AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (10.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access | Online First

A novel aeroengine remaining useful life prediction method considering degradation starting point

Shiwei SUOYue WANG,( )Lin LINSong FUYifan LU( )
School of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of JAMST

Show Author Information

Abstract

The degradation of aeroengines can be divided into two stages: the healthy stage and the unhealthy stage. Remain useful life (RUL) prediction should be triggered from the start time of the unhealthy stage to ensure safe operation. Nevertheless, many existing RUL prediction methods simply assign a fixed DSP to any aeroengine, limiting further improvement as the DSP is uncertain and varies with individual differences of aeroengines. To address this issue, a novel two-stage deep residual long-short term memory (Dual-DRLSTM) is developed, which integrates DSP detection and RUL prediction into one framework, and associates them through degradation health index (HI). First, DRLSTM is employed as the backbone to extract representative degradation features from multi-dimensional time-series monitoring data. Second, the Dual-DRLSTM relaxes the strong assumption of the fixed degradation start point (DSP) and performs DSP detection for each aeroengine. Then, the Dual-DRLSTM predicts the RUL of the aeroengine beyond the DSP in the unhealthy stage. Finally, the outstanding performance of Dual-DRLSTM is validated through a series of experiments on a public C-MAPSS dataset.

References

1

Dong M, He D. Hidden semi-Markov model-based methodology for multi-sensor equipment health diagnosis and prognosis. Eur J Oper Res 2007;178(3):858-878.

2

Wei Y, Wu D, Terpenny J. Robust incipient fault detection of complex systems using data fusion. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2020; 69(12): 9526-9534.

3

Hanachi H, Liu J, Banerjee A, et al. A physics-based modeling approach for performance monitoring in gas turbine engines. IEEE Trans Reliab 2015;64(1):197-205.

4

Hassani SMMN, Jin X, Ni J. Physics-based Gaussian process for the health monitoring for a rolling. Acta Astronaut 2019;154:133-139.

5

Zhu J, Chen N, Shen CJMS, et al. A new data-driven transferable remaining useful life prediction approach for bearing under different working conditions. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2020;139:106602.

6

Yang B, Liu R, Zio EJIToIE. Remaining useful life prediction based on a double-convolutional neural network architecture. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2019;66(12):9521-9530.

7

Bektas O, Jones JA, Sankararaman S, et al. A neural network filtering approach for similarity-based remaining useful life estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;101(1-4):87-103.

8

Zhang J, Wang P, Yan R, et al. Long short-term memory for machine remaining life prediction. J Manuf Syst 2018;48:78-86.

9

Guo L, Li N, Jia F, et al. A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing 2017;240:98-109.

10

Liu J, Lei F, Pan C, et al. Prediction of remaining useful life of multistage aero-engine based on clustering and LSTM fusion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021;214:107807.

11

Liu L, Song X, Zhou Z. Aircraft engine remaining useful life estimation via a double attention-based data-driven architecture. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022;221:108330.

12

Zhou L, Wang H, Xu S. Aero-engine prognosis strategy based on multiscale feature fusion and multi-task parallel learning. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2023;234:109182.

13

Zhang Z, Song W, Li Q. Dual-aspect self-attention based on transformer for remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 2022; 71:1-11.

14
Yu J, Peng Y, Deng Q. Remaining useful life prediction based on multiscale residual convolutional network for aero-engine. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM); 2021. p. 1-6.
15

Xia J, Feng Y, Lu C, et al. LSTM-based multi-layer self-attention method for remaining useful life estimation of mechanical systems. Eng Fail Anal 2021;125:105385.

16

Fu S, Zhong S, Lin L, et al. A novel time-series memory auto-encoder with sequentially updated reconstructions for remaining useful life prediction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2022;33(12):7114-7125.

17

Miao H, Li B, Sun C, et al. Joint learning of degradation assessment and RUL prediction for aeroengines via dual-task deep LSTM networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 2019;15(9):5023-5032.

18
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); 2016. p. 770-778.
19
Pedamonti D. Comparison of non-linear activation functions for deep neural networks on MNIST classification task. Arxiv. 2018.
20

Lei Y, Li N, Guo L, et al. Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2018;104:799-834.

21

Fan Y, Nowaczyk S, Rognvaldsson T. Transfer learning for remaining useful life prediction based on consensus self-organizing models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2020;203:107098.

22
Dong X-L, Gu C-K, Wang Z-O. Research on shape-based time series similarity measure. 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics; 2006. p. 1253-1258.
23
Saxena A, Goebel K, Simon D, et al. Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management; 2008. p. 1-9.
24

Li X, Ding Q, Sun J-Q. Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2018; 172:1-11.

25

Wu Y, Yuan M, Dong S, et al. Remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems using vanilla LSTM neural networks. Neurocomputing 2018;275:167-179.

26

Sander J, Ester M, Kriegel HP, et al. Density-ased clustering in spatial databases: The algorithm GDBSCAN and its applications. Data Min Knowl Discov 1998;2(2):169-194.

27

Zhang C, Lim P, Qin AK, et al. Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2016;28(10):2306-2318.

28

Yu W, Kim IY, Mechefske C. Remaining useful life estimation using a bidirectional recurrent neural network based autoencoder scheme. Mech Syst Signal Proc 2019;129:764-780.

29

Syarif I, Prugel-Bennett A, Wills GJT. SVM parameter optimization using grid search and genetic algorithm to improve classification performance. Telkomnika 2016;14(4):1502-1509.

Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology
Article number: 2025002
Cite this article:
SUO S, WANG Y, LIN L, et al. A novel aeroengine remaining useful life prediction method considering degradation starting point. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2024, https://doi.org/10.51393/j.jamst.2025002

163

Views

2

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 01 April 2024
Revised: 16 April 2024
Accepted: 20 May 2024
Published: 03 June 2024
© 2025 JAMST

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return