AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Convergence of emerging transportation trends: A comprehensive review of shared autonomous vehicles

Deema Almaskati1Sharareh Kermanshachi2( )Apurva Pamidimukkala3
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington 76019, USA
Office of Research and Outreach, Pennsylvania State University, Middletown 17057, USA
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington 76019, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

The mobility landscape is experiencing major changes due to two emerging transportation trends, autonomous vehicles (AVs) and on-demand transportation, and the convergence of these smart mobility innovations as shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) can considerably alter travel behavior and consequently the ecological and societal aspects of the transportation sector. On-demand autonomous mobility is a promising transportation mode, but further research is necessary to evaluate its various aspects and implications prior to widespread adoption. Thus, this study investigates the effects of integrating automation and on-demand mobility by analyzing the effects on the environment, public transportation, land use, vehicle ownership, and public acceptance. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and through a detailed review of 210 articles, the impacts of each of these categories were determined and classified according to their causes, and the number of publications with which they were cited in the literature was determined. The review showed that SAVs can either positively or negatively impact categories and have the potential to minimize mobility obstacles and transportation inequity if legislators use technology to develop a better transportation system by initiating effective policies that govern the four impacted areas. A list of 22 policy recommendations designed to avoid the negative consequences of SAVs by maximizing the benefits of the technology while limiting the associated risks was also identified. The findings of this review will be beneficial to AV manufacturers, transportation professionals, and especially policymakers, who play an integral role in shaping how society benefits from SAV technology.

References

 
Arbib, J., Seba, T., 2017. Rethinking Transportation 20202030. California, USA: RethinkX, 143–144.
 
Arif Khan, M., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Foss, A., Hladik, G., 2022. Demand-responsive transit (DRT) services vs. fixed route transit: An exploratory study of university students. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development, 77–87.
 
Bertolini, L., 2017. Planning the mobile metropolis: Transport for people, places and the planet. Transport Rev, 38, 678−679.
 
Brown, A., Gonder, J., Repac, B., 2014. An analysis of possible energy impacts of automated vehicles. In: Road Vehicle Automation. Berlin: Springer, 137–153.
 
Clewlow, R. R., Mishra, G. S., 2017. Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. UCD-ITS-RR-17-07.
 

Emory, K., Douma, F., Cao, J., 2022. Autonomous vehicle policies with equity implications: Patterns and gaps. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 13, 100521.

 
Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Foss, A., 2023. Capturing the Behavioral Determinant behind the Use and Adoption of Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAVs). In: Transportation Research Board 102 Annual Meeting, 23-00181.
 

Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Ketankumar Patel, R., Kermanshachi, S., Michael Rosenberger, J., Weinreich, D., Foss, A., 2021. Integration of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) into existing transportation services: A focus group study. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 12, 100481.

 

Feng, L., Betts, J. M., Le Vu, H., 2020. Modeling the Impact of Shared Autonomous Vehicles on Land Prices in Clayton, Victoria. In: Bridging Transportation Researchers Conference, 2020, 1−14.

 

Fidanoğlu, A., Gokasar, I., Deveci, M., 2023. Integrating shared autonomous vehicles in Last-Mile public transportation. SETA, 57, 103214.

 
Fournier, G., Pfeiffer, C., Baumann, M., Worner, R., 2017. Individual mobility by shared autonomous electric vehicle fleets: Cost and CO2 comparison with internal combustion engine vehicles in Berlin, Germany. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), 368–376.
 
Fulton, L., Mason, J., Meroux, D., 2017. Three revolutions in urban transportation: How to achieve the full potential of vehicle electrification, automation, and shared mobility in urban transportation systems around the world by 2050. STEPS 2050.
 
Grush, B., Niles, J., 2018. The End of Driving: Transportation Systems and Public Policy Planning for Autonomous Vehicles. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
 
Grush, B., Niles, J., Baum, E., 2016. Ontario Must Prepare for Vehicle Automation. Toronto, CA: Centre for Urban Research and Land Development.
 
Hao, M., Yamamoto, T., 2017. Analysis on supply and demand of shared autonomous vehicles considering household vehicle ownership and shared use. In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 185–190.
 
Jäger, B., Agua, F. M. M., Lienkamp, M., 2017. Agent-based simulation of a shared, autonomous and electric on-demand mobility solution. In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 250–255.
 

Kaplan, L., Helveston, J. P., 2023. Undercutting transit? Exploring potential competition between automated vehicles and public transportation in the United States. Transp Res Rec, 2678, 656−673.

 
Keeney, T., 2017. Mobility-as-a-service: Why self-driving cars could change everything. ARK Investment Management Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4073151
 

Manders, T., Cox, R., Wieczorek, A., Verbong, G., 2020. The ultimate smart mobility combination for sustainable transport? A case study on shared electric automated mobility initiatives in the Netherlands. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 5, 100129.

 
Massar, M., Reza, I., Rahman, S. M., Abdullah, S. M. H., Jamal, A., Al-Ismail, F. S., 2021. Impacts of autonomous vehicles on greenhouse gas emissions-positive or negative? Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18, 5567.
 
Morrow, W. R., Greenblatt, J. B., Sturges, A., Saxena, S., Gopal, A., Millstein, D., et al., 2014. Key factors influencing autonomous vehicles’ energy and environmental outcome. In: Road Vehicle Automation, 127–135.
 

Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., Hladik, G., 2023. Evaluation of barriers to electric vehicle adoption: A study of technological, environmental, financial, and infrastructure factors. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, 22, 100962.

 

Patel, R. K., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Michael Rosenberger, J., Foss, A., 2023. Exploring People’s attitudes and perceptions of using shared autonomous vehicles: A focus group study. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development, 231−240.

 
Patel, R. K., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Kermanshachi, S., Michael Rosenberger, J., Foss, A., 2022. Impacts of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) on individuals’ travel behavior: Evidence from a pilot project. In: Automated People Movers and Automated Transit Systems, 71–80.
 
Salazar, M., Rossi, F., Schiffer, M., Onder, C. H., Pavone, M., 2018. On the interaction between autonomous mobility-on-demand and public transportation systems. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2262–2269.
 

Si, H., Duan, X., Cheng, L., De Vos, J., 2024. Adoption of shared autonomous vehicles: Combined effects of the external environment and personal attributes. TBS, 34, 100688.

 

Stein, G. M., 2020. The impact of autonomous vehicles on urban land use patterns. Fla St UL Rev, 48, 193.

 
Tscharaktschiew, S., Reimann, F., 2022. Less workplace parking with fully autonomous vehicles? J Intell Connect Veh, 5, 283–301.
 

Wang, K., Akar, G., 2019. Factors affecting the adoption of autonomous vehicles for commute trips: An analysis with the 2015 and 2017 puget sound travel surveys. Transp Res Rec, 2673, 13−25.

 

Wang, J., Zhang, L., Huang, Y., Zhao, J., Bella, F., 2020a. Safety of autonomous vehicles. J Adv Transp, 2020, 1−13.

 

Wang, Z., Safdar, M., Zhong, S., Liu, J., Xiao, F., 2021. Public preferences of shared autonomous vehicles in developing countries: A cross-national study of Pakistan and China. J Adv Transp, 2021, 1−19.

 
Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., 2017. Parking spaces in the age of shared autonomous vehicles: How much parking will we need and where? Transport Res Rec, 2651, 80–91.
 

Zhao, L., Malikopoulos, A. A., 2020. Enhanced mobility with connectivity and automation: A review of shared autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Intell Transport Syst Mag, 14, 87−102.

Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
Pages 177-189
Cite this article:
Almaskati D, Kermanshachi S, Pamidimukkala A. Convergence of emerging transportation trends: A comprehensive review of shared autonomous vehicles. Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles, 2024, 7(3): 177-189. https://doi.org/10.26599/JICV.2023.9210043

181

Views

18

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 11 October 2023
Revised: 23 November 2023
Accepted: 22 March 2024
Published: 26 September 2024
© The author(s) 2023.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return