AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Public perception of connected and automated vehicles: Benefits, concerns, and barriers from an Australian perspective

Ali Matin( )Hussein Dia
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne 3122, Australia
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study investigates the attitudes and concerns of the Australian public toward connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs), and the factors influencing their willingness to adopt this technology. Through a comprehensive survey, a diverse group of respondents provided valuable insights toward various CAV scenarios such as riding in a vehicle with no driver, self-driving public transport, self-driving taxis, and heavy vehicles without drivers. The results highlight the significant impact of safety concerns about automated vehicles on individuals’ attitudes across all scenarios. Higher levels of concern were associated with more negative attitudes, and a strong correlation between concerns and opposition underlines the necessity of addressing these apprehensions to build public trust and promote CAV adoption. Interestingly, nearly 70% of respondents felt uncomfortable driving next to a CAV, but they displayed more confidence in adopting automated public transport in the near future. Additionally, around 40% of participants indicated a strong willingness to purchase a CAV, primarily driven by the desire to reduce their carbon footprint and safety considerations. Notably, respondents with health conditions or disability exhibited heightened interest (almost double those without health conditions) in CAV technology. Gender differences emerged in attitudes and preferences toward CAVs, with women expressing a greater level of concern and perceiving higher barriers to CAV deployment. This emphasizes the importance of employing targeted approaches to address the specific concerns of different demographics. The study also underscores the role of trust in technology as a significant barrier to CAV deployment, ranking high among respondents’ concerns. To overcome these challenges and facilitate successful CAV deployment, various strategies are suggested, including live demonstrations, dedicated routes for automated public transport, adoption incentives, and addressing liability concerns. The findings from this study offer valuable insights for government agencies, vehicle manufacturers, and stakeholders in promoting the successful implementation of CAVs. By understanding societal acceptance and addressing concerns, decision-makers can devise effective interventions and policies to ensure the safe and widespread adoption of CAVs in Australia. Moreover, vehicle manufacturers can leverage these results to consider design aspects that align with passenger preferences, thereby facilitating the broader acceptance and adoption of CAVs in the future. Finally, this research provides a significant contribution to the understanding of public perception and acceptance of CAVs in the Australian context. By guiding decision-making and informing strategies, the study lays the foundation for a safer and more effective integration of CAVs into the country’s transportation landscape.

References

 
Accenture., 2011. Embedded software consumer pulse survey. https://newsroom.accenture.com/content/1101/files/EmbeddedSoftwareOverall.pdf
 
Bella, G., Biondi, P., Tudisco, G., 2021. Car drivers’ privacy concerns and trust perceptions. In: Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business: 18th International Conference, 143–154.
 
Bergenhem, C., Shladover, S., Coelingh, E., Englund, C., Tsugawa, S., 2012. Overview of platooning systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/174621
 
Bishop, P., Povyakalo, A., Strigini, L., 2021. Bootstrapping confidence in future safety based on past safe operation. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2110.10718
 
Brinkley, J., Posadas, B., Woodward, J., Gilbert, J. E., 2017. Opinions and preferences of blind and low vision consumers regarding self-driving vehicles: Results of focus group discussions. In: Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 290–299.
 
Cisco., 2013. Cisco Customer Experience Research-Automotive Industry. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/ccer_report_manufacturing.pdf
 
Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., Stares, S., Akyelken, N., Cavoli, C., Day, J., et al., 2020. A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 6, 100133.
 
Danise, A., 2015. Women say ‘no thanks’ to driverless cars, men say ‘tell me more’. https://www.propertycasualty360.com/2015/06/10/women-say-no-thanks-to-driverless-cars-men-say-tel/?slreturn=20230623005434
 
Dia, H., 2016. Who (or what) is behind the wheel? The regulatory challenges of driverless cars. https://theconversation.com/who-or-what-is-behind-the-wheel-the-regulatory-challenges-of-driverless-cars-55434
 

Emory, K., Douma, F., Cao, J., 2022. Autonomous vehicle policies with equity implications: Patterns and gaps. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 13, 100521.

 
Gao, P., Kaas, H.-W., Mohr, D., Wee, D., 2016. Automotive revolution-perspective towards 2030. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/disruptive-trends-that-will-transform-the-auto-industry/de-DE
 

Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A., Bunker, J., 2020. Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4, 106.

 
Howard, D., Dai, D., 2014. Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. In: Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, 1–16.
 
Jardim, A. S., Quartulli, A. M., Casley, S. V., 2013. A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/2596
 
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG), 2013. Self-driving cars: Are we ready? https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2013/10/self-driving-cars-are-we-ready.pdf
 
Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler (KPMG), 2020. Autonomous Vehicles Readiness Index. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/07/2020-autonomous-vehicles-readiness- index.pdf
 
Litman, T., 2020. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: Implications for transport planning. https://www.vtpi.org/avip.pdf
 
Liu, J., Ma, D., Weimerskirch, A., Zhu, H., 2016. Secure and safe automated vehicle platooning. http://researchlabs.umd.umich.edu/safelab/publication/reliability16.pdf
 
Masterson, L., 2023. Autonomous cars: Will you be a co-pilot or a passenger? https://www.insurance.com/auto-insurance/claims/autonomous-cars-self-driving.html
 

Matin, A., Dia, H., 2022. Impacts of connected and automated vehicles on road safety and efficiency: A systematic literature review. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 24, 2705−2736.

 
Nordhoff, S., de Winter, J., Kyriakidis, M., van Arem, B., Happee, R., 2018. Acceptance of driverless vehicles: Results from a large cross-national questionnaire study. J Adv Transp, 2018, 1–22.
 
Patel, H., Connolly, R., 2007. Factors influencing technology adoption: A review. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Business Information Management Association Conference, 416–431.
 
Power, J. D., 2012. Vehicle owners show willingness to spend on automotive infotainment features. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jd-power-and-associates-reports-vehicle-owners-show-willingness-to-spend-on-automotive-infotainment-features-149088105.html
 
Reimer, B., 2014. Driver assistance systems and the transition to automated vehicles: A path to increase older adult safety and mobility? Public Policy Aging Rep, 24, 27–31.
 
Richardson, E., Davies, P., 2018. The changing public’s perception of self-driving cars. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34641.02402
 
SAE., 2021. Levels of Driving Automtion. Warrendale , USA: SAE International. https://www.sae.org/blog/sae-j3016-update
 
Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., 2014a. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Transportation Research Institute, 103024.
 
Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., 2014b. Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Transportation Research Institute, 103139.
 
Schoettle, B., Sivak, M., 2015. Motorists’ preferences for different levels of vehicle automation, 103217.
 
Shabanpour, R., Mousavi, S. N. D., Golshani, N., Auld, J., Mohammadian, A., 2017. Consumer preferences of electric and automated vehicles. In: 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 716–720.
 
Stanek, D., Milam, R. T., Huang, E., Wang, Y. A., 2018. Measuring autonomous vehicle impacts on congested networks using simulation. In: Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, 13.
 
Ulahannan, A., Cain, R., Dhadyalla, G., Jennings, P., Birrell, S., Waters, M., et al., 2019. Using the ideas café to explore trust in autonomous vehicles. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3 –14.
 
Underwood, S. E., 2014. Automated vehicles forecast vehicle symposium opinion survey. In: Automated Vehicles Symposium, 15–17.
 

Wang, K., Akar, G., 2019. Factors affecting the adoption of autonomous vehicles for commute trips: An analysis with the 2015 and 2017 puget sound travel surveys. Transport Res Rec, 2673, 13−25.

 
Woisetschläger, D. M., 2016. Consumer perceptions of automated driving technologies: An examination of use cases and branding strategies. In: Autonomous Driving, 687–706.
 

Ye, Y., Wang, H., 2018. Optimal design of transportation networks with automated vehicle links and congestion pricing. J Adv Transp, 2018, 1−12.

 
Yigitcanlar, T., Inkinen, T., 2019. Geographies of Disruption: Place Making for Innovation in the Age of Knowledge Economy. Lausanne, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Pages 108-128
Cite this article:
Matin A, Dia H. Public perception of connected and automated vehicles: Benefits, concerns, and barriers from an Australian perspective. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2024, 7(2): 108-128. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2023.9210028

231

Views

20

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 17 August 2023
Revised: 27 September 2023
Accepted: 26 November 2023
Published: 30 June 2024
© The author(s) 2023.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return