AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (117.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Research on influencing factors of coupling in SIMO antenna

Jian SHEN
College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In the process of radar data acquisition, limited amount of information can be provided to post-processing interpretation by the data acquisition method of single-input and single-output, however, the location and physical parameter information of geological body can be obtained more accurately by using Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO) antenna with multiple transmitters and multiple receivers. Especially when collecting borehole radar data and the aperture is very narrow, but the antenna is required to be able to ensure better results in a larger frequency band, therefore, the size of the antenna will be greatly challenged. Meanwhile, the close arrangement of multiple transmitting and receiving antennas will inevitably affect the signal radiation. Based on the borehole radar, this paper simulates and optimizes the Single-Input Multi-Output antenna (SIMO antenna), the size of which meets the aperture requirements, using HFSS antenna simulation software, and explores the factors affecting the antenna return loss and isolation. Among them, the radius of the dipole has little effect on the return loss and isolation, whereas increasing the number of receiving antennas or increasing the transceiver distance will significantly affect the antenna coupling, with a significant reduction in the amplitude of isolation.

References

 

Ebihara S, Hanaoka H, Okumura K, et al. 2012. Interference criterion for coaxial-fed circular dipole array antenna in a borehole. IEEE, 50(9): 3510-3526.

 

Ebihara S, Kawai H, Wada K. 2013. Estimating 3-D position and inclination of a planar interface with directional bore-hole radar. Near Surface Geophysics, 11(2): 185-195.

 

Ebihara S. 2004. Directional borehole radar with dipole anten-na array using optical modulators. IEEE, 42(1): 45-58.

 

Grégoire C, Joesten P, Lane J. 2006. Use of borehole radar re-flection logging to monitor steam-enhanced remediation in fractured limestone-Results of numerical modelling and afield experiment. Geophysics, 60(1): 41-45.

 

Jang H, Kuroda S, Kim H. 2011. Efficient electromagnetic imaging of an artificial infiltration process in the vadose zone using cross-borehole radar. IEEE, 8(2): 243-247.

 

Kim S, Nam S. 2011. Short-time Fourier transform of deeply located tunnel signatures measured by cross-borehole pulse radar. IEEE, 8(3): 493-496.

 

Liang H, Yang H, Hou J, et al. 2013. A compact ferrite-based dipole directional antenna for borehole radar application. IEEE, 10(3): 486-489.

 

Liu S, Wu J, Zhou J, et al. 2011. Numerical simulations of bore-hole radar detection for metal ore. IEEE, 8(2): 308-312.

 

Mason I, Bray A, Sindle T, et al. 2008. The effect of conduc-tion on VHF radar images shot in water-filled boreholes. IEEE, 5(2): 304-307.

 

Sato M, Takayama T. 2007. A novel directional borehole radar system using optical electricfield sensors. IEEE, 45(8): 2529-2535.

 

Slob E, Sato M, Olhoeft G. 2010. Surface and borehole ground-penetrating-radar developments. Geophysics, 75(5): 103-120.

 

Takayama T, Sato M. 2007. A novel direction-finding algo-rithm for directional borehole radar. IEEE, 45(8): 2520-2528.

 

Zhao J, Sato T. 2006. Radar polarimetry analysis applied to single-hole fully polarimetric borehole radar. IEEE, 47(12): 3547-3554.

Global Geology
Pages 34-40
Cite this article:
SHEN J. Research on influencing factors of coupling in SIMO antenna. Global Geology, 2022, 25(1): 34-40. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-9736.2022.01.05

83

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

Altmetrics

Received: 04 December 2021
Revised: 15 January 2022
Published: 25 February 2022
© 2022 GLOBAL GEOLOGY
Return