AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (13.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Novel Parameter Identification Method for Basis Weight Control Loop of Papermaking Process

Yunzhu Shen1Wei Tang1( )Yungang Liu2
School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, 710021, China
School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan, Shandong Province, 250061, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The basis weight control loop of the papermaking process is a non-linear system with time-delay and time-varying. It is impractical to identify a model that can restore the model of real papermaking process. Determining a more accurate identification model is very important for designing the controller of the control system and maintaining the stable operation of the papermaking process. In this study, a strange nonchaotic particle swarm optimization (SNPSO) algorithm is proposed to identify the models of real papermaking processes, and this identification ability is significantly enhanced compared with particle swarm optimization (PSO). First, random particles are initialized by strange nonchaotic sequences to obtain high-quality solutions. Furthermore, the weight of linear attenuation is replaced by strange nonchaotic sequence and the time-varying acceleration coefficients and a mutation rule with strange nonchaotic characteristics are utilized in SNPSO. The above strategies effectively improve the global and local search ability of particles and the ability to escape from local optimization. To illustrate the effectiveness of SNPSO, step response data are used to identify the models of real industrial processes. Compared with classical PSO, PSO with time-varying acceleration coefficients (PSO-TVAC) and modified particle swarm optimization (MPSO), the simulation results demonstrate that SNPSO has stronger identification ability, faster convergence speed, and better robustness.

References

[1]
AmmarM E, DumontG. Identification of paper machines cross-directional models in closed-loop. In the 2013 5th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC) ICMIC, Cairo, Egypt: 2013, 3-9.
[2]

Sun G, Nie H, Su Y, Nie W. Research on two-degree-of-freedom IMC-PID control for time-delay systems. Application Research of Computers, 2014, 31(8), 2357-2360.

[3]

Shan W, Tang W, Wang M, Liu B. Two-degree-of-freedom smith predictor based on fractional order PID controller in paper basis weight. Packaging Engineering, 2017, 38(11), 143-147.

[4]

Xu Y, Chen D. Partially-linear least-squares regularized regression for system identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2009, 54(11), 2637-2641.

[5]

Chen T, Ljung L. Implementation of algorithms for tuning parameters in regularized least squares problems in system identification. Automatica, 2013, 49(7), 2213-2220.

[6]

Poinot T, Trigeassou J C. Identification of fractional systems using an output-error technique. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2004, 38(1/4), 133-154.

[7]

Silva W. Identification of nonlinear aeroelastic systems based on the volterra theory: progress and opportunities. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2005, 39(1/2), 25-62.

[8]

Gibson S, Wills A, Ninness B. Maximum-likelihood parameter estimation of bilinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005, 50(10), 1581-1596.

[9]

Soderstrom T, Hong M, Schoukens J, Pintelon R. Accuracy analysis of time domain maximum likelihood method and sample maximum likelihood method for errors-in-variables and output error identification. Automatica, 2010, 46(4), 721-727.

[10]

Gu Y, Ding R. A least squares identification algorithm for a state space model with multi-state delays. Applied Mathematics Letters, 2013, 26(7), 748-753.

[11]

Tao L, Gao F. A frequency domain step response identification method for continuous-time processes with time delay. Journal of Process Control, 2010, 20(7), 800-809.

[12]

Na J, Ren X, Xia Y. Adaptive parameter identification of linear SISO systems with unknown time-delay. Systems & Control Letters, 2014, 66, 43-50.

[13]

Ahandani M A, Abbasfam J, Kharrati H. Parameter identification of permanent magnet synchronous motors using quasi-opposition-based particle swarm optimization and hybrid chaotic particle swarm optimization algorithms. Applied Intelligence, 2022, 52, 13082-13096.

[14]

Zhu M, Axel H, Wen Y. Identification-based controller design using cloud model for course-keeping of ships in waves. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 75, 22-35.

[15]

Lagos-Eulogio P, Seck-Tuoh-Mora J C, Hernandez-Romero N, Medina-Marin J. A new design method for adaptive IIR system identification using hybrid CPSO and DE. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 88(4), 2371-2389.

[16]

Prawin J, Rao A, Lakshmi K. Nonlinear parametric identification strategy combining reverse path and hybrid dynamic quantum particle swarm optimization. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2015, 84(4), 797-815.

[17]

Peng Y, He S, Sun K. Parameter identification for discrete memristive chaotic map using adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2021, 107(1), 1263-1275.

[18]

Wang J, Xu Y, She C, Xu P, Bagal H A. Optimal parameter identification of SOFC model using modified gray wolf optimization algorithm. Energy, 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122800.

[19]

Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, 4, 1942-1948.

[20]

Cox C, Tindle J, Burn K. A comparison of software-based approaches to identifying FOPDT and SOPDT model parameters from process step response data. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2016, 40(1), 100-114.

[21]

Zou D, Deb S, Wang G. Solving IIR system identification by a variant of particle swarm optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 30(3), 685-698.

[22]

Feng Y, Li Y, Liang M. System Identification of micro piezoelectric actuators via rate-dependent prandtl-ishlinskii hysteresis model based on a modified PSO algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2020, DOI: 10.1109/TNANO.2020.3034965.

[23]

Shen Y, Zhang Y. Mechanisms of strange nonchaotic attractors in a nonsmooth system with border-collision bifurcations. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 96(2), 1405-1428.

[24]

Danca M F, Feckan M, Kuznetsov N, Chen G. Rich dynamics and anticontrol of extinction in a prey-predator system. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 98(2), 1421-1445.

[25]

Yuan Y, Miao P, Xie J. Coexistence of strange nonchaotic attractors and a special mixed attractor caused by a new intermittency in a periodically driven vibro-impact system. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 87(2), 1-21.

[26]

Shen Y, Zhang Y. Strange nonchaotic attractors in a quasiperiodically-forced piecewise smooth system with farey tree. Fractals, 2019, DOI: 10.1142/S0218348X19501184.

[27]

Li G, Yue Y, Grebogi C, Li D, Xie J. Strange nonchaotic attractors and multistability in a two-degree-of-freedom quasiperiodically forced vibro-impact system. Fractals, 2021, DOI: 10.1142/S0218348X21501036.

[28]

Zhang Y, Shen Y. A new route to strange nonchaotic attractors in an interval map. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2020, DOI: 10.1142/S0218127420500637.

[29]

Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Moradi-Dalvand M, Rabiee A. Combined heat and power economic dispatch problem solution using particle swarm optimization with time varying acceleration coefficients. Electric Power Systems Research, 2013, 95, 9-18.

[30]

Lu Q, Han Q, Liu S. A finite-time particle swarm optimization algorithm for odor source localization. Information Sciences, 2014, 277(1), 111-140.

[31]

Ahmed Z, Mahbub M, Jahan S. Defense against SYN flood attack using LPTR-PSO: a three phased scheduling approach. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2017, 8(9), 433-441.

[32]

Jamali S, Shaker V. Defense against SYN flooding attacks: a particle swarm optimization approach. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2014, 40(6), 2013-2025.

[33]

Gaxiola F, Melin P, Valdez F, Castro J R, Castillo O. Optimization of type-2 fuzzy weights in backpropagation learning for neural networks using GAs and PSO. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 38, 860-871.

Paper and Biomaterials
Pages 35-49
Cite this article:
Shen Y, Tang W, Liu Y. Novel Parameter Identification Method for Basis Weight Control Loop of Papermaking Process. Paper and Biomaterials, 2023, 8(1): 35-49. https://doi.org/10.26599/PBM.2023.9260004

839

Views

87

Downloads

0

Crossref

2

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 14 November 2022
Accepted: 24 December 2022
Published: 25 January 2023
© 2023 Paper and Biomaterials Editorial Board

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Return