AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (7.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Event-Related Potentials Analysis on Perception of Moving Object at Different Speeds

School of Information and Electronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100084, China
School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100081, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

For this research, electroencephalography (EEG) was analyzed to investigate the perception ability of the brain for moving objects at different speeds. In this experiment, total six kinds of videos regarding license plates were created, moving at distinct speed of 0.26 m/s, 0.36 m/s, 0.46 m/s, 0.56 m/s, 0.66 m/s, and 0.76 m/s, respectively. In the semantic priming paradigm, the N400 effect was analyzed for each speed. The ERP results demonstrated that the N400 amplitude gradually reduced with increasing speed. At the three lower speeds, N400 was evoked evidently and mainly distributed in the centro-posterior region. At the three higher speeds, no significant N400 effect was found. The results concluded that the perception ability of the brain declined with the acceleration of the object’s moving speed and that the brain recognized the detailed information of the moving object when its speed was lower than 0.46 m/s.

References

[1]
E. Gopfert, R. Muller, and E. M. Simon, The human motion onset VEP as a function of stimulation area for foveal and peripheral vision, Doc Ophtalmol, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 165–173, 1990.
[2]
D. J. McKeefry, J. D. G. Watson, R. S. J. Frackowiak, K. Fong, and S. Zeki, The activity in human areas V1/V2, V3, and V5 during the perception of coherent and incoherent motion, NeuroImage, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 1997.
[3]
M. Wibral, C. Bledowski, A. Kohler, W. Singer, and L. Muckli, The timing of feedback to early visual cortex in the perception of long-range apparent motion, Cereb Cortex, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1567–1582, 2009.
[4]
E. Chong, A. M. Familiar, and W. M. Shim, Reconstructing representations of dynamic visual objects in early visual cortex, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, pp. 1453–1458, 2016.
[5]
P. Marlene and M. A. Justin, Neural responses to apparent motion can be predicted by responses to non-moving stimuli, NeuroImage, vol. 218, p. 116973, 2020.
[6]
B. R. Cottereau, S. P. McKee, and A. M. Norcia, Dynamics and cortical distribution of neural responses to 2D and 3D motion in human, Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 533–543, 2013.
[7]
L. Shen, W. Du, C. Wang, and G. Yue, Event-related potentials measurement of perception to 3D motion in depth, China Commun, vol. 12, pp. 86–93, 2015.
[8]
M. Kutas and S. A. Hillyard, Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity, Science, vol. 207, no. 4427, pp. 203–205, 1980.
[9]
Y. F. Lin, Z. W. Liu, and X. R. Gao, Sensitivity of N400 effect during speech comprehension under the uni- and bi-modality conditions, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 27, no.1, pp. 141–149, 2022.
[10]
M. Kutas and K. D. Federmeier, Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP), Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 62, no. 1, p. 621, 2011.
[11]
A. M. Proverbio and F. Riva, RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions, Neuroscience Letters, vol. 459, no. 3, pp. 142–146, 2009.
[12]
L. Amoruso, L. Sedeno, D. Huepe, A. Tomio, J. Kamienkowski, E. Hurtado, J. F. Cardona, M. A. A. Gonzalez, A. Rieznik, and M. Sigman, et al., Time to tango: Expertise and contextual anticipation during action observation, Neuroimage, vol. 98, pp. 366–385, 2014.
[13]
A. M. Proverbio, N. Crotti, M. Manfredi, R. Adorni, and A. Zani, Who needs a referee? How incorrect basketball actions are automatically detected by basketball players’ brain, Scientific Reports, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 883, 2012.
[14]
A. Orlandi, A. Zani, and A. M. Proverbio, Dance expertise modulates visual sensitivity to complex biological movements, Neuropsychologia, vol. 104, pp. 168–181, 2017.
[15]
W. C. Zhang, F. C. Sun, H. Wu, C. Q. Tan, and Y. Z. Ma, Asynchronous brain-computer interface shared control of robotic grasping, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 360–370, 2019.
[16]
A. Delorme and S. Makeig, EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2004.
[17]
Y. F. Lin, W. Wu, C. H. Wu, B. L. Liu, and X. R. Gao, Extraction of mismatch negativity using a resampling-based spatial filtering method, Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 026015, 2013.
[18]
S. P. Heinrich, D. Van, M. Bach, and M. B. Hoffmann, Electrophysiological evidence for independent speed channels in human motion processing, Journal of Vision, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 469–475, 2004.
[19]
S. L. Shishkin, I. P. Ganin, and A. Y. Kaplan, Event-related potentials in a moving matrix modification of the P300 brain-computer interface paradigm, Neuroscience Letters, vol. 496, no. 2, pp. 95–99, 2011.
[20]
B. T. Gold, D. A. Balota, S. J. Jones, D. K. Powell, C. D. Smith, and A. H. Andersen, Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions, Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 24, pp. 6523–6532, 2006.
[21]
J. Uusvuori, T. Parviainen, M. Inkinen, and R. Salmelin, Spatiotemporal interaction between sound form and meaning during spoken word perception, Cerebral Cortex, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 456–466, 2008.
[22]
P. Helenius, R. Salmelin, E. Service, and J. F. Connolly, Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex, Brain, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1133–1142, 1998.
[23]
E. Halgren, R. P. Dhond, N. Christensen, C. V. Petten, K. Marinkovic, J. D. Lewine, and A. M. Dale, N400-like magneto-ence-phalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences, Neuroimage, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1101–1116, 2002.
[24]
J. T. Devlin, H. L. Jamison, P. M. Matthews, and L. M. Gonnerman, From the cover: Morphology and the internal structure of words, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 101, no. 41, pp. 14984–14988, 2004.
[25]
T. F. Munte, T. P. Urbach and E. Duezel, M. Kutas, and F. Boller, Event-related brain potentials in the study of human cognition and neuropsychology, in Handbook of Neuropsychology, F. Boller and J. Grafman eds. New York, NY, USA: Elsevier, pp. 139–235, 2000.
[26]
C. T. Chang, C. Y. Lee, C. J. Chou, J. L. Fuh, and H. C. Wu, Predictability effect on N400 reflects the severity of reading comprehension deficits in aphasia, Neuropsychologia, vol. 81, pp. 127–138, 2016.
[27]
K. Trimmel, J. Sachsenweger, G. Lindinger, E. Auff, F. Zimprich, and E. Pataraia, Lateralization of language function in epilepsy patients: A high-density scalp-derived event-related potentials (ERP) study, Neurophysiol, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 472–479, 2017.
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 283-291
Cite this article:
Lin Y, Lu Z, Zhao Z, et al. Event-Related Potentials Analysis on Perception of Moving Object at Different Speeds. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2023, 28(2): 283-291. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2021.9010098

670

Views

50

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 07 September 2021
Revised: 18 November 2021
Accepted: 29 December 2021
Published: 29 September 2022
© The author(s) 2023.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return