PDF (309.3 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Perspective | Open Access | Online First

Can we develop better international research collaboration on decarbonization?

The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

International research collaboration on decarbonization is needed if emissions reduction targets are to be achieved at the pace required and with lowest cost to all. While international exchanges on decarbonization still flourish amidst rising geopolitical challenges, whether these exchanges can result in effective collaboration remains unclear. This article reviews the current state and challenges, and proposes potential areas for international research collaboration on decarbonization. While countries are collaborating on research projects such as carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), hydrogen, and materials development, collaboration mainly occurs as loosely coordinated activity between research groups, over relatively short time periods, at relatively modest scale, and still lack the degree of technical leadership and direction needed for effective delivery. These are due to multiple challenges in implementation and coordination, such as operation under different research systems, funding mechanisms and national priorities. This article perceives several opportunities for future international research collaboration on decarbonization, including disruptive technology innovations in different sectors, means for their efficient deployment at pace and scale, and policy planning on carbon budget.

References

[1]
GISTEMP Team. (2024). GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP), version 4. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/.
[2]

Lenssen, N., Schmidt, G. A., Hendrickson, M., Jacobs, P. H., Menne, M., Ruedy, R. (2024). A NASA GISTEMPv4 observational uncertainty ensemble. J Geophys Res Atmos, 129: e2023JD040179.

[3]
Ritchie, H. , Rosado, P. , Roser, M. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/greenhouse-gas-emissions.
[4]
Nivard, M. , Smeets, B. , Tryggestad, C. , van de Giessen, P. , van der Meijden, R. (2023). Global energy perspective 2023: CO2 emissions outlook. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/global-energy-perspective-2023-co2-emissions-outlook.
[5]
Climate Action Tracker. (2023). 200 warming projections: emissions and expected warming based on pledges and current policies. https://climateactiontracker.org/global/temperatures/.
[6]
IEA. (2021). Net zero by 2050. Pairs. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.
[9]
[10]
Information on https://www.ier.org/org.
[11]
IEA. (2022). Solar PV global supply chains. Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv-global-supply-chains.
[12]

Bhattacharjee, S., Linley, S., Reisner, E. (2024). Solar reforming as an emerging technology for circular chemical industries. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 8: 87–105.

[13]

Escamilla, A., Sánchez, D., García-Rodríguez, L. (2022). Assessment of power-to-power renewable energy storage based on the smart integration of hydrogen and micro gas turbine technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47: 17505–17525.

[14]

Kildahl, H., Wang, L., Tong, L., Ding, Y. (2023). Cost effective decarbonisation of blast furnace–basic oxygen furnace steel production through thermochemical sector coupling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389: 135963.

[15]
Walker, A. What are carbon budgets, and how can they help us reach net zero? (2024). World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/03/carbon-budget-climate-change-net-zero/.
Technology Review for Carbon Neutrality
Cite this article:
Loughhead JN. Can we develop better international research collaboration on decarbonization?. Technology Review for Carbon Neutrality, 2024, https://doi.org/10.26599/TRCN.2025.9550002
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return