AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

A Local Differential Privacy Trajectory Protection Method Based on Temporal and Spatial Restrictions for Staying Detection

College of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
School of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
Department of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The widespread availability of GPS has opened up a whole new market that provides a plethora of location-based services. Location-based social networks have become very popular as they provide end users like us with several such services utilizing GPS through our devices. However, when users utilize these services, they inevitably expose personal information such as their ID and sensitive location to the servers. Due to untrustworthy servers and malicious attackers with colossal background knowledge, users’ personal information is at risk on these servers. Unfortunately, many privacy-preserving solutions for protecting trajectories have significantly decreased utility after deployment. We have come up with a new trajectory privacy protection solution that contraposes the area of interest for users. Firstly, Staying Points Detection Method based on Temporal-Spatial Restrictions (SPDM-TSR) is an interest area mining method based on temporal-spatial restrictions, which can clearly distinguish between staying and moving points. Additionally, our privacy protection mechanism focuses on the user’s areas of interest rather than the entire trajectory. Furthermore, our proposed mechanism does not rely on third-party service providers and the attackers’ background knowledge settings. We test our models on real datasets, and the results indicate that our proposed algorithm can provide a high standard privacy guarantee as well as data availability.

References

[1]
Y. Huang, Y. J. Li, and Z. Cai, Security and privacy in metaverse: A comprehensive survey, Big Data Mining and Analytics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 234247, 2023.
[2]
O. Abul, F. Bonchi, and M. Nanni, Never walk alone: Uncertainty for anonymity in moving objects databases, in Proc. 2008 IEEE 24th Int. Conf. Data Engineering, Cancun, Mexico, 2008, pp. 376385.
[3]
P. Samarati and L. Sweeney, Generalizing data to provide anonymity when disclosing information, in Proc.17th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Seattle, WA, USA, 1998, pp. 188201.
[4]
O. Abul, F. Bonchi, and M. Nanni, Anonymization of moving objects databases by clustering and perturbation, Inf. Syst., vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 884910, 2010.
[5]
N. Mohammed, B. C. M. Fung, and M. Debbabi, Walking in the crowd: Anonymizing trajectory data for pattern analysis, in Proc. 18th ACM Conf. Information and Knowledge Management, Hong Kong, China, 2009, pp. 14411444.
[6]
R. Chen, B. C. M. Fung, N. Mohammed, B. C. Desai, and K. Wang, Privacy-preserving trajectory data publishing by local suppression, Inf. Sci., vol. 231, pp. 8397, 2013.
[7]
S. Papadopoulos, S. Bakiras, and D. Papadias, Nearest neighbor search with strong location privacy, Proc. VLDB Endow., vol. 3, nos. 1&2, pp. 619629, 2010.
[8]
S. Yang, C. Ma, and C. Zhou, SL-Cloak: PIR technology based stochastic location cloaking method, in Proc. Int. Conf. Computer, Network Security and Communication Engineering, Shenzhen, China, 2014, pp. 395399.
[9]
J. Freudiger, M. Raya, and M. Feleghhazi, Mix-zones for location privacy in vehicular networks, presented at WiN-ITS, Vancouver, Canada, 2007.
[10]
I. Memon, H. T. Mirza, Q. A. Arain, and H. Memon, Multiple mix zones de-correlation trajectory privacy model for road network, Telecommun. Syst., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 557582, 2019.
[11]
C. Dwork, Differential privacy in new settings, in Proc. Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Austin, TX, USA, 2010, pp.174183.
[12]
K. Zhang, Z. Tian, Z. Cai, and D. Seo, Link-privacy preserving graph embedding data publication with adversarial learning, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 244256, 2022.
[13]
R. Chen, B. C. M. Fung, and B. C. Desai, Differentially private trajectory data publication, arXiv preprint arXiv: 1112.2020, 2011.
[14]
Z. Cai, X. Zheng, J. Wang, and Z. He, Private data trading towards range counting queries in Internet of Things, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 48814897, 2023.
[15]
Z. Cai and Z. He, Trading private range counting over big IoT data, in Proc. 2019 IEEE 39th Int. Conf. Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Dallas, TX, USA, 2019, pp. 144153.
[16]
Z. Cai and X. Zheng, A private and efficient mechanism for data uploading in smart cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 766775, 2020.
[17]
X. Zheng and Z. Cai, Privacy-preserved data sharing towards multiple parties in industrial IoTs, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 968979, 2020.
[18]
R. Chen, B. C. M. Fung, B. C. Desai, and N. M. Sossou, Differentially private transit data publication: A case study on the Montreal transportation system, in Proc. 18th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Beijing, China, 2012, pp. 213221.
[19]
S. S. Ho and S. Ruan, Differential privacy for location pattern mining, in Proc. 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL Int. Workshop on Security and Privacy in GIS and LBS, Chicago, IL, USA, 2011, pp. 1724.
[20]
Y. Xiao and L. Xiong, Protecting locations with differential privacy under temporal correlations, in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conf. Computer and Communications Security, Denver, CO, USA, 2015, pp. 12981309.
[21]
L. Ou, Z. Qin, S. Liao, Y. Hong, and X. Jia, Releasing correlated trajectories: Towards high utility and optimal differential privacy, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 11091123, 2020.
[22]
Y. Wang, M. Li, S. Luo, Y. Xin, H. Zhu, Y. Chen, G. Yang, and Y. Yang, LRM: A location recombination mechanism for achieving trajectory k-anonymity privacy protection, IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 182886182905, 2019.
[23]
W. Zhang, G. Yin, Y. Sha, and J. Yang, Protecting the moving user’s locations by combining differential privacy and k-anonymity under temporal correlations in wireless networks, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 2021, pp. 112, 2021.
[24]
Z. Hu, J. Yang, and J. Zhang, Trajectory privacy protection method based on the time interval divided, Comput. Secur., vol. 77, pp. 488499, 2018.
[25]
L. Gong, H. Sato, T. Yamamoto, T. Miwa, and T. Morikawa, Identification of activity stop locations in GPS trajectories by density-based clustering method combined with support vector machines, J. Mod. Transp., vol. 23, pp. 202213, 2015.
[26]
T. Luo, X. Zheng, G. Xu, K. Fu, and W. Ren, An improved DBSCAN algorithm to detect stops in individual trajectories, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 63, 2017.
[27]
L. Bermingham and I. Lee, A probabilistic stop and move classifier for noisy GPS trajectories, Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 16341662, 2018.
[28]
P. Kairouz, S. Oh, and P. Viswanath, Extremal mechanisms for local differential privacy, in Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 2014, pp. 28792887.
[29]
W. Y. Gan, D. Y. Li, and J. M. Wang, An hierarchical clustering method based on data fields, Acta Electron. Sin., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 258262, 2006.
[30]
Z. Cai, Z. Xiong, H. Xu, P. Wang, W. Li, and Y. Pan, Generative adversarial networks: A survey toward private and secure applications, ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 138, 2021.
[31]
Y. Zheng, L. Zhang, X. Xie, and W. Y. Ma, Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories, in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, Madrid, Spain, 2009, pp. 791800.
[32]
Y. Zheng, Q. Li, Y. Chen, X. Xie, and W. Y. Ma, Understanding mobility based on GPS data, in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2008, pp. 312321.
[33]
Y. Zheng, X. Xie, and W. Y. Ma, GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory, IEEE Data Eng. Bull., vol. 33, pp.3239, 2010.
[34]
A. T. Palma, V. Bogorny, B. Kuijpers, and L. O. Alvares, A clustering-based approach for discovering interesting places in trajectories, in Proc. 2008 ACM Symp. on Applied computing, Fortaleza, Brazil, 2008, pp. 863868.
[35]
K. Gu, L. Yang, Y. Liu, and N. Liao, Trajectory data privacy protection based on differential privacy mechanism, in Proc. 2017 2nd Int. Conf. Reliability Engineering (ICRE 2017), Milan, Italy, 2017, pp. 122127.
[36]
Z. Cai, Z. He, X. Guan, and Y. Li, Collective data-sanitization for preventing sensitive information inference attacks in social networks, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 577590, 2018.
[37]
J. He, B. Gong, J. Yang, H. Wang, P. Xu, and T. Xing, ASCFL: Accurate and speedy semi-supervised clustering federated learning, Tsinghua Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 823837, 2023.
[38]
M. Yang, L. Huang, C. Tang, K-means clustering with local distance privacy, Big Data Mining and Analytics, .
[39]
K. Jiang, D. Shao, S. Bressan, T. Kister, and K. L. Tan, Publishing trajectories with differential privacy guarantees, in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2013, pp. 112.
[40]
P. Chen, J. Gu, D. Zhu, and F. Shao, A dynamic time warping based algorithm for trajectory matching in LBS, International Journal of Database Theory and Application, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3948, 2013.
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Pages 617-633
Cite this article:
Zhang W, Xie Z, Sai AMVV, et al. A Local Differential Privacy Trajectory Protection Method Based on Temporal and Spatial Restrictions for Staying Detection. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2024, 29(2): 617-633. https://doi.org/10.26599/TST.2023.9010072

541

Views

62

Downloads

4

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 21 June 2023
Revised: 12 July 2023
Accepted: 15 July 2023
Published: 22 September 2023
© The author(s) 2024.

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return