AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (966.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review Article | Open Access

Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and management of split cord malformation

Bo Xiu1( )Fuyun Liu2Aijia Shang3Rui Zhang4
Department of Neurosurgery, The 7th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Zhengzhou University The 3rd Hospital, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan, China
Department of Neurosurgery, The 1st Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
Department of Neurosurgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Ji'nan 250021, Shandong, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Split cord malformation (SCM) is a neural tube defect that the spinal cord is longitudinally separated into two hemicords with individual functions, which causes severe spinal cord impairment and sensorimotor deficit. As a kind of myelodysplasia and a special type of tethered cord syndrome, SCM is not widely understood, and common issues in the diagnosis and treatment of SCM should be clarified. In this paper, the Chinese Split Cord Malformation Working Group made a consensus for SCM on embryopathogenesis and types, clinical presentations, neuroimaging assessment, indications and principle of the surgery, surgical techniques and nuances, and prognosis and follow up.

References

[1]
E Saker, M Loukas, C Fisahn, et al. Historical perspective of split cord malformations: A tale of two cords. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2017, 52(1): 1-5.
[2]
R Babu, R Reynolds, JR Moreno, et al. Concurrent split cord malformation and teratoma: Dysembryology, presentation, and treatment. J Clin Neurosci. 2014, 21(2): 212-6.
[3]
JF Bentley, JR Smith. Developmental posterior enteric remnants and spinal malformations: the split notochord syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1960, 35: 76-86.
[4]
D Pang, MS Dias, M Ahab-Barmada. Split cord malformation: Part I: a unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery. 1992, 31(3): 451-480.
[5]
YG Luo, W Li, CQ Dong, et al. The clinical characteristics and surgical treatment of split cord malformation in children (in Chinese). J Clin Ped Sur. 2013, 12(1): 31-35.
[6]
S Sinha, D Agarwal, AK Mahapatra. Split cord malformations: an experience of 203 cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006, 22(1): 3-7.
[7]
F Feng, HN Tan, XY Li, et al. Radiographic characteristics in congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation: a retrospective study of 266 surgical cases. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017, 18(1): 420.
[8]
B Xiu. Common problems and countermeasures in the diagnoses and treatment of split cord malformations (in Chinese). J Clin Pediatr Surg. 2019, 18(2): 84-87.
[9]
BS Lan, KZ Wang, AQ Liu, et al. Pathological factors and treatment of nerve injury of diastenatomyelia (in Chinese). J Clin Orth. 2002, 5(2): 94-97.
[10]
RK Meena, RS Doddamani, HK Gurjar, et al. Type 1.5 split cord malformations: An uncommon entity. World Neurosurg. 2020, 133: 142-149.
[11]
P Salunke, P Kovai, V Malik, et al. Mixed split cord malformation: are we missing something? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011, 113(9): 774-778.
[12]
AK Mahapatra. Split cord malformation - A study of 300 cases at AIIMS 1990-2006. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2011, 6(Suppl 1): S41-S45.
[13]
WM Hu, P Liu, FY Liu,et al. Clinical analysis of 225 cases of split cord malformation in children (in Chinese). Chin J Pediatr Surg. 2018, 39(3): 204-208.
[14]
B Xiu. A practical classification of spinal neural tube defects and its clinical significance (in Chinese). Chin J Neurosurg Dis Res. 2017, 16(5): 393-396.
[15]
D Pang. Split cord malformation: Part II: Clinical syndrome. Neurosurgery. 1992, 31(3): 481-500.
[16]
Y Erşahin. Split cord malformation types I and II: a personal series of 131 patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013, 29(9): 1515-1526.
[17]
J Rokos. Pathogenesis of diastematomyelia and spina bifida. J Pathol. 1975, 117(3): 155-161.
[18]
AN Guthkelch. Diastematomyelia with median septum. Brain. 1974, 97: 729-742.
[19]
F Feng, JX Shen, JG Zhang, et al. Characteristics and clinical relevance of the osseous spur in patients with congenital scoliosis and split spinal cord malformation. J Bone Jo Surg. 2016, 98(24): 2096-2102.
[20]
JL Heemskerk, MC Kruyt, D Colo, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for neural axis anomalies in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine J. 2018, 18(7): 1261-1271.
[21]
B Cheng, Y Li, KZ Wang, et al. Single tubular type of dia stematomyelia a retrospective study of 23 cases (in Chinese). Chin J Orthop. 2003, 23(5): 275-278.
[22]
FY Liu, XL Chen. Diagnosis and treatment of split spinal cord malformations combined with congenital spinal deformity (in Chinese). Chin J Appl Clin Pediatr. 2016, 31(11): 805-809.
[23]
BM Kline-Fath, MA Calvo-Garcia, SM O'Hara, et al. Water imaging (hydrography) in the fetus: The value of a heavily T2-weighted sequence. Pediatr Radiol. 2007, 37(2): 133-140.
[24]
B Xiu. Attention should be paid to standardizing the classification of spinal canal malformation (in Chinese). Natl Med J China. 2017, 97(48): 3761-3762.
[25]
FY Liu, XF Luo, B Xia, et al. Clinical study of congenital scoliosis with intraspinal deformity in children (in Chinese). Orthopedic J Chin. 2012, 20(9): 789-791.
[26]
HM Jin, LP Sun, N Bao, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diastematomyeliain children (in Chinese). Chin J Pediastr Surg. 2003, 24(5): 430-432.
[27]
AJ Shang, YZ Zhang, GY Qiao, et al. Surgical treatment of split cord malformation (in Chinese). J Chin PLA Postgrad Med Sch. 2010, 31(4): 307-308, 311.
[28]
D Pang. Ventral tethering in split cord malformation. Neurosurg Focus. 2001, 10(1): e6.
[29]
FY Liu, B Xia, PC Si, et al. Management of split cord malformations associated with other deformities in children (in Chinese). Orthopedic J China. 2006. 14(11): 808-811.
[30]
M Barutcuoglu, M Selcuki, D Selcuki, et al. Cutting filum terminale is very important in split cord malformation cases to achieve total release. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015, 31(3): 425-432.
[31]
M Barutçuoğlu, AS Umur, S Özdemir, et al. Double split cord malformations in a child: Types I and II at 2 different levels in the same route: Report of a rare case. Neurosurg Q. 2015, 25(4): 495-498.
[32]
GYF Lee, G Paradiso, CH Tator, et al. Surgical management of tethered cord syndrome in adults: Indications, techniques, and long-term outcomes in 60 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006, 4: 123-131.
[33]
E Ozturk, G Sonmez, H Mutlu, et al. Split-cord malformation and accompanying anomalies. J De Neuroradiol. 2008, 35(3): 150-156.
[34]
JX Shen, JG Zhang, F Feng, et al. Corrective surgery for congenital scoliosis associated with split cord malformation: It may be safe to leave diastematomyelia untreated in patients with intact or stable neurological status. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016, 98(11): 926-936.
[35]
H Hui, HR Tao, XF Jiang, et al. Safety and efficacy of 1-stage surgical treatment of congenital spinal deformity associated with split spinal cord malformation. Spine. 2012, 37(25): 2104-2113.
[36]
M Ayvaz, N Akalan, M Yazici, et al. Is it necessary to operate all split cord malformations before corrective surgery for patients with congenital spinal deformities? Spine. 2009, 34(22): 2413-2418.
[37]
ZQ Cui, B Xiu, ZX Sun, et al. Microsurgical treatment of type I diastematomyelia in 75 children (in Chinese). Chin J Neurosurg. 2012, 28(7): 710-713.
[38]
Pediatric Neurosurgery Expert Committee of Neurosurgeon Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Common types of congenital spina bifida and expert consensus on surgical strategies (in Chinese). Chin J Neurosurg. 2016, 32(4): 331-335.
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Pages 83-92
Cite this article:
Xiu B, Liu F, Shang A, et al. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and management of split cord malformation. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2020, 8(2): 83-92. https://doi.org/10.26599/JNR.2020.9040010

924

Views

39

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 26 April 2020
Revised: 03 June 2020
Accepted: 24 June 2020
Published: 04 August 2020
© The authors 2020

This article is published with open access at http://jnr.tsinghuajournals.com

Return