AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (988.6 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Effects of Power Inversion Spatial Only Adaptive Array on GNSS Receiver Measurements

Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Spatial Only Processing Power Inversion (SOP-PI) algorithm is frequently used in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) adaptive array receivers for interference mitigation because of its simplicity ofimplementation. This study investigates the effects of SOP-PI on receiver measurements for high-precisionapplications. Mathematical deductions show that if an array with a centro-symmetrical geometry is used, ideally, SOP-PI is naturally bias-free; however, this no longer stands when non-ideal factors, including array perturbations and finite-sample effect, are added. Simulations are performed herein to investigate how exactly the arrayperturbations affect the carrier phase biases, while diagonal loading and forward-backward averaging are proposed to counter the finite-sample effect. In conclusion, whether SOP-PI with a centro-symmetrical array geometry will satisfy the high precision demands mainly depends on the array perturbation degree of the element amplitude and the phase center.

References

[1]
Sklar R., Interference mitigation approaches for the global positioning system, Lincoln Laboratory Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 167179, 2003.
[2]
Cuntz M., Konovaltsev A., and Meurer M., Concepts, development, and validation of multiantenna GNSS receivers for resilient navigation, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 12881301, 2016.
[3]
Gupta J., Weiss M., and Morrison W., Desired features of adaptive antenna arrays for GNSS receivers, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 11951206, 2016.
[4]
Fernández-Prades C., Arribas J., and Closas P., Robust GNSS receivers by array signal processing: Theory and implementation, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 12071220, 2016.
[5]
Trees V. and Harry L., Optimum Array Processing: Part IV of Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory. Wiley, 2002.
[6]
Zoltowski M. and Gecan A., Advanced adaptive null steering concepts for GPS, in IEEE Military Communications Conference Record, 1995, pp. 12141218.
[7]
Fante R. and Vaccaro J., Wideband cancellation of interference in a GPS receive array, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 549564, 2000.
[8]
Gupta I. and Moore T., Space-frequency adaptive processing (SFAP) for radio frequency interference mitigation in spread-spectrum receivers, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 16111615, 2004.
[9]
Rife J., Khanafseh S., Pullen S., Lorenzo D., Kim U., Koenig M., Chiou T., Kempny B., and Pervan B., Navigation, interference suppression, and fault monitoring in the sea-based joint precision approach and landing system, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 19581975, 2008.
[10]
OBrien A. and Gupta I., Mitigation of adaptive antenna induced bias errors in GNSS receivers, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 524538, 2009.
[11]
Daneshmand S., Precise calibration of a GNSS antenna array for adaptive beamforming applications, Sensors, vol. 14, pp. 96699691, 2014.
[12]
O’Brien A., Adaptive antenna arrays for precision GNSS receivers, Ph D dissertation, Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, USA, 2009.
[13]
Gupta I., Church C., O’Brien A., and Slick C., Prediction of antenna and antenna electronics induced biases in GNSS receivers, in Proc. 2007 National Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, Monterey, CA, USA, 2007, pp. 650-656.
[14]
Church C., Estimation of adaptive antenna induced phase biases in global navigation satellite systems receiver measurements, PhD dissertation, Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering, The Ohio State University, USA, 2009.
[15]
Chuang C. and Gupta I., On-the-fly estimation of antenna induced biases in SFAP based GNSS antenna arrays, Navigation, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 323330, 2014.
[16]
Kaplan E. and Hegarty C., Understanding GPS : Principles and Applications. Artech House, 2005.
[17]
Petersen K. and Pedersen M., The Matrix Cookbook. Technical University of Denmark, 2008.
[18]
Misra P. and Enge P., Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance. Ganga-Jamuna, 2011.
[19]
China Satellite Navigation Office, BeiDou navigation satellite system signal in space interface control document, open service signal (version 2.1), Available: http://www.beidou.gov.cn/attach/2016/11/07/21212.pdf.
[20]
Carlson B., Covariance matrix estimation errors and diagonal loading in adaptive arrays, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 24, no.4, pp. 397401, 1988.
[21]
Li J., Stoica P., and Wang Z., On robust Capon beamforming and diagonal loading, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 51, no. 7, pp.17021715, 2003.
[22]
Carrie G., Vincent F., Deloues T., and Pietin D., Stabilizing the phase response of blind array processors for GNSS interference cancellation, Matrix, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 319323, 2006.
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 172-183
Cite this article:
Xu H, Cui X, Lu M. Effects of Power Inversion Spatial Only Adaptive Array on GNSS Receiver Measurements. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2018, 23(2): 172-183. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2018.9010019

812

Views

54

Downloads

9

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 17 January 2017
Accepted: 09 April 2017
Published: 02 April 2018
© The author(s) 2018
Return