AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (885.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Cognitive performance in high school students after short treatment of zazen meditation technic

Pedro L. Linares1Silvia G. Ratti1,2Edgardo O. Alvarez1( )
Laboratorio de Epigénesis y Neuropsicofarmacología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Católica de Cuyo, sede San Luis, San Luis, Argentina
Área de Farmacología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina
Show Author Information

Abstract

Zazen is one of several meditation technics that pretends to reach calmness, reducing interference, and controlling awareness practiced by many people in the world. Zazen practitioners claim that a natural sense of wellbeing, spontaneous joy and self-fulfilling is achieved with its practice. Neuroscientific evidence shows that important modifications in the neuronal electric activity with compromise of several brain structures has been observed, especially those that are involved in modulation of attention. Our laboratory was interested to study the possible behavioural effects of a short time zazen practice to a group of secondary students of public or private high schools, with no previous training in any meditation technics. Two groups, 15-17 years old coursing the 4th or 5th year of their secondary study, one receiving zazen training (n = 31), and the other one recreation activities (n = 45) were selected. All subjects were tested with the Tower of London, Tower of Hanoi, Wisconsin Card Sorting and Stroop test to evaluate the cognitive abilities, at the beginning of the experiment (t0) and at the end of the experiment (t1, about 3 months later). Results showed that in the Tower of London and Tower of Hanoi, zazen group displayed significant less movements to solve the task, compared to Control. No differences were found between both groups in solving the Wisconsin Card Sorting test, but in the Stroop test zazen group was superior to Control in making significant less mistakes during solving the task. Results are compatible with a positive effect of zazen training in behavioural abilities of attention and planning strategies in secondary students.

References

[1]
Fiorentini A, Ora J, Tubani L. Autonomic system modification in Zen practitioners. Indian J Med Sci 2013, 67(7/8): 161-167.
[2]
Gillani NB, Smith JC. Zen meditation and ABC relaxation theory: an exploration an exploration of relaxation states, beliefs, dispositions, and motivations. J Clin Psychol 2001, 57(6): 839-846.
[3]
Faber PL, Lehmann D, Gianotti LRR, et al. Zazen meditation and no-task resting EEG compared with LORETA intracortical source localization. Cogn Process 2015, 16(1): 87-96.
[4]
Deshmukh VD. Neuroscience of meditation. Scientific World J 2006, 6: 2239-2253.
[5]
Pokorski M, Suchorzynska A. Psychobehavioral effects of meditation. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018, 1023: 85-91
[6]
Peressutti C, Martín-Gonzáles JM, García Manso JM, et al. Heart rate dynamics in different levels of Zen meditation. Int J Cardiol 2010, 145(1): 142-146
[7]
Chiesa A. Zen meditation: an integration of current evidence. J Altern Compl Med 2009, 15(5): 585-592.
[8]
Hauswald A, Übelacker T, Leske S, et al. What it means to be Zen: marked modulations of local and interareal synchronization during open monitoring meditation. Neuroimage 2015, 108: 265-273.
[9]
Austin JH. Zen and the brain: Toward an understanding of meditation and consciousness. MA: MIT Press, 1998.
[10]
Austin JH. Zen and the brain: mutually illuminating topics. Frontiers Psychol 2013, 4: 1-9.
[11]
Tang YY, Lu QL, Fan M, et al. Mechanisms of white matter changes induced by meditation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2012, 109(26): 10570-10574.
[12]
Deshimaru T. La Práctica del Zen. Barcelona: Kairós, 2011.
[13]
Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philo Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1982, 298(1089): 199-202.
[14]
Hinz A. The Tower of Hanoi. L'Enseignement Mathématique 1989, 35: 289-321.
[15]
Grant DA, Berg EA. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. J Expl Psychol 1948, 38(4): 404-411.
[16]
Berg EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol 1948, 39(1): 15-22.
[17]
Miller EK, Wallis JD. The prefrontal cortex and executive brain functions. In Fundamental Neuroscience. Squire LR, Bloom FE, McConnell SK, et al, Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003.
[18]
Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935, 18(6): 643-662.
[19]
Jensen AR, Rohwer WD Jr.. The Stroop color-word test: a review. Acta Psychol 1996, 25(1): 36-93.
[20]
Pasquini HA, Tanaka GK, Hindi-Basile LF, et al. Electrophysiological correlates of long-term Soto Zen meditation. Biomed Res Int 2015, 2015: 598496.
[21]
Sobolewski A, Holt E, Kublik E, et al. Impact of meditation on emotional processing: A visual ERP study. Neurosci Res 71(1): 44-48.
[22]
Hölzel BK, Carmody J, Vangel M, et al. Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain grey matter density. Psychiatry Res 2011, 191(1): 36-43.
[23]
Tei S, Faber PL, Lehmann D, et al. Meditators and non-meditators: EEG source imaging during resting. Brain Topogr 22(3): 158-165.
[24]
Tang Y, Lu Q, Geng X, et al. Short-term meditation induces white matter changes in the anterior cingulate Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107(35): 15649-15652.
[25]
Lee DJ, Kulubya E, Goldin P, et al. Review of the neural oscillations underlying meditation. Front Neurosci 2018, 12: 178.
[27]
Lazar SW, Kerr CE, Wasserman RH, et al. Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. Neuroreport 2005, 16(17): 1893-1897.
[28]
Grant JA, Courtemanche J, Duerden EG, et al. Cortical thickness and pain sensitivity in Zen meditators. Emotion 2010, 10(1): 43-53.
[29]
Posner MI, Peterson SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 1990, 13: 25-42.
[30]
Monchi O, Petrides M, Petre V, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event- related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 2001, 21(19): 7733-7741.
[31]
Smith EE, Jonides J. Executive control and thought. In Fundamental Neuroscience. Squire LR, Bloom FE, McConnell SK, et al., Eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003.
[32]
Köstering L, Schmidt CSM, Egger K, et al. Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the Tower of London task (TOL-F). Neuropsychologia 2015, 75: 646-655.
[33]
Unterrainer JM, Rahm B, Loosli SV, et al. Psychometric analyses of the Tower of London planning task reveal high reliability and feasibility in typically developing children and child patients with ASD and ADHD. Child Neuropsychol 2020, 26(2): 257-273.
[34]
Schnirman GM, Welsh MC, Retzlaff PD. Development of the tower of london-revised. Assessment 1998, 5(4): 355-360.
[35]
Pagnoni G, Cekic M, Guo Y. “Thinking about not- thinking”: neural correlates of conceptual processing during Zen meditation. PLoS One 2008, 3(9): e3083.
[36]
Scarpina F, Tagini S. The Stroop color and word test. Front Psychol 2017, 8: 557.
[37]
Yadav RK, Magan D, Mehta N, et al. Efficacy of a short-term yoga-based lifestyle intervention in reducing stress and inflammation: preliminary results. J Altern Complement Med 2012, 18(7): 662-667.
[38]
Fernandes CA, Nóbrega YKM, Tosta E. Pranic meditation affects phagocyte functions, and hormonal levels of recent practitioners. J Altern Complement Med 18(8): 761-768.
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Pages 219-228
Cite this article:
Linares PL, Ratti SG, Alvarez EO. Cognitive performance in high school students after short treatment of zazen meditation technic. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2021, 9(4): 219-228. https://doi.org/10.26599/JNR.2021.9040013

880

Views

104

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 09 February 2021
Revised: 30 June 2021
Accepted: 16 July 2021
Published: 04 January 2022
© The authors 2021

This article is published with open access at http://jnr.tsinghuajournals.com

Return