There are so many non-Newtonian fluids in our daily life, such as milk, blood, cytoplasm, and mucus, most of which are viscoelastic heterogeneous liquid containing cells, inorganic ion, metabolites, and hormones. In microfluidic microparticle-manipulating applications, the target particles are practically distributed within the biological fluids like blood and urine. The viscoelasticity of biological fluid is constantly ignored for simplicity especially when the fluid is substantially diluted and contains rather complex components. However, even the fluid’s ultraweak viscoelasticity actually affects the microparticle migration and may bring a completely different behavior compared with the Newtonian fluids. As a result, a robust and easy operated on-chip viscoelasticity sensor is potential and desired in many research and industrial fields, including assay sample preparation, clinical diagnostics, and on-chip sensor. In this work, we employed stable non-Newtonian fluid–polyethylene oxide (PEO) solutions with various concentrations to investigate and calibrate effects of the weak fluidic viscoelasticity on microparticle behaviors in a double-layered microfluidic channel. An analogy-based database of fluidic patterns for viscoelasticity sensing and relaxation time measurement was established. Then, we tested different biological fluids including blood plasma and fetal bovine serum and proved that they exhibited similar viscoelasticity effects to the PEO solutions with the corresponding concentration, which reached a good agreement with available results by references. The detection limitation of relaxation time can reach 1 ms. It promised a robust and integrated on-chip microfluidic viscoelasticity sensor for different biological fluids without complicated calculations.
Yan C, Pochan DJ. Rheological properties of peptide-based hydrogels for biomedical and other applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:3528–3540.
Dickinson E. Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocoll. 2003;17:25–39.
Del Giudice F. Simultaneous measurement of rheological properties in a microfluidic rheometer. Phys Fluids. 2020;32:052001.
Heinrich J, Balleisen L, Schulte H, Assmann G, van de Loo J. Fibrinogen and factor Ⅶ in the prediction of coronary risk. Results from the PROCAM study in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:54–59.
Yang S, Kim JY, Lee SJ, Lee SS, Kim JM. Sheathless elasto-inertial particle focusing and continuous separation in a straight rectangular microchannel. Lab Chip. 2011;11:266–273.
Lim EJ, Ober TJ, Edd JF, Desai SP, Neal D, Bong KW, Doyle PS, McKinley GH, Toner M. Inertio-elastic focusing of bioparticles in microchannels at high throughput. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4120.
Macosko CW. Rheology: Principles, measurements, and applications. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 1994.
Del Giudice F, D'Avino G, Greco F, De Santo I, Netti PA, Maffettone PL. Rheometry-on-a-chip: Measuring the relaxation time of a viscoelastic liquid through particle migration in microchannel flows. Lab Chip. 2015;15:783–792.
Nguyen N-T, Yap Y-F, Sumargo A. Microfluidic rheometer based on hydrodynamic focusing. Meas Sci Technol. 2008;19:085405.
Choi S, Park JK. Microfluidic rheometer for characterization of protein unfolding and aggregation in microflows. Small. 2010;6:1306–1310.
Pan L, Arratia PE. A high-shear, low Reynolds number microfluidic rheometer. Microfluid Nanofluid. 2013;14:885–894.
Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature. 2006;442:368–373.
Zilz J, Schäfer C, Wagner C, Poole RJ, Alves MA, Lindner A. Serpentine channels: Micro-rheometers for fluid relaxation times. Lab Chip. 2014;14:351–358.
Koser AE, Pan L, Keim NC, Arratia PE. Measuring material relaxation and creep recovery in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip. 2013;13:1850–1853.
Thurgood P, Suarez SA, Pirogova E, Jex AR, Peter K, Baratchi S, Khoshmanesh K. Tunable harmonic flow patterns in microfluidic systems through simple tube oscillation. Small. 2020;16:2003612.
Thurgood P, Concilia G, Tran N, Nguyen N, Hawke AJ, Pirogova E, Jex AR, Peter K, Baratchi S, Khoshmanesh K. Generation of programmable dynamic flow patterns in microfluidics using audio signals. Lab Chip. 2021;21:4672–4684.
Di Carlo D. Inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2009;9:3038–3046.
Segré G, Silberberg A. Radial particle displacements in Poiseuille flow of suspensions. Nature. 1961;189:209.
Segre G, Silberberg A. Behaviour of macroscopic rigid spheres in Poiseuille flow part 2. Experimental results and interpretation. J Fluid Mech. 1962;14:136–157.
Zhang J, Yan S, Yuan D, Alici G, Nguyen N-T, Warkiani ME, Weihua L. Fundamentals and applications of inertial microfluidics: A review. Lab Chip. 2016;16:10–34.
Asmolov ES. The inertial lift on a spherical particle in a plane Poiseuille flow at large channel Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 1999;381:63–87.
Gerlach T. Microdiffusers as dynamic passive valves for micropump applications. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 1998;69:181–191.
Pathak JA, Ross D, Migler KB. Elastic flow instability, curved streamlines, and mixing in microfluidic flows. Phys Fluids. 2004;16:4028–4034.
Ho B, Leal L. Migration of rigid spheres in a two-dimensional unidirectional shear flow of a second-order fluid. J Fluid Mech. 1976;76:783–799.
Villone MM, D’avino G, Hulsen MA, Greco F, Maffettone PL. Particle motion in square channel flow of a viscoelastic liquid: Migration vs. secondary flows. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2013;195:1–8.
Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O. Dynamics of polymeric liquids: Fluid mechanics. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 1987.
Leshansky AM, Bransky A, Korin N, Dinnar U. Tunable nonlinear viscoelastic “focusing” in a microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;98:234501.
Zhao Q, Zhang J, Yan S, Yuan D, Du H, Alici G, Weihua L. High-throughput sheathless and three-dimensional microparticle focusing using a microchannel with arc-shaped groove arrays. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41153.
Zhao Q, Yan S, Yuan D, Zhang J, Du H, Alici G, Weihua L. Double-mode microparticle manipulation by tunable secondary flow in microchannel with arc-shaped groove arrays. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2017;11:1406–1412.
Choi S, Song S, Choi C, Park J-K. Continuous blood cell separation by hydrophoretic filtration. Lab Chip. 2007;7:1532–1538.
Li F-C, Kinoshita H, Li X-B, Oishi M, Fujii T, Oshima M. Creation of very-low-Reynolds-number chaotic fluid motions in microchannels using viscoelastic surfactant solution. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2010;34:20–27.
Grilli M, Vázquez-Quesada A, Ellero M. Transition to turbulence and mixing in a viscoelastic fluid flowing inside a channel with a periodic array of cylindrical obstacles. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:174501.
Sousa PC, Pinho FT, Oliveira MSN, Alves MA. Extensional flow of blood analog solutions in microfluidic devices. Biomicrofluidics. 2011;5:014108.
Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ. Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29(5):435–450.
Wells RE, Merrill EW. Shear rate dependence of the viscosity of whole blood and plasma. Science. 1961;133:763–764.
Farrugia A. Albumin usage in clinical medicine: Tradition or therapeutic? Transfus Med Rev. 2010;24:53–63.
Brust M, Schaefer C, Doerr R, Pan L, Garcia M, Arratia P, Wagner C. Rheology of human blood plasma: Viscoelastic versus Newtonian behavior. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110:078305.