Li4, Shuang Jin5, Zhen Ma1, Qing-hua Meng1
Tianjin Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300000, China
State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
College of Environment and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
Shenyang Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, China
Fifth Geological Brigade, Hebei Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The degree and scale of underground space development are growing with the continuous advancement of urbanization in China. The lack of research on the change of the groundwater flow field before and after the development of underground space has led to various problems in the process of underground space development and operation. This paper took the key development zone of the Xiong’an New Area as the study area, and used the Groundwater modeling system software (GMS) to analyse the influence on the groundwater flow field under the point, line, and surface development modes. The main results showed that the underground space development would lead to the expansion and deepening of the cone of depression in the aquifer. The groundwater level on the upstream face of the underground structure would rise, while the water level on the downstream face would drop. The “line” concurrent development has the least impact on the groundwater flow field, and the maximum rise of water level on the upstream side of the underground structure is expected to be approximately 3.05 m. The “surface” development has the greatest impact on the groundwater flow field, and the maximum rise of water level is expected to be 7.17 m.

Keywords

Xiong’an new areaGroundwater flow fieldUnderground spaceGMS

References

 

Attard G, Rossier Y, Eisenlohr L. 2017. Underground structures increasing the intrinsic vulnerability of urban groundwater: Sensitivity analysis and development of an empirical law based on a groundwater age modelling approach. Journal of Hydrology, 552: 460−473. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.013.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Attard G, Winiarski T, Rossier Y, et al. 2016. Review: Impact of underground structures on the flow of urban groundwater. Hydrogeology Journal, 24: 5−19. DOI:10.1007/s10040-015-1317-3.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Bobylev N. 2009. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: A case of Urban Underground Space use. Land Use Policy, 26: 1128−1137. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Borgia A, Cattaneo L, Marconi D, et al. 2011. Using a MODFLOW grid, generated with GMS, to solve a transport problem with TOUGH2 in complex geological environments: The intertidal deposits of the Venetian Lagoon. Computers & Geosciences, 37: 783−790. DOI:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.11.007.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Chandrasekharan H, Tadi SG, Sarangi A, et al. 2005. Urbanization effects on the groundwater status of Delhi, India. In: Savic DA, Marino MA, Savenije HG, Bertoni JC, editors. Sustainable Water Management Solutions for Large Cities: 293, 294-298.
 

Chen Y, Liu G, Huang X, et al. 2020. Development of a surrogate method of groundwater modeling using gated recurrent unit to improve the efficiency of parameter auto-calibration and global sensitivity analysis. Journal of Hydrology: 125726. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125726.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Chen ZL, Chen JY, Liu H, et al. 2018. Present status and development trends of underground space in Chinese cities: Evaluation and analysis. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71: 253−270. (in Chinese) DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.027.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Chi G, Su X, Lyu H, et al. 2021. Simulating the shallow groundwater level response to artificial recharge and storage in the Plain area of the Daqing River Basin, China. Sustainability, 13: 5626. DOI:10.3390/su13105626.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Cui JQ, Broere W, Lin D. 2021. Underground space utilisation for urban renewal. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 108: 103726. DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2020.103726.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

De Caro M, Crosta GB, Previati A. 2020. Modelling the interference of underground structures with groundwater flow and remedial solutions in Milan. Engineering Geology, 272: 105652. DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105652.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Dong L, Zhang J. 2021. Predicting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface water by a multiscale feature extraction-based deep learning approach. Science of the Total Environment: 799. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149509.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Foster S, Garduno H, Evans R, et al. 2004. Quaternary aquifer of the North China Plain — assessing and achieving groundwater resource sustainability. Hydrogeology Journal, 12: 81−93. DOI:10.1007/s10040-003-0300-6.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Han JC, Huang Y, Li Z, et al. 2016. Groundwater level prediction using a SOM-aided stepwise cluster inference model. Journal of Environmental Management, 182: 308−321. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.069.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

He DF, Shan SQ, Zhang YY, et al. 2018. 3-D geologic architecture of Xiong’an New Area: Constraints from seismic reflection data. Science China Earth Sciences, 48(9): 1207−1222.
Google Scholar
 

Hu ZH, Li XZ, Zhao XB, et al. 2008. Numerical analysis of factors affecting the range of heat transfer in earth surrounding three subways. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 18: 67−71. DOI:10.1016/S1006-1266(08)60015-2.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Li HP, Wickham JD, Bushley K, et al. 2020. New approaches in urban forestry to minimize invasive species impacts: The case of Xiongan New Area in China. Insects: 11. DOI:10.3390/insects11050300.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Li R, Zhang J, Krebs P. 2021. Consumption- and income-based sectoral emissions of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in China from 2002 to 2017. Environmental Science & Technology, 55: 3582−3592. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c08119.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Li X, Ye SY, Wei AH, et al. 2017. Modelling the response of shallow groundwater levels to combined climate and water-diversion scenarios in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Plain, China. Hydrogeology Journal, 25: 1733−1744. DOI:10.1007/s10040-017-1574-4.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Li XG, Yuan DJ. 2012. Response of a double-decked metro tunnel to shield driving of twin closely under-crossing tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 28: 18−30. DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2011.08.005.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Liu FY, Cui JH, Chen LJ, et al. 2009. A view on geomorphologic zonalization of north china plain. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 25(4): 100−103.
Google Scholar
 

Ma Y, Li HQ, Zhang J, et al. 2020. Geophysical technology for underground space exploration in Xiongan New Area. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 41(4): 535−542.
Google Scholar
 

Ma Z, Xia YB, Wang XD, et al. 2019. Integration of Engineering Geological Investigation Data and Construction of a 3D Geological Structure Model in the Xiong’an New Area. Geology in China, 46: 123−138.
Google Scholar
 

Makungo R, Odiyo JO. 2017. Estimating groundwater levels using system identification models in Nzhelele and Luvuvhu areas, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 100: 44−50. DOI:10.1016/j.pce.2017.01.019.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Melaku ND, Wang J. 2019. A modified SWAT module for estimating groundwater table at Lethbridge and Barons, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Hydrology, 575: 420−431. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.052.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Mengistu HA, Demlie MB, Abiye TA, et al. 2019. Conceptual hydrogeological and numerical groundwater flow modelling around the Moab Khutsong deep gold mine, South Africa. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9: 100266. DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100266.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Paris A, Teatini P, Venturini S, et al. 2010. Hydrological effects of bounding the Venice (Italy) industrial Harbor by a protection cutoff wall: Modeling study. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15: 882−891. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000258.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Qiao YK, Peng FL. 2016. Master planning for underground space in Luoyang: A case of a representative historic city in China. Procedia Engineering, 165: 119−125. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.743.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Qin H, Cao G, Kristensen M, et al. 2013. Integrated hydrological modeling of the North China Plain and implications for sustainable water management. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17: 3759−3778. DOI:10.5194/hess-17-3759-2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Ricci G, Enrione R, Eusebio A, et al. 2007. Numerical modelling of the interference between underground structures and aquifers in urban environment. The Turin subway — Line 1. Available on https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283166768.
 

Rwanga S, Ndambuki J. 2020. Solving groundwater problems fraught with uncertain recharge: An application to Central Limpopo, South Africa. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 10: 100305. DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100305.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Sathe SS, Mahanta C. 2019. Groundwater flow and arsenic contamination transport modeling for a multi aquifer terrain: Assessment and mitigation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 231: 166−181. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.057.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Serrano-Juan A, Pujades E, Vázquez-Suñè E, et al. 2018. Integration of groundwater by-pass facilities in the bottom slab design for large underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71: 231−243. DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2017.07.020.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Singha S, Pasupuleti S, Singha SS, et al. 2020. Effectiveness of groundwater heavy metal pollution indices studies by deep-learning. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 235: 103718. DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100245.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Uddin MG, Moniruzzaman M, Quader MA, et al. 2018. Spatial variability in the distribution of trace metals in groundwater around the Rooppur nuclear power plant in Ishwardi, Bangladesh. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 7: 220−231. DOI:10.1016/j.gsd.2018.06.002.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Wang C, Masoudi A, Wang M, et al. 2021. Land-use types shape soil microbial compositions under rapid urbanization in the Xiong’an New Area, China. Science of the Total Environment, 777: 145976. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145976.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Wang GL, Liu ZM, Chen H, et al. 2010. Compilation of technical methods for investigation and evaluation of groundwater resources. Beijing, Geological Publishing House.
 

Wu Y. 2003. Mechanism analysis of hazards caused by the interaction between groundwater and geo-environment. Environmental Geology, 44: 811−819. DOI:10.1007/s00254-003-0819-9.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Xie SL, Su YB, Xu WH, et al. 2019. The effect of habitat changes along the urbanization gradient for breeding birds: An example from the Xiong’an New Area. PeerJ, 7(10): 7961. DOI:10.7717/peerj.7961.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Xu HQ, Wang MY, Shi TT, et al. 2018. Prediction of ecological effects of potential population and impervious surface increases using a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI). Ecological Indicators, 93: 730−740. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.055.
Crossref Google Scholar
 
Xu YS, Shen SL, Du YJ, et al. 2013. Modelling the cutoff behavior of underground structure in multi-aquifer-aquitard groundwater system. Natural Hazards, 66: 731-748. Available on https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y
 

Xu YS, Ma L, Shen SL, et al. 2012. Evaluation of land subsidence by considering underground structures that penetrate the aquifers of Shanghai, China. Hydrogeology Journal, 20: 1623−1634. DOI:10.1007/s10040-012-0892-9.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Yang W, Wang Z, Hua P, et al. 2021. Impact of green infrastructure on the mitigation of road-deposited sediment induced stormwater pollution. Science of the Total Environment: 770.
Google Scholar
 

Yang W, Zhang J. 2021. Assessing the performance of gray and green strategies for sustainable urban drainage system development: A multi-criteria decision-making analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production: 293. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126191.
Crossref Google Scholar
 

Zhu X, Wang G, Wang X, et al. 2022. Hydrogeochemical and isotopic analyses of deep geothermal fluids in the Wumishan formation in Xiong’an New Area, China. Lithosphere: 2021.
Google Scholar
 

Zou WY, Yin SQ, Wang WT. 2021. Spatial interpolation of the extreme hourly precipitation at different return levels in the Haihe River basin. Journal of Hydrology, 598: 126273. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126273.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering
Volume 11 Issue 1,
March 2023
Pages 68-80
DOI: 10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280007
Cite this article:
Gao Y-h, Shen J-h, Chen L, et al. Influence of underground space development mode on the groundwater flow field in Xiong’an new area. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(1): 68-80. https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2023.9280007

863

Views

56

Downloads

4

Crossref

4

Web of Science

6

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 16 June 2022
Accepted: 25 November 2022
Published: 20 March 2023
© 2023 Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering Editorial Office

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0)
Return