AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (340.2 KB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Case Study | Open Access

To Gain Legitimacy in Validity: The Path Selection of Localization Development of Social Enterprises in China

He Liang

Abstract

Under the analytical framework of new institutionalism, legitimacy has a decisive influence on the survival practice of organizations. However, social enterprises are still a relatively new thing in China, and their legitimacy has a certain ambiguity. Studying the legal acquisition path of social enterprises under the current institutional environment in China can effectively promote the standardized development of social enterprises. Articles equipped with "consciousness - entrepreneurship and mission to build - robustness development" characteristics of the local social enterprises typical case, the classical theory of political organization promotion to social enterprise research category, analysis and organization legitimacy fuzzy system under legitimacy can assign a top-down social legitimacy building enterprise strategy and the theory explanation. The findings: Through the function of organizing flexible and practical effectiveness to win major related group of its organizational behavior identity, generated and accumulated organizational behavior legitimacy, which in the system environment has provided the safeguard for the organization’s survival and development, which can be summed up as gain legitimacy and effectiveness in the model for the development of Chinese social enterprises localization is of high reference value. This paper also expands the reunderstanding of the connotation of validity under the model of cumulative validity. This paper is helpful to enhance the understanding of the development path of local social enterprises at the present stage and provide a cutting-edge model for social entrepreneurs.

References

 
Chen, Y., Xu, X.M. & Tan, L.B. (2012). A review on legitimacy in the organizational institution theory. East China Economic Management, 10, 137-142.
 
Cai, H. (2012). Validity and legitimacy of national governance: a rethink of the articles by Zhou Xueguang and Feng Renzhen. Open Times, 2, 135-143.
 
Gao, B.Z. (2000). On the legitimacy of social groups. Social Sciences in China, 2, 100-109 & 207.
 
Jiao, H., Sun, C. & Peng, S.M. (2012). Research on governance mechanism of the stakeholders of social enterprises based on legitimacy theory: the case of Creditease Group. Journal of Management Case Studies, 5, 333-343.
 
Liu, X.X. (2012). Social enterprises: the legitimacy dilemma and solutions. Study and Practice, 10, 95-103.
 
Li, J.H., Jing, R.T. * Lu, F.M. (2014). Legitimacy building of hybrid social organizations: a case study of China’s One Foundation. China Soft Science, 6, 67-80.
 
Lin, S.L. (2009). Legitimacy accumulated with effectiveness: the pathway choice of Chinese political development. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2, 46-54.
 
Spear, R. & Liang, H. (2018). On the external support ecosystem of social enterprises. Jianghai Academic Journal, 3, 32-37.
 
Shi, Y.R. & Wang, A.Y. (2016). Social enterprises and social governance innovation. Theoretical Investigation, 3, 141-144.
 
Xie, K., Liu, Y., Xiao, J.H. & Liu, Y.P. (2017). Construction of government-backed self-governing organizations: a case study on food safety co-governance in Shenzhen. Management World, 8, 64-80 & 105.
 
Yin, R. K. (2004). The Case Study Anthology. CA: Sage Publications Inc.
 
Yin, R.K. (2008). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. CA: Sage Publications Inc.
THE CHINA NONPROFIT REVIEW
Article number: 6
Cite this article:
Liang H. To Gain Legitimacy in Validity: The Path Selection of Localization Development of Social Enterprises in China. THE CHINA NONPROFIT REVIEW, 2021, 13(1&2): 6. https://doi.org/10.26599/TCNR.2021.0000006

907

Views

100

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

2

Scopus

Altmetrics

Published: 01 January 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.
Return