AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (13.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access | Online First

Application of audible sound signals in tool wear monitoring: a review

Guochao LIaXinhang SHANGaLi SUNa( )Bofeng FUbLei YANGaHonggen ZHOUa
School of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212000, China
Shaanxi Diesel Engine Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Xingping 713100, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of JAMST

Show Author Information

Abstract

Tool wear condition monitoring (TWCM) has been a research hotspot for decades because of its significance for intelligent manufacturing. However, it has been little applicated in practice despites of its large number of publications. One of the crucial reasons is that the employed monitoring sensors, such as force, vibration, temperature and acoustic emission would disturb the nature processing conditions, which limited their applications in practice. The microphone sensor, which collect audible sound (AS) signal, is considered to be a prospective strategy for TWCM, because it has the advantages of closely related to tool wear, no need to attach sensors, convenient installation, flexible measurement, and no effect on the nature processing conditions. However, tool wear condition monitoring based on audible sound signal (TWCM-AS) is hindered by its insufficient accuracy. Therefore, this study serves as a resource for researchers and manufacturers by providing the recent trends in TWCM-AS. The generation mechanism of cutting AS through physical properties and practical experiments were concluded. Four key technologies, including acquisition, denoising, feature extraction and decision-making algorithm were discussed in detail. And future researches were point out, such as datasets, initiative denoising system, feature extraction of AS and interpretable decisionmaking algorithm.

References

1

Vetrichelvan G, Sundaram S, Kumaran SS, et al. An investigation of tool wear using acoustic emission and genetic algorithm. Journal of Vibration and Control 2015;21(15): 3061-3066.

2

Takeyama H, DoiY, Mitsuoka T, et al. Sensors of tool life for optimization of machining. Bulletin of JSME 1969; 12(49):132-140.

3

Tang L, Tian H, Huang H, et al. A survey of mechanical fault diagnosis based on audio signal analysis. Measurement 2023;220: 113294.

4

Navarro-Devia JH, Chen Y, Dao DV, et al. Chatter detection in milling processes—a review on signal processing and condition classification. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2023; 125(9-10):3943-3980.

5

Wei W, Shang Y, Peng Y, et al. Research progress of noise in highspeed cutting machining. Sensors (Basel) 2022;22(10):3851.

6

Coady J, Toal D, Newe T, et al. Remote acoustic analysis for tool condition monitoring. Procedia Manufacturing 2019; 38:840-847.

7

Weller EJ, Schrier HM, Weichbrodt B. What sound can be expected from a worn tool? Journal of Engineering for Industry 1969;91(3):525-534.

8

Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Inasaki I, et al. Tool Condition Monitoring (TCM) — The status of research and industrial application. CIRP Annals 1995;44(2):541-567.

9

Cheng Y, Guan R, Jin Y, et al. Research on intelligent tool condition monitoring based on data-driven: a review. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2023;37(7):3721-3738.

10

Cheng Y, Gai X, Guan R, et al. Tool wear intelligent monitoring techniques in cutting: a review. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 2023;37(1):289-303.

11

Li X, Liu X, Yue C, et al. Systematic review on tool breakage monitoring techniques in machining operations. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2022; 176:103882.

12

Sun W, Zhang D, Luo M. Machining process monitoring and application: a review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology 2021;1(2):2021001.

13

Zhou Y, Liu C, Yu X, et al. Tool wear mechanism, monitoring and remaining useful life (RUL) technology based on big data: a review. SN Applied Sciences 2022;4(8):1-24.

14

Mohanraj T, Shankar S, Rajasekar R, et al. Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling process—a review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 2020;9(1):1032-1042.

15

Swain S, Panigrahi I, Sahoo AK, et al. Adaptive tool condition monitoring system: A brief review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2020; 23:474-478.

16

Goyal D, Pabla BS. Condition based maintenance of machine tools—A review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2015; 10:24-35.

17

Ambhore N, Kamble D, Chinchanikar S, et al. Tool condition monitoring system: A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 2015; 2(4-5):3419-3428.

18

Siddhpura A, Paurobally R. A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013;65(1-4):371-393.

19

Dutta S, Pal SK, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Application of digital image processing in tool condition monitoring: A review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2013; 6(3):212-232.

20

Li B. A review of tool wear estimation using theoretical analysis and numerical simulation technologies. International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 2012;35:143-151.

21

Liang SY, Hecker RL, Landers RG. Machining process monitoring and control: The state-of-the-art. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 2004;126(2):297-310.

22

Leem CS, Dornfeld DA. Design and implementation of sensor-based tool-wear monitoring systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 1996;10(4):439-458.

23

Wang W, Liu W, Zhang Y, et al. Precise measurement of geometric and physical quantities in cutting tools inspection and condition monitoring: A review. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 2024; 37(4):23-53.

24

Pimenov DY, Kumar Gupta M, Da Silva LRR, et al. Application of measurement systems in tool condition monitoring of Milling: A review of measurement science approach. Measurement : Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 2022;199:111503.

25

Kishawy HA, Hegab H, Umer U, et al. Application of acoustic emissions in machining processes: analysis and critical review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018;98(5-8):1391-1407.

26

Dimla DE. Sensor signals for tool-wear monitoring in metal cutting operations—a review of methods. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 2000;40(8):1073-1098.

27

Yan R, Shang Z, Xu H, et al. Wavelet transform for rotary machine fault diagnosis:10 years revisited. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2023;200:110545.

28

Zhu K, San WY, Soon HG. Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: A review and some new results. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 2009;49(7-8):537-553.

29

Pimenov DY, Bustillo A, Wojciechowski S, et al. Artificial intelligence systems for tool condition monitoring in machining: analysis and critical review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2023; 34(5): 2079-2121.

30

Nasir V, Sassani F. A review on deep learning in machining and tool monitoring: methods, opportunities, and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2021;115(9-10):2683-2709.

31

Serin G, Sener B, Ozbayoglu AM, et al. Review of tool condition monitoring in machining and opportunities for deep learning. International journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2020; 109(3-4): 953-974.

32

Wong SY, Chuah JH, Yap HJ. Technical data-driven tool condition monitoring challenges for CNC milling: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2020; 107(11-12):4837-4857.

33

Vicente Abellan-Nebot J, Romero Subiron F. A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2010; 47 (1-4SI):237-257.

34

Kuntoğlu M, Aslan A, Pimenov DY, et al. A review of indirect tool condition monitoring systems and decision-making methods in turning:Critical analysis and trends. Sensors 2021;21(1):108.

35

Sick B. On-line and indirect tool wear monitoring in turning with artificial neural networks: a review of more than a decade of research. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2002;16(4):487-546.

36

Henriquez P, Alonso JB, Ferrer MA, et al. Review of automatic fault diagnosis systems using audio and vibration signals. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 2014;44(5):642-652.

37

Rech J, Dumont F, Le Bot A, et al. Reduction of noise during milling operations. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 2017; 18: 39-44.

38

Sampath K, Kapoor SG, Devor RE. Modeling and prediction of cutting noise in the face-milling process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 2007;129(3):527-530.

39

Ji C, Liu Z. Numerical analysis of aeroacoustic noise for high-speed face milling cutters in three dimensional unsteady flow fields. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 2012;134(4):041002.

40

Hu Y, Li S, Li S, et al. Research on the combined prediction model of milling sound pressure level based on force-thermal-vibration multifeature fusion. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2021;115(1-2):233-245.

41

Nourizadeh R, Rezaei SM, Zareinejad M, et al. Comprehensive investigation on sound generation mechanisms during machining for monitoring purpose. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2022;121(3-4): 1589-1610.

42

Wegener K, Bleicher F, Heisel U, et al. Noise and vibrations in machine tools. CIRP Annals 2021;70(2):611-633.

43
Ünal P, Deveci BU, Özbayoğlu AM. A review: Sensors used in tool wear monitoring and prediction. Mobile Web and Intelligent Information Systems MobiWIS 2022. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022; 13475:193-205.
44

Seemuang N, Mcleay T, Slatter T. Using spindle noise to monitor tool wear in a turning process. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2016;86(9-12):2781-2790.

45

Liu M, Tseng Y, Tran M. Tool wear monitoring and prediction based on sound signal. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2019;103(9-12):3361-3373.

46

Charoenprasit S, Seemuang N, Slatter T. Monitoring tool wear in drilling process using spindle noise features. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research 2018;7(5):564-568.

47

Gomes MC, Brito LC, Bacci Da Silva M, et al. Tool wear monitoring in micromilling using Support Vector Machine with vibration and sound sensors. Precision Engineering 2021;67: 137-151.

48

Cao H, Yue Y, Chen X, et al. Chatter detection in milling process based on synchro squeezing transform of sound signals. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2017; 89(9-12): 2747-2755.

49

Zhou C, Guo K, Sun J. Sound singularity analysis for milling tool condition monitoring towards sustainable manufacturing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2021;157:107738.

50

Yan S, Sui L, Wang S, et al. On-line tool wear monitoring under variable milling conditions based on a condition-adaptive hidden semiMarkov model (CAHSMM). Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2023;200: 110644.

51

Madhusudana CK, Kumar H, Narendranath S. Face milling tool condition monitoring using sound signal. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 2017; 8(S2):1643-1653.

52

Ding S, Zhang S, Yang C. Machine tool fault classification diagnosis based on audio parameters. Results in Engineering 2023;19:101308.

53

Kothuru A, Nooka SP, Liu R. Audio-based tool condition monitoring in milling of the workpiece material with the hardness variation using support vector machines and convolutional neural networks. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 2018;140(11):111006.

54

Li Z, Liu R, Wu D. Data-driven smart manufacturing: Tool wear monitoring with audio signals and machine learning. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2019;48:66-76.

55

Li Z, Liu X, Incecik A, et al. A novel ensemble deep learning model for cutting tool wear monitoring using audio sensors. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2022;79:233-249.

56

Sio-Sever A, Lopez JM, Asensio-Rivera C, et al. Improved estimation of end-milling parameters from acoustic emission signals using a microphone array assisted by AI modelling. Sensors (Basel) 2022;22(10):3807.

57

Zhang K, Yuan H, Nie P. A method for tool condition monitoring based on sensor fusion. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2015; 26(5):1011-1026.

58
Prakash K, Samraj A. Tool flank wears estimation by simplified SVD on emitted sound signals. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS). 2017. p. 1-5.
59

Raja JE, Kiong LC, Soong LW. Hilbert–Huang transform-based emitted sound signal analysis for tool flank wear monitoring. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2013;38(8): 2219-2226.

60

Nasir V, Dibaji S, Alaswad K, et al. Tool wear monitoring by ensemble learning and sensor fusion using power, sound, vibration, and AE signals. Manufacturing Letters 2021;30:32-38.

61
Anderson DA, Dias WA. Method for monitoring cutting tool wear during a machining operation. U.S. Patent No. 4744242. 17 May 1988.
62

Zafar T, Kamal K, Mathavan S, et al. A hybrid approach for noise reduction in acoustic signal of machining process using neural networks and ARMA model. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21(23):8023.

63

Ubhayaratne I, Pereira MP, Xiang Y, et al. Audio signal analysis for tool wear monitoring in sheet metal stamping. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2017;85:809-826.

64

Huang C, Lu M. Study of microphone array for noise reduction in sound based micro-tool wear monitoring. International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference 2011; 44311: 235-242.

65

Shaffer D, Ragai I, Danesh-Yazdi A, et al. Investigation of the feasibility of using microphone arrays in monitoring machining conditions. Manufacturing Letters 2018;15:132-134.

66

Cooper C, Zhang J, Gao RX, et al. Anomaly detection in milling tools using acoustic signals and generative adversarial networks. Procedia Manufacturing 2020; 48: 372-378.

67

Ferguson M, Bhinge R, Park J, et al. A data processing pipeline for prediction of milling machine tool condition from raw sensor data. Smart Sustain Manuf Syst 2018; 2(1).

68

Zhou Y, Sun B, Sun W, et al. Tool wear condition monitoring based on a two-layer angle kernel extreme learning machine using sound sensor for milling process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2022;33(1):247-258.

69

Song K, Kim G, Yun H, et al. Machining sound analysis for the effects of fiber bending on cutting mechanisms during carbon fiber reinforced plastic composite milling. Composites Part B: Engineering 2022;241:110019.

70

Xia G, Jiang Z, Zhang J, et al. Sound pressure signal-based bone cutting depth control in robotic vertebral lamina milling. IEEE Sensors Journal 2022; 22(11):10708-10718.

71

Bai H, Wang R, Wang Q, et al. Motor bur milling state identification via fast fourier transform analyzing sound signal in cervical spine posterior decompression surgery. Orthop Surg 2021;13(8):2382-2395.

72

Schmitz TL, Medicus K, Dutterer B. Exploring once-per-revolution audio signal variance as a chatter indicator. Machining Science and Technology 2002;6(2):215-233.

73

Ying Z, Shu L, Sugita N. Bone milling: On monitoring cutting state and force using sound signals. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2022;35(1):12-61.

74
Rafezi H, Akbari J, Behzad M. Tool condition monitoring based on sound and vibration analysis and wavelet packet decomposition. In: 2012 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Mechatronics and its Applications. 2012. p.1-4.
75

Cooper C, Wang P, Zhang J, et al. Convolutional neural network-based tool condition monitoring in vertical milling operations using acoustic signals. Procedia Manufacturing 2020;49:105-111.

76

Ai CS, Sun YJ, He GW, et al. The milling tool wear monitoring using the acoustic spectrum. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2012;61(5-8):457-463.

77

Liu TH, Chi JZ, Wu BL, et al. Design and implementation of machine tool life inspection system based on sound sensing. Sensors (Basel) 2022;23(1):284.

78

Mühlbauer M, Würschinger H, Polzer D, et al. Automated data labeling and anomaly detection using airborne sound analysis. Procedia CIRP 2020;93:1247-1252.

79

Salgado DR, Alonso FJ. An approach based on current and sound signals for in-process tool wear monitoring. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2007;47(14): 2140-2152.

80

Nasir V, Cool J, Sassani F. Intelligent machining monitoring using sound signal processed with the wavelet method and a self-organizing neural network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2019; 4(4):3449-3456.

81

Perumal CL, Bhadrinathan SB, Samraj A. Tool wear condition monitoring using emitted sound signals by simple machine learning technique. Design, Construction, Maintenance 2022;2:168-172.

82

Thangamuthu M, Tamilvanan A. Decision support system for tool condition monitoring in milling process using artificial neural network. Journal of Engineering Research 2022;10(4B):142-155.

83

Liang W, Tong H, Li B, et al. Feasibility research on break-out detection using audio signal in drilling film cooling holes by EDM. Procedia CIRP 2020;95:566-571.

84

Rubio EM, Teti R. Cutting parameters analysis for the development of a milling process monitoring system based on audible energy sound. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 2009;20(1): 43-54.

85

Ghosh N, Ravi YB, Patra A, et al. Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2007;21(1):466-479.

86

Zhang X, Chen H, Xu J, et al. A novel sound-based belt condition monitoring method for robotic grinding using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2018; 260:9-19.

87

Kothuru A, Nooka SP, Liu R. Application of audible sound signals for tool wear monitoring using machine learning techniques in end milling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2018;95(9-12):3797-3808.

88

Zhang Z, Wen G, Chen S. Audible sound-based intelligent evaluation for aluminum alloy in robotic pulsed GTAW: Mechanism, feature selection, and defect detection. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 2018;14(7): 2973-2983.

89

Lu M, Wan B. Study of high-frequency sound signals for tool wear monitoring in micromilling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2013;66:1785-1792.

90

Wei W, Shang Y, Peng Y, et al. Prediction model of sound signal in high-speed milling of wood-plastic composites. Materials (Basel) 2022;15(11):3838.

91

Han S, Mannan N, Stein DC, et al. Classification and regression models of audio and vibration signals for machine state monitoring in precision machining systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2021;61:45-53.

92

Peng C Y, Raihany U, Kuo S W, et al. Sound Detection monitoring tool in CNC milling sounds by K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21(13):4288.

93

Cheng C, Li J, Liu Y, et al. An online belt wear monitoring method for abrasive belt grinding under varying grinding parameters. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2020;50:80-89.

94

Ravikumar S, Ramachandran KI. Tool wear monitoring of multipoint cutting tool using sound signal features signals with machine learning techniques. Materials Today: Proceedings 2018;5(11):25720-25729.

95

Kim J, Lee H, Jeong S, et al. Sound-based remote real-time multi-device operational monitoring system using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2021;58:431-441.

96

Lee C, Jwo J, Hsieh H, et al. An intelligent system for grinding wheel condition monitoring based on machining sound and deep learning. IEEE Access 2020;8:58279-58289.

97

Ntalampiras S. One-shot learning for acoustic diagnosis of industrial machines. Expert Systems with Applications 2021;178:114984.

98
Müller R, Ritz F, Illium S, et al. Acoustic Anomaly Detection for Machine Sounds based on Image Transfer Learning. Arxiv 2020. arxiv preprint arxiv:2006.03429, 2020.
99

Cheng C, Li J, Liu Y, et al. Deep convolutional neural network-based in-process tool condition monitoring in abrasive belt grinding. Computers in Industry 2019;106:1-13.

100
The prognostics and health management society. 2010 Conference Data Challenge[Internet]. Available from: https://www.phmsociety.org/competition/phm/10.
101
Agogino A, Goebel K. BEST Lab, UC Berkeley.“Milling Data Set’’, NASA Prognostics Data Repository, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA. Available from: https://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prognostic-data-repository
102
Li YG Liu CQ Li DH et al. Tool wear dataset of NUAA_Ideahouse[Internet]. IEEE Dataport; 2021. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/3aa1-5e83.
103
Purohit H, Tanabe R, Ichige T, et al. MIMII Dataset: Sound Dataset for Malfunctioning Industrial Machine Investigation and Inspection. arxiv 2019. arxiv preprint arxiv:1909.09347.
104
Harada N, Niizumi D, Takeuchi D, et al. ToyADMOS2: Another dataset of miniature-machine operating sounds for anomalous sound detection under domain shift conditions. arxiv 2021. arxiv preprint arxiv: 2106.02369.
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology
Article number: 2025003
Cite this article:
LI G, SHANG X, SUN L, et al. Application of audible sound signals in tool wear monitoring: a review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2024, https://doi.org/10.51393/j.jamst.2025003

359

Views

44

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 07 May 2024
Revised: 20 May 2024
Accepted: 17 June 2024
Published: 12 July 2024
© 2025 JAMST

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return