AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Influence of Poloxamer 188 on Design and Develop-ment of Second Generation PLGA Nanocrystals of Metformin Hydrochloride

Bibhu Prasad Panda1( )Rachna Krishnamoorthy1Naveen Kumar Hawala Shivashekaregowda1Sujata Patnaik2
School of Pharmacy, Taylors University, Lakeside Campus, Selangor, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

The poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) based second-generation nanocrystals prepared by modified nanoprecipitation method, is the method of choice for encapsulation of both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs. In this study, nanoprecipitation technique was adopted to develop second generation nanocrystals of PLGA loaded with metformin HCl (MHc). Poloxamer 188 with three different concentrations (0.5, 0.75, 1% w/v) in combination with PLGA at 1, 2, 3% concentrations (w/v) successfully produced MHc loaded PLGA second generation nanocrystals. The effects of poloxamer 188, amphiphilic triblock copolymer on carrier particle size, surface morphology, polydispersity index, zeta potential, drug entrapment efficiency and drug release of nanoformulation were investigated. The optimized formulation of second-generation nanocrystals with concentrations 0.75% w/v poloxamer 188 and 2% w/v PLGA, could produce particle size of 114.6 nm, entrapment efficiency of 63.48% and drug release 80.23% at 12 h. A blank formulation with the same composition as optimized formulation without addition of poloxamer188 compared with optimized formulation, exhibited nanoparticles of larger mean particle size of 212.9 nm with entrapment efficiency of 68.47% and 50.5% drug release at 12 h. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis of the nanoformulations revealed that poloxamer188 greatly contributed to smooth, spherical morphology of nanosize polymeric nanoparticles. Further Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies on nanoformulation emphasized the significance of poloxamer188 in formulation and development of optimized MHc loaded PLGA nanosuspensions of second generation nanocrystals. In conclusion, the study emphasizes that poloxamer 188 was a versatile excipient, which played a pivotal role in producing nanosize carrier with high drug release profile of MHc loaded PLGA nanosuspensions of second generation nanocrystals.

References

[1]

V.B. Junyaprasert, B. Morakul, Nanocrystals for enhancement of oral bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015, 10(1): 13-23.

[2]

J.L. Italia, D.K. Bhatt, V. Bhardwaj, et al., PLGA nanoparticles for oral delivery of cyclosporine: Nephrotoxicity and pharmacokinetic studies in comparison to Sandimmune Neoral. Journal of Controlled Release, 2007, 119(2): 197-206.

[3]

C. Keck, S. Kobierski, R. Mauludin, et al., Second generation of drug nanocrystals for delivery of poorly soluble drugs: Smartcrystals technology. Dosis, 2008, 24(2): 124-128.

[4]

S.M. Pyo, M. Meinke, C.M. Keck, et al., Rutin-increased antioxidant and skin penetration by nanocrystal technology (smartcrystals). Cosmetics, 2016, 3(9): 1-10.

[5]

A. Tuomela, J. Saarinen, C.J. Strachan, et al., Production, applications and in vivo fate of drug nanocrystals. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2016, 34: 21-31.

[6]

A. Ramachandran, R.C. Ma, C. Snehalatha, et al., Diabetes in Asia. Lancet, 2010, 375(9712): 408-418.

[7]

J.C. Chan, V. Malik, W. Jia, et al., Diabetes in Asia: epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology. JAMA, 2009, 301(20): 2129-2140.

[8]

B. Lawrence, E.D. George, A. Serge, et al., Gastrointestinal tolerability of extended release metformin tablets compared to immediate–release metformin tablets: results of a retrospective cohort study. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2004, 20(4): 565-572.

[9]

C.R. Thomas, S.L. Turner, W.H. Jefferson, et al., Prevention of dexamethasone-induced insulin resistance by metformin. Biochem Pharmacol, 1998, 56(9): 1145-1150.

[10]

A. Johnson, S.R. Majumdar, S.H. Simpson, et al., Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin compared to sulfonylurea monotherapy in type-2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2002, 25: 2244-2248.

[11]

P.H. Marathe, Y. Wen, J. Norton, et al., Effect of altered gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility on metformin absorption. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2000, 50: 325-332.

[12]

A.N. Nagappa, Novel strategies for the therapeutic management of type Ⅱ diabetes. Health Administrator, 2008, 12: 58-68.

[13]

R.A. Emami, P. Fisel, A.T. Nies, et al., Metformin and cancer: From the old medicine cabinet to pharmacological pitfalls and prospects. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2013, 34(2): 126-135.

[14]

G. Corti, M. Cirri, F. Maestrelli, et al., Sustained-release matrix tablets of metformin hydrochloride in combination with triacetyl-β-cyclodextrin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2008, 68: 303-309.

[15]
S. Sweetman, The complete drug reference. Electronic version. Martindale Pharmaceutical Press, 2007.
[16]

A. Lee, J.E. Morley, Metformin decreases food consumption and induces weight loss in subjects with obesity with type Ⅱ non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Obes Res, 1998, 6: 47-53.

[17]

A.E. Riedmaier, P. Fisel, A.T. Nies, et al., Metformin and cancer: From the old medicine cabinet to pharmacological pitfalls and prospects. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2013, 34(2): 126-135.

[18]

O. Defang, N. Shufang, L. Wei, et al., In vitro and in vivo evaluation of two extended release preparations of combination metformin and glipizide. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 2005, 31: 677-685.

[19]

J.A. Johnson, S.R. Majumdr, S.H. Simpson, et al., Decreased mortality associated with the use of metformin compared to sulfonylurea monotherapy in type-2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2002, 25: 2244-2248.

[20]

D.H. Lian, L. Yang, T. Xing, et al., Preparation and in vitro in vivo evaluation of sustained-release metformin hydrochloride pellets. Eur J Pharm. Biopharm, 2006, 64: 185-192.

[21]

P. Nicklin, A.C. Keates, T. Page, et al., Transfer of metformin across monolayers of human intestinal Caco-2 cells and across rat intestine. Int J Pharm, 1996, 128: 155-162.

[22]

E. Lavik, R.H. Von, The role of nanomaterials in translational medicine. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 3419-3424.

[23]

E. Lepeltier, L. Nuhn, C.M. Lehr, et al., Not just for tumor targeting: unmetmedical needs and opportunities for nanomedicine. Nanomedicine, 2015, 10: 3147-3166.

[24]

J.D. Kingsley, H. Dou, J. Morehead, et al., Nanotechnology: a focus on nanoparticles as a drug delivery system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 2006, 1 (3): 340-350.

[25]

E.M. Pridgen, R. Langer, O.C. Farokhzad, et al., Biodegradable, polymeric nanoparticle delivery systems for cancer therapy. Nanomed, 2007, 2(5): 669-680.

[26]

K.S. Soppimath, T.M. Aminabhavi, A.R. Kulkarni, et al., Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. J Control Release, 2001, 70: 1-20.

[27]

M.L. Hans, A.M. Lowman, Biodegradable nanoparticles for drug delivery and targeting. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci, 2002, 6: 319-327.

[28]

H. Hillaireau, P Couvreur, Nanocarriers' entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery. Cell Mol Life Sci, 200, 66: 2873-2896.

[29]

D. Peer, J.M. Karp, S. Hong, et al., Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol, 2007, 2: 751-760.

[30]

R. Duncan, Polymer conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines. Nat Rev Cancer, 2006, 6: 688-701.

[31]

T. Sun, Y.S. Zhang, B. Pang, et al., Engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int. 53rd Ed., 2014: 12320-12364.

[32]

A. Kumari, S.K. Yadav, S.C. Yadav, et al., Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2010, 75: 1-18.

[33]

M. Vert, J. Mauduit, S. Li, et al., Biodegradation of PLA/GA polymers: Increasing complexity. Biomaterials, 1994, 15: 1209-1213.

[34]

A. Prokop, J. M Davidson, Nanovehicular intracellular delivery systems. J Pharm Sci, 2008, 97: 3518-3590.

[35]

S. Gelperina, K. Kisich, M.D. Iseman, et al., The potential advantages of nanoparticle drug delivery systems in chemotherapy of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005, 172: 1487-1490.

[36]

R.A. Jain, C.T. Rhodes, A.M. Railkar, et al., Controlled release of drugs from injectable in situ formed biodegradable PLGAmicrospheres: effect of various formulation variables. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2000, 50: 257-262.

[37]

S. Duvvuri, K.G. Janoria, A.K. Mitra, et al., Development of a novel formulation containing poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres dispersed in PLGA-PEG-PLGA gel for sustained delivery of ganciclovir. J Controlled Release, 2005, 108: 282-293.

[38]

J.K. Vasir, V. Labhasetwar, Biodegradable nanoparticles for cytosolic delivery of therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2007, 9: 718-728.

[39]

J.C. Neal, S. Stolnik, M.C. Garnett, et al., Modification of the copolymers poloxamer 407 and poloxamine 908 can affect the physical and biological properties of surface modified nanospheres. Pharm Res, 1998, 15(2): 318-324.

[40]

A.E. Hawley, L, Illum, S.S. Davis, et al., Lymph node localisation of biodegradable nanospheres surface modified with poloxamer and poloxamine block co-polymers. FEBS Lett, 1997, 400(3): 319-323.

[41]

S. Stolnik, S.E. Dunn, M.C. Garnett, et al., Surface modification of poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres by biodegradable poly(lactide)-poly(ethylene glycol) copolymers. Pharm Res, 1994, 11(12): 1800-1808.

[42]

S.Y. Lin, Y. Kawashima, The influence of three poly (-oxtethylene) poly (oxypropylene), surface-active block copolymers on the solubility behavior of indomethacin. Pharm Acta Helv, 1985, 60: 339-344.

[43]

U. Bilati, E. Allémann, E. Doelker, et al., Development of a nanoprecipitation method intended for the entrapment of hydrophilic drugs into nanoparticles. Eur J Pharm Sci, 2005, 24(1): 67-75.

[44]

H. Fessi, F. Puisieux, J.P. Devissaguet, et al., Nanocapsule formation by interfacial polymer deposition following solvent displacement. Int J Pharm, 1989, 55: R1-R4.

[45]

T. Govender, S. Stolnik, M.C. Garnett, et al., PLGA nanoparticles prepared by nanoprecipitation: Drug loading and release studies of a water soluble drug. J Control Release, 1999, 57(2): 171-185.

[46]

S. Doktorovova, E.B. Souto, Nanostructured lipid carrier-based hydrogel formulations for drug delivery: A comprehensive review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2009, 6: 165-176.

[47]

C. Vitorino, F.A. Carvalho, A.J. Almeida, et al., The size of solid lipid nanoparticles: an interpretation from experimental design. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2011, 84: 117-130.

[48]

A.B. Lokhande, S. Mishra, R.D. Kulkarni, et al., nfluence of different viscosity grade ethylcellulose polymers on encapsulation and in vitro release study of drug loaded nanoparticles. J Pharm Res, 2013, 7: 414-420.

[49]

B.P. Panda, C.S. Patro, D. Kesharwani, Optimization of diclofenac sodium orodispersible tablets with natural disintegrants using response surface Methodology. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech, 2013, 6: 2172-2180.

[50]

B.P. Panda, G. Jessica, Extraction and performance evaluation of Salvia Hispanica mucilage as natural disintegrants for optimization of pyrilaminemaleate fast dissolvingtablets. Nat Prod J, 2015, 5(4): 288-298.

[51]

C. Fonseca, S. Simões, R. Gaspar, et al., Paclitaxel-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: preparation, physicochemical characterization and in vitro anti-tumoral activity. J Control Release, 2002, 83(2): 273-286.

[52]

B.P. Panda, Impact of statistical central composite face centered design approach on method and process optimization of metformin hydrochloride loaded PLGA nanoformulation. Micro and Nanosystems, 2017, 9: 55-71.

Nano Biomedicine and Engineering
Pages 334-343
Cite this article:
Panda BP, Krishnamoorthy R, Shivashekaregowda NKH, et al. Influence of Poloxamer 188 on Design and Develop-ment of Second Generation PLGA Nanocrystals of Metformin Hydrochloride. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 2018, 10(4): 334-343. https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v10i4.p334-343

920

Views

123

Downloads

10

Crossref

9

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 05 July 2018
Accepted: 11 October 2018
Published: 29 October 2018
© Bibhu Prasad Panda, Rachna Krishnamoorthy, Naveen Kumar Hawala Shivashekaregowda, and Sujata Patnaik.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Return