Against the backdrop of escalating global climate change and increasing pressure to reduce carbon emissions, carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies have gained widespread attention as crucial measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Among these methods, CO2 geological sequestration in deep saline aquifers is considered one of the most promising methods because of its extensive reservoir distribution, high storage capacity, and long-term stability. However, compared with CO2 sequestration studies in oil and gas fields, research on CO2 geological sequestration in deep saline aquifers within coal mining areas remains relatively insufficient, particularly regarding assessments of CO2 storage capacity and suitability, which remain underexplored. The Huainan mining area, as a significant coal production base and energy industry center in China, possesses favorable geological characteristics and sequestration potential in its Ordovician saline aquifer. However, a systematic scientific assessment is lacking. Therefore, this study, which is based on existing geological data from the Huainan mining area, incorporates cap rock analysis to conduct a quantitative evaluation and comprehensive analysis of the CO2 sequestration capacity and suitability of the Ordovician saline aquifer. The results indicate that the Ordovician Majiagou formation limestone saline aquifer in the Huainan mining area has a wide distribution area with high porosity and permeability. The overlying multilayer mudstone, shale, and dense sandstone cap rocks are thick with low permeability, forming an ideal storage cap rock combination and providing stable geological conditions for long-term CO2 sequestration. Through the calculation and analysis of CO2 residual trapping and solubility trapping mechanisms, the total sequestration capacity of the Ordovician saline aquifer in the Huainan mining area was found to be 361.1091 × 105 t, with residual trapping dominating. This result is closely linked to the rapid physical process of residual trapping, whereas solubility trapping, owing to its slower chemical nature, contributes less in the short term. The CO2 sequestration capacity is the highest in the Xieqiao syncline deep structural belt, the southern wing of the Panji anticline, and the Zhuji collision structural belt. In terms of suitability evaluation, a multi-indicator assessment system based on engineering geological conditions, sequestration potential, and socioeconomic factors was constructed. The results show that the Xieqiao syncline deep structural belt, the Panji anticline south wing structural belt, and the Zhuji overthrust structural belt are rated as the most suitable sequestration areas, reflecting their superior geological suitability. The Panji anticline north wing, the Gu Gui transitional structural belt, and similar structural belts are evaluated as relatively suitable areas. In contrast, the Bagong Mountain arc-shaped monocline structural belt, the Shungeng Mountain fault block, and the Fushun fault block structural belts are rated as unsuitable for sequestration. This study systematically reveals the CO2 geological sequestration characteristics of the Ordovician saline aquifer in the Huainan mining area from three aspects: cap rock matching, sequestration capacity evaluation, and suitability assessment. These findings provide a scientific basis for the planning and deployment of CO2 deep saline aquifer sequestration projects in the Huainan mining area and similar regions.
B. Liang, C. Chen, C. S. Jia, et al. Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) in oil and gas reservoirs in China: Status, opportunities and challenges. Fuel, 2024, 375: 132353.
Z. X. Liu, M. Gao, X. M. Zhang, et al. CCUS and CO2 injection field application in abroad and China: Status and progress. Geoenergy Sci Eng, 2023, 229: 212011.
A. Bang, D. Moreno, H. Lund, et al. Regional CCUS strategies in the context of a fully decarbonized society. J Clean Prod, 2024, 477: 143882.
J. Yao, H. D. Han, Y. Yang, et al. A review of recent progress of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) in China. Appl Sci, 2023, 13: 1169.
Y. H. Li, Y. Wang, C. Q. Bi, et al. Assessment of in‐situ CO2 sequestration potential and enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM) production of continental coal-bearing basins in China. Acta Geol Sin (Engl Ed), 2024, 98: 1602–1614.
S. Bazhenov, V. Chuboksarov, A. Maximov, et al. Technical and economic prospects of CCUS projects in Russia. Sustain Mater Technol, 2022, 33: e00452.
V. Vishal, D. Chandra, U. Singh, et al. Understanding initial opportunities and key challenges for CCUS deployment in India at scale. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2021, 175: 105829.
F. Nath, M. N. Mahmood, N. Yousuf. Recent advances in CCUS: A critical review on technologies, regulatory aspects and economics. Geoenergy Sci Eng, 2024, 238: 212726.
M. X. Li, N. P. He, L. Xu, et al. Eco-CCUS: A cost-effective pathway towards carbon neutrality in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2023, 183: 113512.
P. Chiquet, J. L. Daridon, D. Broseta, et al. CO2/water interfacial tensions under pressure and temperature conditions of CO2 geological storage. Energy Convers Manag, 2007, 48: 736–744.
A. Bashir, M. Ali, S. Patil, et al. Comprehensive review of CO2 geological storage: Exploring principles, mechanisms, and prospects. Earth-Sci Rev, 2024, 249: 104672.
A. Alanazi, A. Baban, M. Ali, et al. Residual trapping of CO2, N2, and a CO2–N2 mixture in Indiana limestone using robust NMR coreflooding: Implications for CO2 geological storage. Fuel, 2023, 353: 129221.
Y. T. Dai, F. P. Lai, J. Ni, et al. Evaluation of the impact of CO2 geological storage on tight oil reservoir properties. J Pet Sci Eng, 2022, 212: 110307.
A. Luo, Y. M. Li, X. Chen, et al. Review of CO2 sequestration mechanism in saline aquifers. Nat Gas Ind B, 2022, 9: 383–393.
G. D. Cui, Z. Hu, F. L. Ning, et al. A review of salt precipitation during CO2 injection into saline aquifers and its potential impact on carbon sequestration projects in China. Fuel, 2023, 334: 126615.
S. Kumar, J. Foroozesh, K. Edlmann, et al. A comprehensive review of value-added CO2 sequestration in subsurface saline aquifers. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 2020, 81: 103437.
S. Y. Li, P. Wang, Z. J. Wang, et al. Strategy to enhance geological CO2 storage capacity in saline aquifer. Geophys Res Lett, 2023, 50: e2022GL101431.
D. Akindipe, S. Saraji, M. Piri. Salt precipitation during geological sequestration of supercritical CO2 in saline aquifers: A pore-scale experimental investigation. Adv Water Resour, 2021, 155: 104011.
Y. Li, R. Wang, Q. M. Zhao, et al. A CO2 storage potential evaluation method for saline aquifers in a petroliferous basin. Pet Explor Dev, 2023, 50: 484–491.
Y. Li, P. Li, H. J. Qu, et al. Potential evaluation of saline aquifers for the geological storage of carbon dioxide: A case study of saline aquifers in the Qian-5 member in northeastern Ordos Basin. China Geol, 2024, 7: 12–25.
Y. C. Lin, T. A. Gunawan, C. Isaac, et al. A preliminary assessment of CO2 capture, transport, and storage network for China’s steel sector. J Clean Prod, 2024, 454: 142280.
E. Ranaee, R. Khattar, F. Inzoli, et al. Assessment and uncertainty quantification of onshore geological CO2 storage capacity in China. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2022, 121: 103804.
Z. X. Mi, F. G. Wang, Y. Z. Yang, et al. Evaluation of the potentiality and suitability for CO2 geological storage in the Junggar Basin, Northwestern China. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 78: 62–72.
X. Y. Xu, Q. Li, B. F. Cai, et al. Cost assessment and potential evaluation of geologic carbon storage in China based on least-cost path analysis. Appl Energy, 2024, 371: 123622.
L. T. Li, Y. M. Liu, Y. Z. Li, et al. Overview of typical projects for geological storage of CO2 in offshore saline aquifers. Liquids, 2024, 4: 744–767.
T. A. Torp, J. Gale. Demonstrating storage of CO2 in geological reservoirs: The Sleipner and SACS projects. Energy, 2004, 29: 1361–1369.
K. Michael, A. Golab, V. Shulakova, et al. Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—A review of the experience from existing storage operations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2010, 4: 659–667.
J. Trémosa, C. Castillo, C. Q. Vong, et al. Long-term assessment of geochemical reactivity of CO2 storage in highly saline aquifers: Application to Ketzin, in Salah and Snøhvit storage sites. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 20: 2–26.
M. Watson, H. Nourollah, D. Bason, et al. Optimising CO2 storage resource utilisation: Insights from the Otway Stage 4 field program. Aust Energy Prod J, 2024, 64: 54–65.
C. Jenkins, P. Barraclough, J. Correa, et al. Field tests of geological storage of CO2 at the Otway international test centre, Australia: Trapping and monitoring the migrating plumes. Geoenergy, 2024, 2: geoenergy2023–035.
J. Hu, L. G. Zheng, S. K. Liu, et al. Quantifying the impacts of coal mining activities on topsoil using Hg stable isotope: A case study of Guqiao mining area, Huainan City. Environ Pollut, 2023, 335: 122378.
Q. S. Hao, B. Wang. Landscape pattern changes in coal resource-based cities: A case study of Huainan City in China. J Infrastruct Policy Dev, 2024, 8: 2946.
J. Z. Qin, Q. H. Zhong, Y. Tang, et al. CO2 storage potential assessment of offshore saline aquifers in China. Fuel, 2023, 341: 127681.
N. Wei, X. C. Li, Z. S. Jiao, et al. A hierarchical framework for CO2 storage capacity in deep saline aquifer formations. Front Earth Sci, 2022, 9: 777323.
I. Ismail, V. Gaganis. Carbon capture, utilization, and storage in saline aquifers: Subsurface policies, development plans, well control strategies and optimization approaches—A review. Clean Technol, 2023, 5: 609–637.
T. Peng, J. W. Wu, Z. Q. Ren, et al. Distribution of terrestrial heat flow and structural control in Huainan–Huaibei coalfield. Chin J Geophys, 2015, 58: 2391–2401. (in Chinese)
X. C. Shi, J. X. Zhang, G. Q. Li. Characteristics of in situ stress field in the Huainan mining area, China and its control factors. Environ Earth Sci, 2021, 80: 682.
M. Liu, D. Z. Chen, H. R. Ma, et al. Do red marine carbonates represent oxic environments? New understanding from the Upper Ordovician marine limestone in Tarim Basin, China. Mar Pet Geol, 2025, 171: 107166.
X. Ke, J. W. Chen, J. M. Gong, et al. Suitability evaluation of CO2 geological sequestration in the East China Sea shelf basin. Mar Geol Front, 2023, 39: 1–12. (in Chinese)
D. Sopher, C. Juhlin, M. Erlström. A probabilistic assessment of the effective CO2 storage capacity within the Swedish sector of the Baltic Basin. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2014, 30: 148–170.
P. Lu, Y. Y. Hao, Y. Bai, et al. Optimal selection of favorable areas for CO2 geological storage in the Majiagou formation in the Ordos Basin. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 109: 103360.
Y. Abuov, N. Seisenbayev, W. Lee. CO2 storage potential in sedimentary basins of Kazakhstan. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 103: 103186.
J. Ye, A. Afifi, F. Rowaihy, et al. Evaluation of geological CO2 storage potential in Saudi Arabian sedimentary basins. Earth-Sci Rev, 2023, 244: 104539.
X. Z. Wang, H. Yang, Y. J. Huang, et al. Evolution of CO2 storage mechanisms in low-permeability tight sandstone reservoirs. Engineering, in press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.05.013.
A. Izadpanahi, M. J. Blunt, N. Kumar, et al. A review of carbon storage in saline aquifers: Mechanisms, prerequisites, and key considerations. Fuel, 2024, 369: 131744.
E. Tillero. Machine learning-based modelling for geologic CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers. Case study of bunter sandstone in southern North Sea. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control, 2024, 133: 104077.