AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Vehicle sideslip trajectory prediction based on time-series analysis and multi-physical model fusion

Lipeng Cao1,2Yugong Luo2Yongsheng Wang2Jian Chen2Yansong He1( )
College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

On highways, vehicles that swerve out of their lane due to sideslip can pose a serious threat to the safety of autonomous vehicles. To ensure their safety, predicting the sideslip trajectories of such vehicles is crucial. However, the scarcity of data on vehicle sideslip scenarios makes it challenging to apply data-driven methods for prediction. Hence, this study uses a physical model-based approach to predict vehicle sideslip trajectories. Nevertheless, the traditional physical model-based method relies on constant input assumption, making its long-term prediction accuracy poor. To address this challenge, this study presents the time-series analysis and interacting multiple model-based (IMM) sideslip trajectory prediction (TSIMMSTP) method, which encompasses time-series analysis and multi-physical model fusion, for the prediction of vehicle sideslip trajectories. Firstly, we use the proposed adaptive quadratic exponential smoothing method with damping (AQESD) in the time-series analysis module to predict the input state sequence required by kinematic models. Then, we employ an IMM approach to fuse the prediction results of various physical models. The implementation of these two methods allows us to significantly enhance the long-term predictive accuracy and reduce the uncertainty of sideslip trajectories. The proposed method is evaluated through numerical simulations in vehicle sideslip scenarios, and the results clearly demonstrate that it improves the long-term prediction accuracy and reduces the uncertainty compared to other model-based methods.

References

[1]
Alahi, A., Goel, K., Ramanathan, V., Robicquet, A., Li, F. F., Savarese, S., 2016. Social LSTM: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 961–971.
[2]
Ammoun, S., Nashashibi, F., 2009. Real time trajectory prediction for collision risk estimation between vehicles. In: 2009 IEEE 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, 417–422.
[3]

Arulampalam, M. S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., Clapp, T., 2002. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 50, 174–188.

[4]
Bahari, M., Saadatnejad, S., Rahimi, A., Shaverdikondori, M., Shahidzadeh, A. H., Moosavi-Dezfooli, S. M. et al., 2022. Vehicle trajectory prediction works, but not everywhere. In: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 17102–17112.
[5]
Deo, N., Trivedi, M. M., 2018. Convolutional social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 1549–15498.
[6]

Eskandarian, A., Wu, C., Sun, C., 2021. Research advances and challenges of autonomous and connected ground vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 22, 683–711.

[7]
Fang, L., Jiang, Q., Shi, J., Zhou, B., 2020. TPNet: trajectory proposal network for motion prediction. In: 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 6796–6805.
[8]

Gardner, E. S., 1985. Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. J Forecast, 4, 1–28.

[9]

Ghorai, P., Eskandarian, A., Kim, Y. K., Mehr, G., 2022. State estimation and motion prediction of vehicles and vulnerable road users for cooperative autonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 23, 16983–17002.

[10]

Gulzar, M., Muhammad, Y., Muhammad, N., 2021. A survey on motion prediction of pedestrians and vehicles for autonomous driving. IEEE Access, 9, 137957–137969.

[11]
Houenou, A., Bonnifait, P., Cherfaoui, V., Wen, Y., 2013. Vehicle trajectory prediction based on motion model and maneuver recognition. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2013), 4363–4369.
[12]

Huang, Y., Du, J., Yang, Z., Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., Chen, H., 2022. A survey on trajectory-prediction methods for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Veh, 7, 652–674.

[13]

Izquierdo, R., Quintanar, Á., Llorca, D. F., Daza, I. G., Hernández, N., Parra, I. et al., 2023. Vehicle trajectory prediction on highways using bird eye view representations and deep learning. Appl Intell, 53, 8370–8388.

[14]

Kim, W., Kang, C. M., Son, Y. S., Lee, S. H., Chung, C. C., 2018. Vehicle path prediction using yaw acceleration for adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 19, 3818–3829.

[15]

Lefèvre, S., Vasquez, D., Laugier, C., 2014. A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles. ROBOMECH J, 1, 1–14.

[16]
Liang, M., Yang, B., Hu, R., Chen, Y., Liao, R., Feng, S., et al., 2020. Learning lane graph representations for motion forecasting. Computer Vision – ECCV 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 541–556.
[17]

Liu, C. S., Peng, H., 1996. Road friction coefficient estimation for vehicle path prediction. Veh Syst Dyn, 25, 413–425.

[18]

Liu, J., Luo, Y., Zhong, Z., Li, K., Huang, H., Xiong, H., 2022. A probabilistic architecture of long-term vehicle trajectory prediction for autonomous driving. Engineering, 19, 228–239.

[19]
Messaoud, K., Yahiaoui, I., Verroust-Blondet, A., Nashashibi, F., 2019. Non-local social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 975–980.
[20]

Messaoud, K., Yahiaoui, I., Verroust-Blondet, A., Nashashibi, F., 2021. Attention based vehicle trajectory prediction. IEEE Trans Intell Veh, 6, 175–185.

[21]

Mozaffari, S., Al-Jarrah, O. Y., Dianati, M., Jennings, P., Mouzakitis, A., 2022. Deep learning-based vehicle behavior prediction for autonomous driving applications: A review. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 23, 33–47.

[22]

Park, J. H., Tai, Y. W., 2015. A simulation based method for vehicle motion prediction. Comput Vis Image Underst, 136, 79–91.

[23]

Schreier, M., Willert, V., Adamy, J., 2016. An integrated approach to maneuver-based trajectory prediction and criticality assessment in arbitrary road environments. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 17, 2751–2766.

[24]
Schubert, R., Richter, E., Wanielik, G., 2008. Comparison and evaluation of advanced motion models for vehicle tracking. In: 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, 1–6.
[25]

Shiller, Z., Sundar, S., 1998. Emergency lane-change maneuvers of autonomous vehicles. J Dyn Syst Meas Contr, 120, 37–44.

[26]
Song, H., Luan, D., Ding, W., Wang, M. Y., Chen, Q., 2022. Learning to Predict Vehicle Trajectories with Model-based Planning. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, 1035–1045.
[27]
Wissing, C., Nattermann, T., Glander, K. H., Bertram, T., 2018. Trajectory prediction for safety critical maneuvers in automated highway driving. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 131–136.
[28]

Xiang, Y., He, Y., Luo, Y., Bu, D., Kong, W., Chen, J., 2022. Recognition model of sideslip of surrounding vehicles based on perception information of driverless vehicle. IEEE Intell Syst, 37, 79–91.

[29]

Xie, G., Gao, H., Qian, L., Huang, B., Li, K., Wang, J., 2018. Vehicle trajectory prediction by integrating physics- and maneuver-based approaches using interactive multiple models. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 65, 5999–6008.

[30]

Yao, H., Li, Q., Li, X., 2022. Trajectory prediction dimensionality reduction for low-cost connected automated vehicle systems. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 111, 103439.

[31]

Yao, H., Li, X., Yang, X., 2023. Physics-aware learning-based vehicle trajectory prediction of congested traffic in a connected vehicle environment. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 72, 102–112.

[32]
Zhang, Q., Hu, S., Sun, J., Chen, Q. A., Mao, Z. M., 2022. On adversarial robustness of trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05057
Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Pages 161-172
Cite this article:
Cao L, Luo Y, Wang Y, et al. Vehicle sideslip trajectory prediction based on time-series analysis and multi-physical model fusion. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2023, 6(3): 161-172. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2023.9210016

286

Views

11

Downloads

5

Crossref

7

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 17 April 2023
Revised: 16 June 2023
Accepted: 30 July 2023
Published: 30 September 2023
© The author(s) 2023.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return