AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

GO-Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Composite for Selective Targeting of Cancer Cells

Venkatesha Narayanaswamy1( )Yasrib Qurishi2Chandan Srivastava1
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Department of Molecular Reproduction, Development and Genetics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) based nanocomposites have attracted lot of attention in the biomedical field, especially for the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. Using invitro studies, recent reports have illustrated the ability of graphene oxide for selective killing of several cancer cell lines. Coupling of the anticancer property of graphene oxide with magnetic nanoparticles makes the graphene oxide-nanoparticle composite a potential material for diagnosis and treatment of cancer. In this work, GO-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite was synthesized by the co-precipitation method. The GO-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite was thoroughly analyzed for their potential towards killing of cancer cell lines by various assays like MTT, cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry, flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis and necrosis, apoptotic characterization of HL-60 cells using fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometric measurement of intracellular peroxides (ROS). All these biological end-points indicated cell death by apoptosis. Here, we report that GO-Fe3O4 composites interact with HeLa and cause dose dependent cytotoxicity which robustly induced cell cycle arrest, annexin V-FITC staining and reactive oxygen species generation.

References

[1]

Y. Yang, A.M. Asiri, Z. Tang, et al., Graphene based materials for biomedical applications. Mater. Today, 2013, 16(10): 365-373.

[2]

S. Goenka, V. Sant, and S. Sant, Graphene-based nanomaterials for drug delivery and tissue engineering. J. Controlled Release, 2014, 173: 75-88.

[3]

M. Orecchioni, R. Cabizza, A. Bianco, et al., Graphene as cancer theranostic tool: Progress and future challenges. Theranostics, 2015, 5(7): 710.

[4]

L. Feng, Z. Liu, Graphene in biomedicine: opportunities and challenges. Nanomed., 2011, 6(2): 317-324.

[5]

H. Bao, Y. Pan, Y. Ping, et al., Chitosan-functionalized graphene oxide as a nanocarrier for drug and gene delivery. Small, 2011, 7(11): 1569-1578.

[6]

X. Sun, Z. Liu, K. Welsher, et al., Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res., 2008, 1(3): 203-212.

[7]

L.Yang, Y.T.G. Tseng, et al., Photothermal therapeutic response of cancer cells to aptamer-gold nanoparticle-hybridized graphene oxide under NIR illumination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces., 2015, 7(9): 5097-5106.

[8]

R.C. Huang, W.J. Chiu, L.I. Po-Jung, et al., Multivalent aptamer/gold nanoparticle-modified graphene oxide for mass spectrometry-based tumor tissue imaging. Sci. Rep., 2015, 5: 10292.

[9]

M. Fiorillo, A.F. Verre, M. Iliut, et al., Graphene oxide selectively targets cancer stem cells, across multiple tumor types: Implications for non- toxic cancer treatment, via "differentiation-based nano-therapy." Oncotarget, 2015, 6(6): 3553-3562.

[10]

N. Venkatesha, P. Poojar, Y. Qurishi, et al., Graphene oxide-Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite with high transverse proton relaxivity value for magnetic resonance imaging. J. Appl. Phys., 2015, 117(15): 154702.

[11]

D.C. Marcano, D.V. Kosynkin, J.M. Berlin, et al., Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano., 2010, 4(8): 4806-4814.

[12]

J.C. Stockert, A.B.Castro, M. Canete, et al., MTT assay for cell viability: Intracellular localization of the formazan product is in lipid droplets. Acta Histochem., 2012, 114(8): 785-796.

[13]

P. Pozarowski, Z. Darzynkiewicz, Analysis of cell cycle by flow cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ., 2004, 281: 301-311.

[14]

A.L. Bertho, M.A. Santiago, and S.G. Coutinho, Flow cytometry in the study of cell death. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz., 2000, 95(3): 429-433.

[15]

M. Hristov, W. Erl, S. Linder, et al., Apoptotic bodies from endothelial cells enhance the number and initiate the differentiation of human endothelial progenitor cells in vitro. Blood, 2004, 104(9): 2761-2766.

[16]

E. Eruslanov, S. Kusmartsev, Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol., 2010, 594: 57-72.

[17]

P. Granitzer, K. Rumpf, M. Venkatesan, et al., Magnetic study of Fe3O4 nanoparticles incorporated within mesoporous silicon. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2010, 157(7): K145-K151.

[18]

A.L. Patterson, The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys. Rev., 1939, 56(10): 978.

[19]

D. Yang, A. Velamakanni, G. Bozoklu, et al., Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and Micro-Raman spectroscopy. Carbon, 2009, 47(1): 145-152.

Nano Biomedicine and Engineering
Pages 96-102
Cite this article:
Narayanaswamy V, Qurishi Y, Srivastava C. GO-Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Composite for Selective Targeting of Cancer Cells. Nano Biomedicine and Engineering, 2017, 9(1): 96-102. https://doi.org/10.5101/nbe.v9i1.p96-102

409

Views

13

Downloads

11

Crossref

11

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 06 March 2017
Accepted: 30 March 2017
Published: 31 March 2017
© 2017 Venkatesha Narayanaswamy, Yasrib Qurishi, and Chandan Srivastava.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Return