AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
Simulating suffusion involves computing both the seepage flow of pore water in soil and the transport of fine particles with pore water flow. Since the conventional finite element method (FEM) exhibits instability when used to solve the pure transport equations, a staggered method that employs FEM to solve the seepage equation and the finite volume method (FVM) for the particle transport equation is proposed. As conventional FEM cannot provide a locally conservative velocity field that satisfies the input requirement of FVM, an algorithm, based on the global re-balance of the element residual fluxes, is employed to correct the flow velocity at element boundaries. With this algorithm, the local conservation of the flow velocity computed by FEM at the element boundary is achieved. This enables FVM to solve the particle transport equation on the same FEM mesh, facilitating the convenient integration of FVM with existing FEM codes. Case studies demonstrate that the proposed local conservation algorithm and the staggered method exhibit high computational efficiency and acceptable accuracy, offering a straightforward and practical approach to simulating suffusion problems.
LUO Yu-long, ZHANG Xing-jie, ZHANG Hai-bin, et al. Review of suffusion in deep alluvium foundation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(11): 3094−3106.
JIAN Bin-tian, LU Xiao-bing, WANG Shu-yun, et al. The movement of fine grains and its effects on the landslide and debris flow caused by raining[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(7): 1014−1016.
STERPI D. Effects of the erosion and transport of fine particles due to seepage flow[J]. International Journal Geomechanics, 2003, 3(1): 111−122.
CIVIDINI A, GIODA G. Finite-element approach to the erosion and transport of fine particles in granular soils[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2004, 4(3): 191−198.
HU Ya-yuan, MA Pan. Mechanism study and finite element simulation of three-phase coupling seepage erosion piping[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(4): 913−921.
WU Meng-xi, YU Ting, ZHANG Qi. Finite element simulation of influence of deep overburden suffusion on dam stress and deformation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(7): 2087−2094.
SCHEPERBOER I C, SUIKER A S J, BOSCO E, et al. A coupled hydro-mechanical model for subsurface erosion with analyses of soil piping and void formation[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17: 4769−4798.
ZHANG Lei, ZHANG Lu-lu, CHENG Yan, et al. Slope stability under rainfall infiltration considering internal erosion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1680−1687.
YANG J, YIN Z Y, LAOUAFA F, et al. Internal erosion in dike-on-foundation modeled by a coupled hydromechanical approach[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2019, 43: 663−683.
YU C C, HEINRICH J C. Petrov-Galerkin method for multidimensional, time-dependent, convective-diffusion equations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24: 2201−2215.
LENG Y, TIAN X, DEMKOWICZ L, et al. Petrov-Galerkin method for nonlocal convection-dominated diffusion problems[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 452: 110919.
BERGER R C, HOWINGON S E. Discrete fluxes and mass balance in finite elements[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002, 128(1): 87−92.
DAWSON C, SUN S, WHEELER M F. Compatible algorithms for coupled flow and transport[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2004, 193(23-26): 2565−2580.
BREZZI F, FORTIN M. Mixed and hybrid finite element methods[M]. New York: Springer, 1991.
ARNOLD D N. An interior penalty finite element method with discontinuous elements[J]. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1982, 19(4): 743−760.
WANG J, YE X. A weak Galerkin finite element method for second order elliptic problems[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2013, 241: 103−115.
BUSH L, GINTING V. On the application of the continuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation problems[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2013, 35(6): A2953−A2975.
DENG Q, GINTING V, MCCASKILL B. Construction of locally conservative fluxes for high order continuous Galerkin finite element methods[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2019, 359: 166−181.
SUK H, YEH G, CHEN J. Achieving local mass conservation when using continuous Galerkin finite element methods to solve solute transport equations with spatially variable coefficients in a transient state[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 595(1): 126038.
WU Q, ZHAO Y, LIN Y, et al. Locally conservative groundwater flow in the continuous Galerkin method using 3-D prismatic patches[J]. Water Resources Research, 2016, 52(11): 9182−9189.
FUJISAWA K, MURAKAMI A, NISHIMURA S. Numerical analysis of the erosion and the transport of fine particles within soils leading to the piping phenomenon[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2010, 50(4): 471−482.
SCHAUFLER A, BECKER C, STEEB H. Infiltration processes in cohesionless soils[J]. ZAMM Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2013, 93: 138−146.
CARMAN P C. Permeability of saturated sands, soils and clays[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1939, 29(2): 263−273.
LARSON M, NIKLASSON A. A conservative flux for the continuous Galerkin method based on discontinuous enrichment[J]. Calcolo, 2004, 41(2): 65−76.
SUN S, WHEELER M F. Projections of velocity data for the compatibility with transport[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 195(7−8): 653−673.
京公网安备11010802044758号