AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Collaborative multi-lane on-ramp merging strategy for connected and automated vehicles using dynamic conflict graph

Jia Shi1Yugong Luo1Pengfei Li1Jiawei Wang2Keqiang Li1( )
School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

The on-ramp merging in multi-lane highway scenarios presents challenges due to the complexity of coordinating vehicles’ merging and lane-changing behaviors, while ensuring safety and optimizing traffic flow. However, there are few studies that have addressed the merging problem of ramp vehicles and the cooperative lane-change problem of mainline vehicles within a unified framework and proposed corresponding optimization strategies. To tackle this issue, this study adopts a cyber-physical integration perspective and proposes a graph-based solution approach. First, the information of vehicle groups in the physical plane is mapped to the cyber plane, and a dynamic conflict graph is introduced in the cyber space to describe the conflict relationships among vehicle groups. Subsequently, graph decomposition and search strategies are employed to obtain the optimal solution, including the set of mainline vehicles changing lanes, passing sequences for each route, and corresponding trajectories. Finally, the proposed dynamic conflict graph-based algorithm is validated through simulations in continuous traffic with various densities, and its performance is compared with the default algorithm in SUMO. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach in improving vehicle safety and traffic efficiency, particularly in high traffic density scenarios, providing valuable insights for future research in multi-lane merging strategies.

References

[1]

Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A., Sugiyama, Y., 1995. Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics, 51, 1035–1042.

[2]

Bian, Y., Zheng, Y., Ren, W., Li, S. E., Wang, J., Li, K., 2019. Reducing time headway for platooning of connected vehicles via V2V communication. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 102, 87–105.

[3]

Chen, C., Wang, J., Xu, Q., Wang, J., Li, K., 2021a. Mixed platoon control of automated and human-driven vehicles at a signalized intersection: Dynamical analysis and optimal control. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 127, 103138.

[4]

Chen, S., Dong, J., Ha, P., Li, Y., Labi, S., 2021b. Graph neural network and reinforcement learning for multi‐agent cooperative control of connected autonomous vehicles. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng, 36, 838–857.

[5]

Chu, W., Wuniri, Q., Du, X., Xiong, Q., Huang, T., Li, K., 2021. Cloud control system architectures, technologies and applications on intelligent and connected vehicles: A review. Chin J Mech Eng, 34, 139.

[6]

Eskandarian, A., Wu, C., Sun, C., 2021. Research advances and challenges of autonomous and connected ground vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 22, 683–711.

[7]

Fukuyama, S., 2020. Dynamic game-based approach for optimizing merging vehicle trajectories using time-expanded decision diagram. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 120, 102766.

[8]

Ge, J. I., Orosz, G., 2018. Connected cruise control among human-driven vehicles: Experiment-based parameter estimation and optimal control design. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 95, 445–459.

[9]

Guanetti, J., Kim, Y., Borrelli, F., 2018. Control of connected and automated vehicles: State of the art and future challenges. Annu Rev Contr, 45, 18–40.

[10]

Habibzadeh, H., Nussbaum, B. H., Anjomshoa, F., Kantarci, B., Soyata, T., 2019. A survey on cybersecurity, data privacy, and policy issues in cyber-physical system deployments in smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc, 50, 101660.

[11]

Hartl, R. F., Sethi, S. P., Vickson, R. G., 1995. A survey of the maximum principles for optimal control problems with state constraints. SIAM Rev, 37, 181–218.

[12]

Hou, K., Zheng, F., Liu, X., Guo, G., 2023. Cooperative on-ramp merging control model for mixed traffic on multi-lane freeways. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 24, 10774–10790.

[13]

Hu, M., Li, C., Bian, Y., Zhang, H., Qin, Z., Xu, B., 2022. Fuel economy-oriented vehicle platoon control using economic model predictive control. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 23, 20836–20849.

[14]

Hu, X., Sun, J., 2019. Trajectory optimization of connected and autonomous vehicles at a multilane freeway merging area. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 101, 111–125.

[15]

Jia, D., Lu, K., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Shen, X., 2016. A survey on platoon-based vehicular cyber-physical systems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor, 18, 263–284.

[16]

Li, L., Chen, X., 2017. Vehicle headway modeling and its inferences in macroscopic/microscopic traffic flow theory: A survey. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 76, 170–188.

[17]
Lopez, P. A., Wiessner, E., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Flotterod, Y.-P., et al., 2018. Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2575–2582.
[18]

Milanes, V., Godoy, J., Villagra, J., Perez, J., 2011. Automated on-ramp merging system for congested traffic situations. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 12, 500–508.

[19]

Ntousakis, I. A., Nikolos, I. K., Papageorgiou, M., 2016. Optimal vehicle trajectory planning in the context of cooperative merging on highways. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 71, 464–488.

[20]

Rios-Torres, J., Malikopoulos, A. A., 2017a. A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 18, 1066–1077.

[21]

Rios-Torres, J., Malikopoulos, A. A., 2017b. Automated and cooperative vehicle merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 18, 780–789.

[22]

Rios-Torres, J., Malikopoulos, A. A., 2018. Impact of partial penetrations of connected and automated vehicles on fuel consumption and traffic flow. IEEE Trans Intell Veh, 3, 453–462.

[23]

Scarinci, R., Heydecker, B., 2014. Control concepts for facilitating motorway on-ramp merging using intelligent vehicles. Transp Rev, 34, 775–797.

[24]

Shi, J., Li, K., Chen, C., Kong, W., Luo, Y., 2023. Cooperative merging strategy in mixed traffic based on optimal final-state phase diagram with flexible highway merging points. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 24, 11185–11197.

[25]
Shi, J., Wan, J., Yan, H., Suo, H., 2011. A survey of cyber-physical systems. In: 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), 1–6.
[26]

Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D., 2000. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics, 62, 1805–1824.

[27]

Wang, H., Yuan, S., Guo, M., Li, X., Lan, W., 2021a. A deep reinforcement learning-based approach for autonomous driving in highway on-ramp merge. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng, 235, 2726–2739.

[28]

Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Xu, Q., Wang, J., Li, K., 2021b. Controllability analysis and optimal control of mixed traffic flow with human-driven and autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 22, 7445–7459.

[29]

Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Chen, C., Xu, Q., Li, K., 2022. Leading cruise control in mixed traffic flow: System modeling, controllability, and string stability. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst, 23, 12861–12876.

[30]
Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Li, K., Xu, Q., 2023. DeeP-LCC: Data-EnablEd predictive leading cruise control in mixed traffic flow. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Technol, 31, 2760–2776.
[31]
Wang, Z., Bian, Y., Shladover, S. E., Wu, G., Li, S. E., Barth, M. J., 2020. A survey on cooperative longitudinal motion control of multiple connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Intell Transport Syst Mag, 12, 4–24.
[32]
Wang, Z., Wu, G., Barth, M., 2018. Distributed consensus-based cooperative highway on-ramp merging using V2X communications. SAE Technical Paper, 2018–01–1177.
[33]
Xu, B., Ban, X. J., Bian, Y., Wang, J., Li, K., 2017. V2I based cooperation between traffic signal and approaching automated vehicles. In: 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 1658–1664.
[34]

Xu, H., Zhang, Y., Cassandras, C. G., Li, L., Feng, S., 2020. A bi-level cooperative driving strategy allowing lane changes. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 120, 102773.

[35]

Yan, F., Dridi, M., El Moudni, A., 2013. An autonomous vehicle sequencing problem at intersections. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci, 23, 183–200.

[36]
Ye, F., Guo, J., Kim, K. J., Orlik, P. V., Ahn, H., Di Cairano, S., et al., 2019. Bi-level optimal edge computing model for on-ramp merging in connected vehicle environment. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). ACM, 2005–2011.
[37]

Zhang, J. J., Wang, F. Y., Wang, X., Xiong, G., Zhu, F., Lv, Y., et al., 2018. Cyber-physical-social systems: The state of the art and perspectives. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst, 5, 829–840.

[38]

Zhang, J., Wang, F. Y., Wang, K., Lin, W. H., Xu, X., Chen, C., 2011. Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 12, 1624–1639.

[39]

Zheng, Y., Li, S. E., Wang, J., Cao, D., Li, K., 2016. Stability and scalability of homogeneous vehicular platoon: Study on the influence of information flow topologies. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 17, 14–26.

[40]

Zhou, Y., Chung, E., Bhaskar, A., Cholette, M. E., 2019. A state-constrained optimal control based trajectory planning strategy for cooperative freeway mainline facilitating and on-ramp merging maneuvers under congested traffic. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, 109, 321–342.

[41]

Zhu, J., Easa, S., Gao, K., 2022. Merging control strategies of connected and autonomous vehicles at freeway on-ramps: A comprehensive review. J Intell Connect Veh, 5, 99–111.

Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Pages 38-51
Cite this article:
Shi J, Luo Y, Li P, et al. Collaborative multi-lane on-ramp merging strategy for connected and automated vehicles using dynamic conflict graph. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2024, 7(1): 38-51. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2023.9210032

292

Views

55

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 12 December 2023
Revised: 16 January 2024
Accepted: 24 January 2024
Published: 31 March 2024
© The author(s) 2024.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return