AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Bioactivity Behaviour of Osteoblasts on Commercially Pure Titanium with TiO2-ZrO2 Nanocomposite Mixture Coating

Thekra Ismael Hamad1( )Rawaa Zaher Hassan Zwain2Ali Mohammad Ali Aljafery2
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq
Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Iraq
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study aims to improve the bioactivity response of osteoblasts attachment and proliferation on commercial pure titanium surface by the mixture of nanocomposite coating material of 70% TiO2 (rutile 10-30 nm, Sky Spring Nanomaterials, USA) and 30% ZrO2 (20-30 nm, Sky Spring Nanomaterials, USA). This may increase the likelihood of developing the modified implant surface by electrophoretic deposition and the dipping methods of nanocomposite mixture to enhance the surface bioactivity and promote bone formation. Three groups of commercially pure titanium: one uncoated group and two coated groups with nanocomposite mixture of different coating techniques; one group for electro photic deposition technique (EPD); and one group for dip technique. The bioactivity evaluation of cell cultures, isolation of osteoblast cells from calvaria and long limbs of 3-4 days neonatal rats to evaluate the attachment and the proliferation assay in 4 and 8 days of incubation periods for each group. However, osteoblast cells attachment and proliferation showed the least attached and proliferated cells in uncoated samples, while the EPD coated sample showed the highest.

References

[1]

I. Abrahamsson, G. Cardaropoli, Peri‐implant hard and soft tissue integration to dental implants made of titanium and gold. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2007, 18(3): 269-274.

[2]

M. Saini, Y. Singh, P. Arora, et al., Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Clinical Cases: WJCC, 2015, 3(1): 52.

[3]

F. Rupp, L. Liang, J. Geis-Gerstorfer, et al., Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. Dental Materials, 2018, 34(1): 40-57.

[4]

P. Mandracci, F. Mussano, P. Rivolo, et al., Surface treatments and functional coatings for biocompatibility improvement and bacterial adhesion reduction in dental implantology. Coatings, 2016, 6(1): 7.

[5]

R.Z.H. Zwain, T.I. Hamad, Coating evaluation of nanocomposite mixture of TiO2 and ZrO2 by electrophoretic deposition and dip techniques on commercially pure titanium. Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science, 2018, 6(2): 483.

[6]
Z.C. Wang, Y.J. Ni, and J.C. Huang, Fabrication and characterization of HAp/Al2O3 composite coating on titanium substrate. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. 2008: 1526-1530.
[7]

S. Anil, P.S. Anand, H. Alghamdi, et al., Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointegration. Implant dentistry-a rapidly evolving practice, 2011: 83-108.

[8]

J. Si, J. Zhang, S. Liu, et al., Characterization of a micro-roughened TiO2/ZrO2 coating: mechanical properties and HBMSC responses in vitro. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin, 2014, 46(7): 572-581.

[9]

S.E.B. Taylor, M. Shah, and I.R. Orriss, Generation of rodent and human osteoblasts. BoneKEy Reports, 2014, 3.

[10]

Z.G.M. Azzawi, T.I. Hamad, S.A. Kadhim, et al., Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2018, 29(7): 96.

[11]
J.P. Dillon, V.J. Waring-Green, A.M. Taylor, et al., Primary human osteoblast cultures. Bone research protocols. Humana Press, 2012: 3-18.
[12]

A.L. Rosa, M.M. Beloti, Effect of cpTi surface roughness on human bone marrow cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Brazilian Dental Journal, 2003, 14(1): 16-21.

[13]

C.A. Gregory, W.G. Gunn, A. Peister, et al., An Alizarin red-based assay of mineralization by adherent cells in culture: comparison with cetylpyridinium chloride extraction. Analytical Biochemistry, 2004, 329(1): 77-84.

[14]

M. Jäger, C. Zilkens, K. Zanger, et al., Significance of nano-and microtopography for cell-surface interactions in orthopaedic implants. BioMed Research International, 2007, 2007.

[15]
S. Basu, J. Wang, and A. Paul, Commentary 2 nanomaterials for bone repair. 2017.
[16]

T.J. Webster, C. Ergun, R.H. Doremus, et al., Increased osteoblast adhesion on titanium‐coated hydroxylapatite that forms CaTiO3. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2003, 67(3): 975-980.

[17]

J. Marchi, V. Ussui, C.S. Delfino, et al., Analysis in vitro of the cytotoxicity of potential implant materials. Ⅰ: Zirconia‐titania sintered ceramics. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2010, 94(2): 305-311.

Nano Biomedicine and Engineering
Pages 361-367
Cite this article:
Hamad TI, Zwain RZH, Aljafery AMA. Bioactivity Behaviour of Osteoblasts on Commercially Pure Titanium with TiO2-ZrO2 Nanocomposite Mixture Coating. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 2019, 11(4): 361-367. https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v11i4.p361-367

621

Views

26

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 01 August 2019
Accepted: 20 November 2019
Published: 20 November 2019
© Thekra Ismael Hamad, Rawaa Zaher Hassan Zwain, and Ali Mohammad Ali Aljafery.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Return