PDF (5.1 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Research Article | Open Access

Studying the Effect of Using Ultrasound Vibration on the Reproduction of Detail and Surface Hardness of Dental Stone Models

Ali M. Aljafery1Mohammed Alkafagy2Zena J. Wally1()Athraa Mohammed Dheyaa3Raja'a M. Almusawi1Julfikar Haider4
Department of Prosthodontic Faculty of Dentistry, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
College of Dentistry, the Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Alkafeel, Najaf, Iraq
Department of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

The accuracy of surface production details in the dental models determines the success of the dental prosthesis in clinical application.

Aim

This in vitro study aims to compare between dental stone models produced using two types of techniques for pouring the addition silicone impression.

Method

The control group was poured using the conventional vibration technique at a vibration frequency of 3000 cycles/min and the experimental group was poured by an ultrasound vibration technique at a frequency of 28 kHz in order to assess the difference in pouring techniques in terms of reproduction of details and surface hardness. A stainless steel die, prepared based on the ISO 6873, was employed to fabricate samples for evaluating the surface details. Fisher's exact test scoring scale was employed to qualititatively assess the reproduced surface details. Vickers hardness was measured to evaluate the surface hardness of cylindrical stone samples poured by the two different techniques.

Results

The results indicated that the reproduction of details of the stone samples poured by the ultrasound vibration technique were not significantly different (P > 0.05) in comparison with that poured by the conventional vibration technique. However, the surface hardness was significantly enhanced (P = 0.04) by the ultrasound vibration pouring technique.

Conclusion

Although the application of ultrasound vibration during dental cast fabrication did not provide any significant clinical advantages in terms of surface reproducibility, it could significantly improve the surface hardness compared with the traditional vibration technique.

References

[1]
K.J. Anusavice, C. Shen, H.R. Rawls. Phılıps' Science of Dental Materials, 2012.
[2]

B.J. Kenyon, M.S. Hagge, C. Leknius, et al. Dimensional accuracy of 7 Die materials. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2005, 14(1): 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2005.00007.x

[3]

J.M. Paquette, T. Taniguchi, S.N. White. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin Die material using two setting methods. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000, 83(3): 301–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70132-6

[4]

W.J. van der Meer, F.S. Andriessen, D. Wismeijer, et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 2012, 7(8): e43312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043312

[5]

S.S. Azer, R.E. Kerby, L.A. Knobloch. Effect of mixing methods on the physical properties of dental stones. Journal of Dentistry, 2008, 36(9): 736–744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.010

[6]

T.J. Lindquist, C.M. Stanford, E. Knox. Influence of surface hardener on gypsum abrasion resistance and water sorption. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2003, 90(5): 441–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00544-4

[7]

R.D. Guiraldo, A.F.F. Moreti, J. Martinelli, et al. Influence of alginate impression materials and storage time on surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models. Acta Odontol. Latinoam., 2015, 28(2): 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1852-48342015000200010

[8]
R. Sakaguchi, J. Powers. Craig's restorative dental materials, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2010-0-65754-3
[9]

G. Fernandez de Grado, L. Keller, Y. Idoux-Gillet, et al. Bone substitutes: A review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. Journal of Tissue Engineering, 2018, 9: 2041731418776819. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731418776819

[10]

J.H. Kim, Y.W. Im, S. Oh, et al. Characterization of an anti-foaming and fast-setting gypsum for dental stone. Dental Materials, 2019, 35(12): 1728–1739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.110

[11]

P.A. Pandey, D.A. Mehtra. Comparative study of Dimensional stability and accuracy of various elastomaric materials. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 2014, 13(3): 40–45. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-13354045

[12]

R.D. Patel, M.T. Kattadiyil, C.J. Goodacre, et al. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2010, 104(5): 325–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60149-7

[13]

P. Duke, B.K. Moore, S.P. Haug, et al. Study of the physical properties of type Ⅳ gypsum, resin-containing, and epoxy Die materials. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2000, 83(4): 466–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70043-6

[14]

P. Rajagopal, V. Chitre, M.A. Aras. A comparison of the accuracy of patterns processed from an inlay casting wax, an auto-polymerized resin and a light-cured resin pattern material. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 2012, 23(2): 152–156. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.100418

[15]
R.M. Al Musawi, A.Z. Al Taai, M.T. Al Khafagy. The Effect of using Iraqi Plaster with Type Ⅲ Dental Stone as Investing Materials on the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion in Acrylic Resin Complete Dentures (a comparative Study). Chemistry and Materials Research, 2015, 7(9): 49–53. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/CMR/article/view/25449
[16]

M.E. Park, S.Y. Shin. Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2018, 119(5): 861.e1–861.e7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.020

[17]

R. Prisco, G. Cozzolino, P. Vigolo. Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy Die material using different polymerization methods. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2009, 18(2): 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849x.2008.00399.x

[18]

N. Wongkornchaowalit, V. Lertchirakarn. Setting time and flowability of accelerated Portland cement mixed with polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Journal of Endodontics, 2011, 37(3): 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.039

[19]

L. Praça, F.C. Pekam, R.O. Rego, et al. Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions. Dental Materials, 2018, 34(11): e280–e288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.301

[20]

B.J. Choi, S. Yoon, Y.W. Im, et al. Uniaxial/biaxial flexure strengths and elastic properties of resin-composite block materials for CAD/CAM. Dental Materials, 2019, 35(2): 389–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.032

[21]

M.L.C. Aragón, L.F. Pontes, L.M. Bichara, et al. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: A systematic review. European Journal of Orthodontics, 2016, 38(4): 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjw033

[22]

B. Vandenberghe. The digital patient - Imaging science in dentistry. Journal of Dentistry, 2018, 74(S1): S21–S26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.019

[23]

M.A. Silva, R.P. Vitti, S. Consani, et al. Linear dimensional change, compressive strength and detail reproduction in type Ⅳ dental stone dried at room temperature and in a microwave oven. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 2012, 20(5): 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000500016

[24]

V. Narayanan, J. Padmanabhan, R. Chowdhary. In vitro comparison of dimensional stability of stone dies obtained from two elastomers after two treatments. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 2011, 1(3): 169–173. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10019-1031

[25]

G.R.R. Lillywhite, F. Vohra. Influence of polyurethane resin dies on the fit and adaptation of full veneer crowns. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 2015, 26(1): 72–76. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.156814

[26]
J. Ywom. Evaluation of accuracy of impression materials with different mixing techniques, 2013. https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/158/
[27]

C.P. Fernandes, N. Vassilakos. Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1993, 70(5): 457–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90085-3

[28]

S. Kreve. Analysis of linear dimensional change of different materials used for casting dental models: Plaster type 4, nanocomposites carbon nanostructures, polyurethane resin and epoxy resin. Journal of Dental Health, Oral Disorders & Therapy, 2018, 9(2): 200–205. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2018.09.00359

[29]

Z. Wu, X. Lu, X. Wang, et al. Overview of polymeric biomaterials for dental applications. Biomaterials and Materials for Medicine, 2021: 145–176. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003161981-5

[30]

Y.C. Chang, C.H. Yu, W.M. Liang, et al. Comparison of the surface roughness of gypsum models constructed using various impression materials and gypsum products. Journal of Dental Sciences, 2016, 11(1): 23–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.11.002

[31]

G.H. Johnson, X. Lepe, T.C. Aw. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2003, 90(4): 354–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00429-3

[32]
B. Darvell. Materials science for dentistry, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-05454-5
[33]

O.M. Aljubori, A.M.A. Aljafery, R.M. Al-Mussawi. Evaluation the linear dimensional changes and hardness of gypsum product/stone type Ⅳ after adding silica nanoparticles. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 2020, 12(3): 227–231. https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v12i3.p227-231

[34]

34. N. Ozyemisci, M. Yorulmaz. A new dental casting technique for production of void-free dental models. European Oral Research, 2020, 54(3): 119–122. https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200098

[35]

Y. Nagasawa, Y. Hibino, H. Shigeta, et al. Characteristics of a new dental stone mixed by shaking. Dental Materials Journal, 2020, 39(3): 355–366. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-427

[36]

N.K. Reddy, I. Aparna. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration and role of a surfactant on void formation in models poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 2011, 14(2): 151–155. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.82620

[37]

M.A. Abdullah. Effect of frequency and amplitude of vibration on void formation in dies poured from polyvinyl siloxane impressions. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1998, 80(4): 490–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70017-4

Nano Biomedicine and Engineering
Pages 263-271
Cite this article:
Aljafery AM, Alkafagy M, Wally ZJ, et al. Studying the Effect of Using Ultrasound Vibration on the Reproduction of Detail and Surface Hardness of Dental Stone Models. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 2022, 14(3): 263-271. https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v14i3.p263-271
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return