AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Tsinghua Science and Technology Article
PDF (10 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Application-Oriented Performance Comparison of 802.11p and LTE-V in a V2V Communication System

Department of Automation, Tsinghua University National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Nanjing 210096
Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute (TBSI), Shenzhen 518055, China.
Show Author Information

Abstract

In recent years, the Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication system has been considered one of the most promising technologies to build a much safer and more efficient transportation system. Both simulation and field test have been extensively performed to evaluate the performance of the V2V communication system. However, most of the evaluation methods are communication-based, and although in a transportation environment, lack a V2V application-oriented analysis. In this study, we conducted real-world tests and built an application-oriented evaluation model. The experiments were classified into four scenarios: static, following, face 2 face, and crossing vertically, which almost covered all the V2V communication patterns on the road. Under these scenarios, we conducted experiments and built a probability model to evaluate the performance of 802.11p and LTE-V in safety-related applications. Consequently, we found out that improvements are still needed in Non-Line-of-Sight scenarios.

Keywords

Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communicationconnected vehiclesperformance evaluationintelligent transportation systemapplication-oriented field test

References

[1]
Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications: Amendment: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE), IEEE P802.11p/D3.0, 2007.
Crossref
[2]
Wu X., Subramanian S., Guha R., White R. G., Li J., Lu K.W., Bucceri A., and Zhang T., Vehicular communications using DSRC: Challenges, enhancements, and evolution, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 399-408, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[3]
Araniti G., Campolo C., Condoluci M., Iera A., and Molinaro A., LTE for vehicular networking: A survey, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 148-157, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[4]
Architecture Enhancements for V2X Services (Release 14), 3GPP TS 23.285, V14.1.0, 2016.
Crossref
[5]
Study on LTE Support for Vehicle to Everything (V2X) Services (Release 14), 3GPP TR 22.885, V14.0.0, 2015.
Crossref
[6]
Araniti G., Campolo C., Condoluci M., Iera A., and Molinaro A., LTE for vehicular networking: A survey, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 148-157, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]
Tseng Y. L., LTE-advanced enhancement for vehicular communication, IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 4-7, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]
Vinel A., 3GPP LTE versus IEEE 802.11p/WAVE: Which technology is able to support cooperative vehicular safety applications? IEEE Wirel. Commun. Le., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 125-128, 2012.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]
Phan M. A., Rembarz R., and Sories S., A capacity analysis for the transmission of event and cooperative awareness messages in LTE networks, in 18th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Orlando, FL, USA, 2011.
[10]
Trichias K., Modeling and evaluation of LTE in intelligent transportation systems, master degree dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands, 2011.
[11]
Killat M. and Hartenstein H., An empirical model for probability of packet reception in vehicular ad hoc networks, EURASIP J. Wirel. Comm., vol. 2009, no. 4, pp. 1-12, 2009.
Crossref Google Scholar
[12]
Liu Y., Ozguner U., and Acarman T., Performance evaluation of inter-vehicle communication in highway systems and in urban areas, IEEE Proc. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 63-75, 2006.
Crossref Google Scholar
[13]
Yin J., ElBatt T., Yeung G., Ryu B., Habermas S., Krishnan H., and Talty T., Performance evaluation of safety applications over DSRC vehicular ad hoc networks, in Proc. 1st ACM Int. Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2004, pp. 1-9.
Crossref
[14]
Kiokes G., Amditis A., and Uzunoglu N. K., Simulation based performance analysis and improvement of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing-802.11p system for vehicular communications, Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 429-436, 2009.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
Saleh Y., Mahmood F., and Abderrahim B., Performance of beacon safety message dissemination in Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs), J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1990-2004, 2007.
Crossref Google Scholar
[16]
Khabazian M., Aissa S., and Mehmet-Ali M., Performance modeling of message dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks with priority, IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2011.
Crossref Google Scholar
[17]
Sharanappa P. H. and Mahabaleshwar S. K., Performance analysis of CSMA, MACA, and MACAW protocols for VANETs, Int. J. Future Comp. Commun., vol. 3, no. 2, 2014.
Crossref Google Scholar
[18]
Biddlestone S., Redmill K., Miucic R., and Ozguner U., An integrated 802.11p WAVE DSRC and vehicle traffics with experimentally validated urban (LOS and NLOS) propagation models, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1792-1802, 2012.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
Chen X. and Yao D., An empirically comparative analysis of 802.11n and 802.11p performances in CVIS, in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on ITS Telecommunications (ITST), Taipei, China, 2012. pp. 848-851.
[20]
Wang Y., Hu J., Zhang Y., and Xu C., Reliability evaluation of IEEE 802.11p-based vehicle-to-vehicle communication in an urban expressway, Tsinghua Sci. Technol., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 417-428, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[21]
Liu Z., Liu Z., Meng Z., Yang X., Pu L., and Zhang L., Implementation and performance measurement of a V2X communication system for vehicle and pedestrian safety, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. N., vol. 12, no. 9, 2016.
Crossref Google Scholar
[22]
Teixeira F. A., e Silva V. F., Leoni J. L., Macedo D. F., and Nogueira J. M., Vehicular networks using the IEEE 802.11p standard: An experimental analysis, Veh. Commun., no. 1, pp. 91-96, 2014.
Crossref Google Scholar
[23]
Sukuvaara T., Ylitalo R., and Katz M., IEEE 802.11p based vehicular networking operational pilot field measurement, IEEE J. Sel. Area. Comm., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 409-417, 2013.
Crossref Google Scholar
[24]
Bai F. and Krishnan H., Reliability analysis of DSRC wireless communication for vehicle safety applications, in IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 2006.
Crossref
[25]
Renda M. E., Resta G., Santi P., Martelli F., and Franchini A., IEEE 802.11p VANets: Experimental evaluation of packet inter-reception time, Comput. Commun., no. 75, pp. 26-38, 2015.
Crossref Google Scholar
[26]
Meng Z., Liu Z., Gu X., Pu L., Yang X., Qin Z., and Zhang L., Guaranteed V2V QoS services implementation and field measurements in hybrid WAVE/LTE environments, in 2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference, Macao, China, 2015, pp. 1-6.
[27]
Yin X., Ma X., Trivedi K.S., and Vinel A., Performance and reliability evaluation of BSM broadcasting in DSRC with multi-channel schemes, IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 3101-3113, 2014.
Crossref Google Scholar
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Volume 24 Issue 2,
April 2019
Pages 123-133
DOI: 10.26599/TST.2018.9010075
Cite this article:
Shi M, Zhang Y, Yao D, et al. Application-Oriented Performance Comparison of 802.11p and LTE-V in a V2V Communication System. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2019, 24(2): 123-133. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2018.9010075

633

Views

13

Downloads

14

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

16

Scopus

2

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 16 March 2017
Revised: 01 June 2017
Accepted: 14 June 2017
Published: 31 December 2018
© The author(s) 2019
Return