AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (873.3 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Text Reasoning Chain Extraction for Multi-Hop Question Answering

Pengming Wang1Zijiang Zhu2( )Qing Chen3Weihuang Dai4
School of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325035, China
School of Computer Science, and also with Institute of Intelligent Information Processing, South China Business College, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510545, China
School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China, and also with School of Science, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
Institute of Intelligent Information Processing, South China Business College, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510545, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

With the advent of the information age, it will be more troublesome to search for a lot of relevant knowledge to find the information you need. Text reasoning is a very basic and important part of multi-hop question and answer tasks. This paper aims to study the integrity, uniformity, and speed of computational intelligence inference data capabilities. That is why multi-hop reasoning came into being, but it is still in its infancy, that is, it is far from enough to conduct multi-hop question and answer questions, such as search breadth, process complexity, response speed, comprehensiveness of information, etc. This paper makes a text comparison between traditional information retrieval and computational intelligence through corpus relevancy and other computing methods. The study finds that in the face of multi-hop question and answer reasoning, the reasoning data that traditional retrieval methods lagged behind in intelligence are about 35% worse. It shows that computational intelligence would be more complete, unified, and faster than traditional retrieval methods. This paper also introduces the relevant points of text reasoning and describes the process of the multi-hop question answering system, as well as the subsequent discussions and expectations.

References

[1]

H. F. Tsai and I. Wilkinson, The use of collaborative reasoning to promote the quality of text-based discussion: A case study in the Chinese community school, Int. J. Intell. Technol. Appl. Stat., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 283–299, 2018.

[2]

T. Liem, Intuitive beurteilung im kontext des clinical reasoning in der osteopathie, Osteopathische Med., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2018.

[3]

E. A. Bezlepkin and A. S. Zaykova, Neurophilosophy, philosophy of neuroscience, and philosophy of artificial intelligence: The problem of distinguishing, Russ. J. Philos. Sci., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2021.

[4]

A. List and H. Du, Reasoning beyond history: Examining students’ strategy use when completing a multiple text task addressing a controversial topic in education, Read. Writ., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1003–1048, 2021.

[5]

T. Petzoldt and K. Schleinitz, To text or not to text–drivers’ interpretation of traffic situations as the basis for their decision to (not) engage in text messaging, IET Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 1224–1229, 2019.

[6]

C. G. Schlottfeldt, M. Mansur-Alves, C. Flores-Mendoza, and C. J. Tierra-Criollo, Event-related potentials and intelligence among Brazilian schoolchildren: An exploratory study, Psychol. Neurosci., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 155–167, 2018.

[7]

E. V. Kotelnikov, TextJSM: Text sentiment analysis method, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2018.

[8]

O. Tsilmak, I. Shcherbakova, S. Berezka, Y. Formaniuk, L. Rudenko, and N. Mateiko, Classification of professionally important abilities and skills of a counseling psychologist, BRAIN. Broad Research Artificial Intelligence Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 363–379, 2021.

[9]

S. Yashchuk, O. Shapran, L. Martirosian, T. Petukhova, I. Artemieva, and Y. Kolisnyk-Humenyuk, Pedagogical design of the content of professional training of teachers of general technical disciplines and methods of teaching technology, BRAIN. Broad Research Artificial Intelligence Neuroscience, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 278–299, 2021.

[10]

K. Roman, Analysis and evaluation of the implementation level of the smart city concept in selected Polish cities, BRAIN. Broad Research Artificial Intelligence Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 138–145, 2018.

[11]

K. Nakamura, Information seeking criteria: Artificial intelligence, economics, psychology, and neuroscience, Rev. Neurosci., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2022.

[12]

J. Nudeshima, Ethical issues in artificial intelligence and neuroscience, Brain Nerve, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 715–722, 2019.

[13]

E. Wallace, P. Rodriguez, S. Feng, I. Yamada, and J. Boyd-Graber, Trick me if you can: Human-in-the-loop generation of adversarial examples for question answering, Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist., vol. 7, pp. 387–401, 2019.

[14]

J. W. Krakauer, A. A. Ghazanfar, A. Gomez-Marin, M. A. MacIver, and D. Poeppel, Neuroscience needs behavior: Correcting a reductionist bias, Neuron, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 480–490, 2017.

[15]

A. Eshghi, S. M. Mousavi, and V. Mohagheghi, A new interval type-2 fuzzy approach for analyzing and monitoring the performance of megaprojects based on earned value analysis (with a case study), Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5109–5133, 2019.

[16]

S. Kobayashi and A. Morita, The history of neuroscience and neurosurgery in Japan, Int. Neurosci. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2015.

[17]

J. M. P. Wilbiks, D. T. Vuvan, P. Y. Girard, I. Peretz, and F. A. Russo, Effects of vocal training in a musicophile with congenital amusia, Neuron, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 526–537, 2016.

[18]

D. Hassabis, D. Kumaran, C. Summerfield, and M. Botvinick, Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence, Neuron, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 245–258, 2017.

[19]

M. Diwakar, P. Singh, and A. Shankar, Modified handshake protocol-based secure authentication using blockchain technology in WLAN, Int. J. Electron. Bus., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 305–317, 2022.

[20]
K. Koga, I. Yao, M. Setou, and M. Zhuo, SCRAPPER selectively contributes to spontaneous release and presynaptic long-term potentiation in the anterior cingulate cortex, J. Neurosci., vol. 37, no. 14, pp. 3887–3895, 2017.
[21]

J. Bruineberg and T. Froese, Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action and the embodied mind, Int. J. Perform. Arts Digit. Medium., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 215–217, 2016.

[22]

A. D. Lien and M. Scanziani, Publisher correction: Tuned thalamic excitation is amplified by visual cortical circuits, Nat. Neurosci., vol. 21, no. 9, p. 1292, 2018.

Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 959-970
Cite this article:
Wang P, Zhu Z, Chen Q, et al. Text Reasoning Chain Extraction for Multi-Hop Question Answering. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2024, 29(4): 959-970. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010060

408

Views

92

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 06 April 2023
Revised: 02 June 2023
Accepted: 12 June 2023
Published: 09 February 2024
© The Author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of theCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return