Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
This study aims to evaluate and compare the profilometry and atomic force microscopy (AFM) for characterization of biomaterial surfaces.
The clinically commonly used titanium (Ti) was used as the specimen. Each of the specimen was prepared by different grits of sandpapers, including 2000, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 220, 180, and 100 grits. An unpolished Ti plate served as the control. Surface characterization of the Ti specimens was examined using profilometry and AFM.
Both profilometry and AFM were capable of producing two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) topography. The scanning speed of profilometry (12 ± 5 s/image) was faster than that of AFM (250 ± 50 s/image) (p < 0.01). The resolution of AFM was relatively higher than profilometry. AFM produced more precise value, especially at nano-scale. When the Ti surface roughness was less than 0.2 μm, the results of surface roughness measured by profilometry and AFM were similar (mean difference = 0.01 ± 0.03, p = 0.81). When the Ti surface roughness was more than 0.3 μm, the surface roughness measured by profilometry was slightly higher than that by AFM (mean difference = 0.43 ± 0.15, p = 0.04).
Profilometry and AFM are both useful techniques for the characterization of biomaterial surfaces. Profilometry scanned faster than the AFM but produced less detailed surface topography. Both technologies provided similar measurement when the roughness was less than 0.2 μm. When the Ti surface roughness was more than 0.3 μm, the surface roughness measured by profilometry was slightly higher than that by AFM.
Portan, D. V.; Kroustalli, A. A.; Deligianni, D. D.; Papanicolaou, G. C. On the biocompatibility between TiO2 nanotubes layer and human osteoblasts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2012, 100A, 2546–2553.
Elias, C. N.; Meirelles, L. Improving osseointegration of dental implants. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 2010, 7, 241–256.
Méndez-Vilas, A.; Donoso, M. G.; González-Carrasco, J. L.; González-Martín, M. L. Looking at the micro-topography of polished and blasted Ti-based biomaterials using atomic force microscopy and contact angle goniometry. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 2006, 52, 157–166.
Canabarro, A.; Figueiredo, F.; Paciornik, S.; De-Deus, G. Two- and three-dimensional profilometer assessments to determine titanium roughness. Scanning 2009, 31, 174–179.
Kournetas, N.; Spintzyk, S.; Schweizer, E.; Sawada, T.; Said, F.; Schmid, P.; Geis-Gerstorfer, J.; Eliades, G.; Rupp, F. Comparative evaluation of topographical data of dental implant surfaces applying optical interferometry and scanning electron microscopy. Dent. Mater. 2017, 33, e317–e327.
Tholt, B.; Miranda-Júnior, W. G.; Prioli, R.; Thompson, J.; Oda, M. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer. Oper. Dent. 2006, 31, 442–449.
Vieira, T. I.; de Sousa Andrade, K. M.; Cabral, L. M.; Valença, A. M. G.; Maia, L. C.; Batista, A. U. D. Linear and areal surface roughness assessments for the study of tooth wear in human enamel. Clin. Oral Investig. 2023, 27, 329–338.
Yılmaz, C.; Kanık, Ö. Investigation of surface roughness values of various restorative materials after brushing with blue covarine containing whitening toothpaste by two different methods: AFM and profilometer. Microsc. Res. Technol. 2022, 85, 521–532.
Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; Gerber, C. Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 930–933.
Pantić, M.; Mitrović, S.; Babić, M.; Jevremović, D.; Kanjevac, T.; Džunić, D.; Adamović, D. AFM surface roughness and topography analysis of lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Tribol. Ind. 2015, 37, 391–399.
Santos, S.; Barcons, V.; Christenson, H. K.; Font, J.; Thomson, N. H. The intrinsic resolution limit in the atomic force microscope: Implications for heights of nano-scale features. PLoS One. 2011, 6, e23821.
Guo, T.; Wang, S. M.; Dorantes-Gonzalez, D. J.; Chen, J. P.; Fu, X.; Hu, X. T. Development of a hybrid atomic force microscopic measurement system combined with white light scanning interferometry. Sensors 2012, 12, 175–188.
Kroeger, M. E.; Sorenson, B. A.; Thomas, J. S.; Stojković, E. A.; Tsonchev, S.; Nicholson, K. T. Atomic force microscopy of red-light photoreceptors using peakforce quantitative nanomechanical property mapping. J. Vis. Exp. 2014, e52164.
Karatas, O.; Gul, P.; Gündoğdu, M.; Iskenderoglu, D. T. An evaluation of surface roughness after staining of different composite resins using atomic force microscopy and a profilometer. Microsc. Res. Technol. 2020, 83, 1251–1259.
Deligianni, D. D.; Katsala, N.; Ladas, S.; Sotiropoulou, D.; Amedee, J.; Missirlis, Y. F. Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 1241–1251.
Elias, C. N.; Oshida, Y.; Lima, J. H. C.; Muller, C. A. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2008, 1, 234–242.
Liu, Y. P.; Zhu, D. K.; Gilbert, J. L. Sub-nano to nanometer wear and tribocorrosion of titanium oxide-metal surfaces by in situ atomic force microscopy. Acta Biomater. 2021, 126, 477–484.
Guan, G. Z.; He, Y.; Mei, L. Atomic force microscopy: A nanobiotechnology for cellular research. Nano TransMed 2022, 1, e9130004.
Fandridis, J.; Papadopoulos, T. Surface characterization of three titanium dental implants. Implant Dent. 2008, 17, 91–99.
Kakaboura, A.; Fragouli, M.; Rahiotis, C.; Silikas, N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2007, 18, 155–163.
Takechi-Haraya, Y.; Usui, A.; Izutsu, K. I.; Abe, Y. Atomic force microscopic imaging of mRNA-lipid nanoparticles in aqueous medium. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, 112, 648–652.
Ridolfi, A.; Caselli, L.; Montis, C.; Mangiapia, G.; Berti, D.; Brucale, M.; Valle, F. Gold nanoparticles interacting with synthetic lipid rafts: An AFM investigation. J. Microsc. 2020, 280, 194–203.
Semenov, D. V.; Nippolainen, E.; Kamshilin, A. A. Accuracy and resolution of a dynamic-speckle profilometer. Appl. Opt. 2006, 45, 411–418.
Liao, H. S.; Cheng, S. H.; Hwu, E. T. Method for film thickness mapping with an astigmatic optical profilometer. Sensors 2022, 22, 2865.
The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.