PDF (12.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Movement Optimization for a Cyborg Cockroach in a Bounded Space Incorporating Machine Learning

Mochammad Ariyanto1,2Chowdhury Mohammad Masum Refat1Kazuyoshi Hirao1Keisuke Morishima1()
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50275, Indonesia
Show Author Information

Abstract

Cockroaches can traverse unknown obstacle-terrain, self-right on the ground and climb above the obstacle. However, they have limited motion, such as less activity in light/bright areas and lower temperatures. Therefore, the movement of the cyborg cockroaches needs to be optimized for the utilization of the cockroach as a cyborg insect. This study aims to increase the search rate and distance traveled by cockroaches and reduce the stop time by utilizing automatic stimulation from machine learning. Multiple machine learning classifiers were applied to classify the offline binary classification of the cockroach movement based on the inertial measuring unit input signals. Ten time-domain features were chosen and applied as the classifier inputs. The highest performance of the classifiers was implemented for the online motion recognition and automatic stimulation provided to the cerci to trigger the free walking motion of the cockroach. A user interface was developed to run multiple computational processes simultaneously in real time such as computer vision, data acquisition, feature extraction, automatic stimulation, and machine learning using a multithreading algorithm. On the basis of the experiment results, we successfully demonstrated that the movement performance of cockroaches was importantly improved by applying machine learning classification and automatic stimulation. This system increased the search rate and traveled distance by 68% and 70%, respectively, while the stop time was reduced by 78%.

References

1
Tran-Ngoc PT, Le DL, Chong BS, Nguyen HD, Dung VT, Cao F, Li Y, Kai K, Gan JH, Vo-Doan TT, et al. Insect-computer hybrid system for autonomous search and rescue mission. arXiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.10869
2
Maharbiz MM. A cyborg beetle: Wireless neural flight control of a free-flying insect. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Symposium on Integrated Circuits and System Design: Chip on the Dunes; 2009 Aug 31–Sep 03; New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–4.
3
Dutta A. Cyborgs: Neuromuscular control of insects. Paper presented at: 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER); 2019 Mar 20–23; San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 682–685.
4

Li G, Zhang D. Brain-computer Interface controlled cyborg: Establishing a functional information transfer pathway from human brain to cockroach brain. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150667.

5

Nguyen HD, Tan PZ, Sato H, Vo-Doan TT. Sideways walking control of a cyborg beetle. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics. 2020;2(3):331–337.

6

Vo-Doan TT, Dung VT, Sato H. A cyborg insect reveals a function of a muscle in free flight. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022;2022:9780504.

7

Kosaka T, Gan JH, Umezu S, Sato H. Remote radio control of insect flight reveals why beetles lift their legs in flight while other insects tightly fold. Bioinspir Biomim. 2021;16(3):036001.

8

Li C, Wöhrl T, Lam HK, Full RJ. Cockroaches use diverse strategies to self-right on the ground. J Exp Biol. 2019;222(15):jeb186080.

9

Othayoth R, Li C. Propelling and perturbing appendages together facilitate strenuous ground self-righting. eLife. 2021;10:e60233.

10

Daltorio KA, Tietz BR, Bender JA, Webster VA, Szczecinski NS, Branicky MS, Ritzmann RE, Quinn RD. A model of exploration and goal-searching in the cockroach, Blaberus discoidalis. Adapt Behav.. 2013;21(5):404–420.

11
Wilson EO, Nalepa CA, Roth LM, Roth LM, Bell WJ, Bell WJ. Cockroaches: Ecology, behavior, and natural history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.
12

Clark AJ, Triblehorn JD. Mechanical properties of the cuticles of three cockroach species that differ in their wind-evoked escape behavior. PeerJ. 2014;2:e501.

13

Crall JD, Souffrant AD, Akandwanaho D, Hescock SD, Callan SE, Coronado WM, Baldwin MW, de Bivort BL, Social context modulates idiosyncrasy of behaviour in the gregarious cockroach Blaberus discoidalis. Anim Behav. 2016;111:297–305.

14
Madagascar hissing cockroaches: Information and care. Oklahoma State University. 01 Mar 2017. [accessed 05 Jul 2022] https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/madagascar-hissingcockroaches-information-and-care.html.
15

Rasakatla S, Suzuki T, Tenma W, Mizuuchi I, Indurkhya B. CameraRoach: A WiFi- and camera-enabled cyborg cockroach for search and rescue. J Robot Mechatron. 2022;34(1):149–158.

16
Latif T, Bozkurt A, Line following terrestrial insect biobots. Paper presented at: 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2012 Aug 28–Sep 01; San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 972–975.
17

Sanchez CJ, Chiu C-W, Zhou Y, González JM, Vinson SB, Liang H. Locomotion control of hybrid cockroach robots. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12(105):20141363.

18

Dutta A. Cyborg insects could someday save your life. IEEE Pulse. 2019;10(3):24–25.

19

Cole J, Bozkurt A, Lobaton E. Localization of biobotic insects using low-cost inertial measurement units. Sensors. 2020;20(16):4486.

20
Cole J, Mohammadzadeh F, Bollinger C, Latif T, Bozkurt A, Lobaton E. A study on motion mode identification for cyborg roaches. Paper presented at 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP); 2017 Mar 5–9; New Orleans, LA, USA. pp. 2652–2656.
21

Li Y, Sato H. Insect-computer hybrid robot. Mol Front J.. 2018;2(01):30–42.

22
Nirmal K, Sreejith AG, Mathew J, Sarpotdar M, Suresh A, Prakash A, Safonova M, Murthy J. Noise modeling and analysis of an IMU-based attitude sensor: Improvement of performance by filtering and sensor fusion. In: Advances in optical and mechanical technologies for telescopes and instrumentation II. Bellingham (DC): SPIE; 2016. vol. 9912, pp. 2138–2147.
23

Xia M, Xiu C, Yang D, Wang L. Performance enhancement of pedestrian navigation systems based on low-cost foot-mounted MEMS-IMU/ultrasonic sensor. Sensors. 2019;19(2):2.

24

Jeanson R, Blanco S, Fournier R, Deneubourg J-L, Fourcassié V, Theraulaz G. A model of animal movements in a bounded space. J Theor Biol. 2003;225(4):443–451.

25

Cvitanic T, Melkote S, Balakirsky S. Improved state estimation of a robot end-effector using laser tracker and inertial sensor fusion. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2022;38:51–61.

26

Rafatnia S, Mirzaei M. Estimation of reliable vehicle dynamic model using IMU/GNSS data fusion for stability controller design. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2022;168:108593.

27
Apte S, Meyer F, Gremeaux V, Dadashi F, Aminian K. A sensor fusion approach to the estimation of instantaneous velocity using single wearable sensor during Sprint. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020. [accessed 20 Dec 2022] https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00838.
28

Huai J, Lin Y, Zhuang Y, Toth CK, Chen D. Observability analysis and keyframe-based filtering for visual inertial odometry with full self-calibration. IEEE Trans Robot. 2022;38(5):3219–3237.

29

Duong HT, Suh YS. A human gait tracking system using dual foot-mounted IMU and multiple 2D LiDARs. Sensors. 2022;22(17):6368.

30

Chang D, Johnson-Roberson M, Sun J. An active perception framework for autonomous underwater vehicle navigation under sensor constraints. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2022;30(6):2301–2316.

31

Naheem K, Kim MS. A low-cost foot-placed UWB and IMU fusion-based indoor pedestrian tracking system for IoT applications. Sensors. 2022;22(21):8160.

32

Lara OD, Labrador MA. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor. 2013;15(3):1192–1209.

33

Skog I, Handel P, Nilsson J-O, Rantakokko J. Zero-velocity detection—An algorithm evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(11):2657–2666.

34

Shi W-T, Lyu Z-J, Tang S-T, Chia T-L, Yang C-Y. A bionic hand controlled by hand gesture recognition based on surface EMG signals: A preliminary study. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2018;38(1):126–135.

Cyborg and Bionic Systems
Article number: 0012
Cite this article:
Ariyanto M, Masum Refat CM, Hirao K, et al. Movement Optimization for a Cyborg Cockroach in a Bounded Space Incorporating Machine Learning. Cyborg and Bionic Systems, 2023, 4: 0012. https://doi.org/10.34133/cbsystems.0012
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return