AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (13.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Spectrum quantification-based safety efficiency evaluation of autonomous vehicle under random cut-in scenarios

Jiang Chen1Weiwei Zhang2( )Miao Liu1Xiaolan Wang1Jun Gong2Jun Li2,3Boqi Li4Jiejie Xu2
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China
Shanghai Smart Vehicle Cooperating Innovation Center Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201805, China
School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Continuous-scale trusted safety efficiency evaluation is crucial for the agile development and robust validation of autonomous vehicle intelligence. While the UN R157 Regulation evaluates automated lane-keeping system (ALKS) performance baselines through safe collision plots (SCPs) in various scenario clusters, quantifying the specific ALKS safety efficiency remains challenging. We propose a spectrum quantification approach to evaluate the safety efficiency of autonomous vehicles in cut-in scenarios. First, we collected speed-distance data under different cut-in scenarios and extracted essential spectral features to indicate the vehicle motion parameters during the cut-in process. Second, by utilizing Fourier analysis, a spectral analysis model was built to quantify and analyze the vehicle motion characteristics, providing insights into scenario safety. Finally, we created approximate analytical equations for the normalized disturbance frequencies in the nonlinear response scenarios of autonomous driving systems by combining the SCP with a frequency spectrum analysis model. The results showed that the normalized disturbance frequency in the cut-in scenario was approximately 0.2. When the relative longitudinal distance and speed of the vehicle are the same, if the cut-in speed of the cut-in vehicle is larger, the normalized disturbance frequency is higher, indicating that the cut-in process of the autonomous vehicle is more dangerous and may trigger a collision.

References

 

Alexiadis, V., Colyar, J., Halkias, J., 2004. The next generation simulation program. ITE J, 74, 22−26.

 
China Automotive Technology Research Center C-NCAP, 2021. C-NCAP: 2021. http://www.c-ncap.org.cn
 
European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro-NCAP), 2023. Annual safety report, Euro NCAP: 2023. https://www.euroncap.com
 

Gao, F., Duan, J., He, Y., 2019. A test scenario automatic generation strategy for intelligent driving systems. Math Probl Eng, 99, 1−10.

 
Guo, J., Kurup, U., Shah, M., 2020. Is It safe to drive? An overview of factors, metrics, and datasets for drive ability assessment in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 21, 3135–3151.
 
Hallerbach, S., Xia, Y., Eberle, U., 2018. Simulation-based identification of critical scenarios for cooperative and automated vehicles. SAE Tech Pap, 1, 93–106.
 
Hetrick, S., 1997. Examination of driver lane change behavior and the potential effectiveness of warning onset rules for lane change or "side" crash avoidance systems. M.S. Dissertation. Blacksburg, USA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
 
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2022a. ISO: Road vehicles—Safety of the intended functionality, ISO21448: 2022. https://www.iso.org/standard/77490.html
 
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2022b. Scenario-based safety evaluation framework for Automated Driving Systems, ISO 34502: 2022. https://www.iso.org/standard/78951.html
 
International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2021. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles, ISO/SAE PAS 22736:2021. https://www.iso.org/standard/73766.html
 
Intelligent Vehicle Integrated Systems Test Area (IVISTA), 2020. IVISTA: 2020. https://en.i-vista.org/autoindex/index1
 
Jacobo, A., Nobuyuki, U., Eiichi, K., 2019. A Safety Assurance process for automated driving systems. In: 26th Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress, 21–25.
 

Li, L., Huang, W. L., Liu, Y., 2017. Intelligence testing for autonomous vehicles: A new approach. IEEE Trans Intell Veh, 1, 158−166.

 

Li, Y., Zheng, Y., Morys, B., 2021. Threat assessment techniques in intelligent vehicles: A comparative survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 13, 71−91.

 
Menzel, T., Bagschik, G., 2019. From functional to logical scenarios: Detailing a keyword-based scenario description for execution in a simulation environment. IEEE Intell Veh Symp, 2383–2390.
 
Sun, X. Y., Zhu, X. C., Li, L., Ma, Z. X., 2017. Study of causation mechanism and dynamic feature for typical rear end situations in china-FOT. In: IET International Conference on Intelligent and Connected Vehicles (ICV 2016), 1–6.
 

Thal, S., Sonka, A., 2021. International harmonization of safety assessment for automated driving. ATZ Worldw, 123, 56−61.

 
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Information Unit, 2021. Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to Automated Lane Keeping Systems. https://unece.org/R157e.pdf
 
Zhang, S., Peng, H., Zhao, D., 2018. Accelerated evaluation of autonomous vehicles in the lane change scenario based on subset simulation technique. In: the 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 93–106.
 

Zhao, D., Lam, H., Peng, H., 2017. Accelerated evaluation of automated vehicles safety in lane change scenarios based on importance sampling techniques. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst, 18, 595−607.

Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Pages 205-218
Cite this article:
Chen J, Zhang W, Liu M, et al. Spectrum quantification-based safety efficiency evaluation of autonomous vehicle under random cut-in scenarios. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2024, 7(3): 205-218. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2023.9210035

85

Views

8

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 23 November 2023
Revised: 25 January 2024
Accepted: 20 February 2024
Published: 26 September 2024
© The author(s) 2023.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return