[1]
M., Zundert D. Sluijsmans, and J. Merrinboer, Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions, Learning and Instruction, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 270-279, 2010.
[2]
S. D. Thanga, Impact of formative assessment: Comparative analysis on the performance of bachelor of science in education students, presented at the National Meeting of JWS, Tokyo, Japan, 2015.
[3]
Z., Wang B., Fan X. J., Zhao H. W. Yue, and A. M. Klushin, Integrating formative and summative assessment, Oecd Education Working Papers, vol. 28, no. 58, pp. 10-11, 2011.
[4]
Y. Q., Wang H. Li, and Y. Liu, Assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review model: Implementation and experience report, Computers and Education, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 412-422, 2012.
[5]
I., Cabrera J. Villalon, and J. Chavez, Blending communities and team-based learning in a programming course, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 99, pp. 1-8, 2017.
[6]
M. Bernhart and T. Grechenig, On the understanding of programs with continuous code reviews, presented at the IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2013.
[7]
M. E. Fagan, Advances in software inspections to reduce errors in program development, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 182-211, 1976.
[8]
P. C. Rigby and C. Bird, Convergent contemporary software peer review practices, presented at the Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engi neering, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2013.
[9]
C., Hundhausen A. Agrawal, and M. Trevisan, Integrating pedagogical code reviews into a cs 1 course: An empirical study, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 291-295, 2009.
[10]
X. S. Li, Using peer review to assess coding standards: A case study, presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2007.
[11]
C. D., Hundhausen A. Agrawal, and P. Agarwal, Talking about code: Integrating pedagogical code reviews into early computing courses, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-28, 2013.
[12]
S., Sripada Y. R. Reddy, and A. Sureka, In support of peer code review and inspection in an undergraduate software engineering course, presented at the IEEE Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, Florence, Italy, 2015.
[13]
Y. Q., Wang Y. W. Liang, and Y. Liu, A multi-peer assessment platform for programming language learning: Considering group non-consensus and personal radicalness, Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2011-2031, 2015.
[14]
T., Wang X. Su, and K. Wang, Ability-training-oriented automated assessment in introductory programming course, Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 220-226, 2011.
[15]
Y. Q., Wang L., Hang Y. Sun, and Y. Jie, Learning outcomes of programming language courses based on peer code review model, presented at the International Conference on Computer Science and Education, Singapore, 2011.
[16]
M. Matthias, Two controlled experiments concerning the comparison of pair programming to peer review, Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 166-179, 2005.
[17]
H., Ponbarry W. L. Packard, and S. John, Expanding capacity and promoting inclusion in introductory computer science: A focus on near-peer mentor preparation and code review, Computer Science Education, vol. 27, pp. 1-24, 2017.
[18]
B. M. Corsatea and S. Walker, Opportunities for moodle data and learning intelligence in virtual environments, presented at the IEEE International Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems, Douai, France, 2015.
