AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Safety Analysis of the Eco-Approach and Departure Application at a Signalized Corridor

Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Bourns College of Engineering–Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA.
Show Author Information

Abstract

Various intelligent transportation systems and strategies for reducing vehicle fuel consumption andemissions have been developed. Energy and emissions could be reduced with the compromise of travel time in some environment-focused Connected Vehicle (CV) applications, which highlighted performance measures in terms of mobility and sustainability. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on safety assessment of such CV applications. In this study, a CV-based eco-driving application, namely, Eco-Approach and Departure (EAD), is selected as an example. A microscopic safety analysis tool, Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM), is utilized to assess the safety influence of EAD application in multiple scenarios. Further analysis is performed from two perspectives: (1) application users, i.e., EAD-equipped vehicles versus unequipped vehicles; and (2) traffic operators, i.e., overall traffic performance with and without the introduction of EAD. For each perspective, conflict statistics (e.g., frequency, time-to-collision distribution), overall and by type, are analyzed. Results indicate EAD is beneficial in improving the safety performance of equipped vehicles. The influence of EAD on overall traffic is scenario dependent, and a high penetration rate shows positive effects on network-wide safety benefits for most scenarios.

References

[1]
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy information ad-ministration, monthly energy review, https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/mer.pdf, 2017.
[2]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Inven-tory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2013, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/overview.pdf, 2015.
[3]
Ministration of Environmental Protection of the Peoples Republic of China, China vehicle emission annual report, http://wfs.mep.gov.cn/dq/jdc/zh/201601/-P020160115523794855203.pdf, 2015.
[4]
Hof T., Conde L., Garcia E., Iviglia A., Jamson S., Jopson A., Lai F., Merat N., Nyberg J., and Rios S., A state of the art review and user’s expectations, Comission eco-Driver Project, 2012.
[5]
Boriboonsomsin K., Barth M. J., Zhu W. H., and Vu A, Eco-routing navigation system based on multisource historical and real-time traffic information, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1694–1704, 2012.
[6]
Wu G. Y., Boriboonsomsin K., Zhang W. B., Li M., and Barth M., Energy and emission benefit comparison of stationary and in-vehicle advanced driving alert systems, Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2189, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2010.
[7]
Onoda T., IEA policies-G8 recommendations and an afterwards, Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 3823–3831, 2009.
[8]
Barth M., Mandava S., Boriboonsomsin K., and Xia H. T., Dynamic ECO-driving for arterial corridors, in Proc. 2011 IEEE Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems, Vienna, Austria, 2011, pp. 182–188.
[9]
Xia H. T., Boriboonsomsin K., Schweizer F., Winckler A., Zhou K., Zhang W. B., and Barth M., Field operational testing of eco-approach technology at a fixed-time signalized intersection, in Proc. 15th Int. IEEE Conf. Intelligent Transportation Systems, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2012, pp. 188–193.
[10]
Xia H. T., Boriboonsomsin K., and Barth M., Dynamic eco-driving for signalized arterial corridors and its indirect network-wide energy/emissions benefits, J. Intell. Transp. Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2013.
[11]
Caliendo C. and Guida M., Microsimulation approach for predicting crashes at unsignalized intersections using traffic conflicts, J. Transp. Eng., vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 1453–1467, 2012.
[12]
Huang F., Liu P., Yu H., and Wang W., Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections, Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 50, pp. 1014–1024, 2013.
[13]
Federal Highway Administration, Surrogate safety assessment model and validation: Final report, Publication No. FHWA-HRT-08-051, 2008.
[14]
Cunto F., Assessing safety performance of transportation systems using microscopic simulation, PhD dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada, 2008.
[15]
Yin Y. F., Liu H. X., Laval J. A., Lu X. Y., Li M., Pilachowski J., and Zhang W. B., Development of an integrated microscopic traffic simulation and signal timing optimization tool, PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2007-2, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2007.
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 157-171
Cite this article:
Li W, Wu G, Zhang Y, et al. Safety Analysis of the Eco-Approach and Departure Application at a Signalized Corridor. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2018, 23(2): 157-171. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2018.9010061

493

Views

25

Downloads

7

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 10 December 2016
Revised: 26 February 2017
Accepted: 07 March 2016
Published: 02 April 2018
© The author(s) 2018
Return