AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (13.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access | Online First

Fracture prediction using damage models for incremental sheet forming process: A brief review

Kai ZHANGa( )Yuqing HUaMingchuan WANGbZhenming YUEcBing LIUaChunjian SUa( )
College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
Sino-French Engineer School, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong University at Weihai, Weihai 264209, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF) technology is a flexible and promising manufacturing technology to manufacture desired shape of sheet metals without using specific dies. The sheet subjected to incremental forming undergoes continuous deformation and frequently fails by fracture. In order to improve the formability, simulation of the ISF process until rupture of the sheet is essential. This paper provides a brief review on fracture prediction of incremental forming process based on uncoupled and coupled damage models, the predictive capability the of damage models in ISF process is compared via forming depth, final shape and crack paths. In addition, the theoretical aspects of various damage models are given in details, the merits and drawbacks of the damage models are carefully discussed. Finally, the paper offers insights into achieving high-quality, defect-free parts using incremental forming technology and highlights future trend in simulation of facture in ISF process.

References

1

Bai D, Gao P, Yan X, et al. Intelligent forming technology: State-ofthe-art review and perspectives. J Adv Manuf Sci Tech 2021; 1(3): 2021008.

2

Zheng J, Li Z, Shu X, et al. Tube spinning process: Recent advances and challenges. J Adv Manuf Sci Tech 2024; 4(4): 2024014.

3

Emmens WC, Sebastiani G, van den Boogaard A H. The technology of Incremental Sheet Forming—A brief review of the history. J Mater Process Technol 2010; 210(8): 981-997.

4

Duflou JR, Habraken A-M, Cao J, et al. Single point incremental forming: state-of-the-art and prospects. Int J Mater Form 2018; 11(6): 743-773.

5

Guzmán CF, Yuan S, Duchêne L, et al. Damage prediction in single point incremental forming using an extended Gurson model. Int J Solids Struct 2018; 151: 45-56.

6

Gupta P, Szekeres A, Jeswiet J. Design and development of an aerospace component with single-point incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2019; 103(9-12): 3683-3702.

7

Su C, Lv S, Wang R, et al. Effects of forming parameters on the forming limit of single-point incremental forming of sheet metal. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2021; 113(1-2): 483-501.

8

Su C, Zhao Z, Lv Y, et al. Effect of process parameters on plastic formability and microstructures of magnesium alloy in single point incremental forming. J Mater Eng Perform 2019; 28(12): 7737-7755.

9

Yoganjaneyulu G, Sathiya Narayanan C, Narayaasamy R. Investigation on the fracture behavior of titanium grade 2 sheets by using the single point incremental forming process. J Manuf Process 2018; 35: 197-204.

10

Li Z, Lu S, Zhang T, et al. Numerical prediction of ductile fracture in multi-stage single point incremental forming based on phenomenological modified Mohr–Coulomb. Measurement 2020; 154.

11

Bailly DBM, Hirt G, Pofahl T, et al. Analysis into differences between the buckling in single-point and two-point incremental sheet forming of components for self-supporting sheet metal structures. Key Eng Mater 2014; 622: 367-374.

12

Wu R, Liu X, Li M, et al. Investigations on deformation mechanism of double-sided incremental sheet forming with synchronous thermomechanical steel-aluminum alloy bonding. J Mater Process Technol 2021; 294.

13

Ao D, Gao J, Chu X, et al. Formability and deformation mechanism of Ti-6Al-4V sheet under electropulsing assisted incremental forming. Int J Solids Struct 2020; 202: 357-367.

14

Zhang H, Chu X, Bao W, et al. Microstructure evolution of AZ31B sheet deformed by electric hot temperature-controlled single point incremental forming. Mater Sci Eng: A 2021; 823.

15

Yang DY, Bambach M, Cao J, et al. Flexibility in metal forming. CIRP Annals 2018; 67(2): 743-765.

16

Cao TS. Numerical simulation of 3D ductile cracks formation using recent improved Lode-dependent plasticity and damage models combined with remeshing. Int J Solids Struct 2014; 51(13): 2370-2381.

17

Ghorbel O, Mars J, Koubaa S, et al. Coupled anisotropic plasticity-ductile damage: Modeling, experimental verification, and application to sheet metal forming simulation. Int J Mech Sci 2019; 150: 548-560.

18

Niu Y, Wang Y, Shi Y. Effect of micro-alloying of Ca and Gd on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-Zn-Al alloy. J Adv Manuf Sci Tech 2023; 3(2): 2023003.

19

Bonora N, Gentile D, Pirondi A, et al. Ductile damage evolution under triaxial state of stress: theory and experiments. Int J Plast 2005; 21(5): 981-1007.

20

Yu F, Hendry MT, Jar PYB, et al. A coupled stress-triaxiality-dependent damage viscoplasticity model on crack initiation and propagation in high-strength rail steel. Theor Appl Fract Mec 2020; 109.

21

Zhu Y, Engelhardt MD. A nonlocal triaxiality and shear dependent continuum damage model for finite strain elastoplasticity. Eur J Mech A Solids 2018; 71: 16-33.

22

Murakami S. Continuum damage mechanics: a continuum mechanics approach to the analysis of damage and fracture. Springer Ebooks 2012; 41.B4:4731-4755.

23
Saanouni K. Damage mechanics in metal forming: Advanced modeling and numerical simulation. 2012.
24
Lemaitre J, Desmorat R. Engineering damage mechanics: ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures. 2005.
25

Saanouni K, Chaboche J-L. Computational damage mechanics: Application to metal forming. Comp Struct Intergrity 2003; 3: 321-376.

26

Ai S, Long H. A review on material fracture mechanism in incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2019; 104(1-4): 33-61.

27

Wu R, Hu Q, Li M, et al. Evaluation of the forming limit of incremental sheet forming based on ductile damage. J Mater Process Technol 2021; 287.

28

Lou Y, Huh H. Prediction of ductile fracture for advanced high strength steel with a new criterion: Experiments and simulation. J Mater Process Technol 2013; 213(8): 1284-1302.

29

Lou Y, Huh H, Lim S, et al. New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct 2012; 49(25): 3605-3615.

30

Mohsen S, Behrooz A, Roza D. Advanced virtual manufacturing systems: A review. J Adv Manuf Sci Tech 2023; 3(3): 2023009.

31

Su C, Zhang M, Yang H, et al. Study on forming limit of single-point progressive forming of AZ31B magnesium alloy under isothermal local loading. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2021; 118(1-2): 221-236.

32

Hou Y, Du K, Min J, et al. A generalized, computationally versatile plasticity model framework - Part Ⅰ: Theory and verification focusing on tension‒compression asymmetry. Int J Plast 2023; 171.

33

Bouchard PO, Bourgeon L, Fayolle S, et al. An enhanced Lemaitre model formulation for materials processing damage computation. Int J Mater Form 2010; 4(3): 299-315.

34

Gu B, He J, Li S, et al. Anisotropic fracture modeling of sheet metals: From in-plane to out-of-plane. Int J Solids Struct 2020; 182-183: 112-140.

35

Hansong JI, Qinghua S, Munish Kumar G, et al. Grain scale modelling and parameter calibration methods in crystal plasticity finite element researches: a short review. J Adv Manuf Sci Tech 2021; 1(2): 2021005.

36

Zhuang X, Meng Y, Zhao Z. Evaluation of prediction error resulting from using average state variables in the calibration of ductile fracture criterion. Int J Damage Mech 2017; 27(8): 1231-1251.

37

Besson J. Continuum models of ductile fracture: a review. Int J Damage Mech 2009; 19(1): 3-52.

38

Bao Y, Wierzbicki T. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci 2004; 46(1): 81-98.

39

Bai Y, Wierzbicki T. A new model of metal plasticity and fracture with pressure and Lode dependence. Int J Plast 2008; 24(6): 1071-1096.

40

Gurson AL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: Part Ⅰ—Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mat Tech 1977; 99(1): 2-15.

41

Needleman A, Tvergaard V. An analysis of ductile rupture in notched bars. J Mech Phys Solids 1984; 32(6): 461-490.

42

Tvergaard V. Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions. Int J Fracture 1981; 17(4): 389-407.

43

Lemaitre J. A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. Trans ASME J Eng Mate Tech, 1985. 107(1): 83-89.

44

Kachanov LM. Time of the rupture process under creep conditions, Izy Akad. Nank SSR Otd Tech Nauk 1958; 8: 26-31.

45

Badreddine H, Labergère C, Saanouni K. Ductile damage prediction in sheet and bulk metal forming. Comp Ren Méca 2016; 344(4-5): 296-318.

46

Cao TS, Gachet JM, Montmitonnet P, et al. A Lode-dependent enhanced Lemaitre model for ductile fracture prediction at low stress triaxiality. Eng Fract Mech 2014; 124-125: 80-96.

47

Boudifa M, Saanouni K, Chaboche J-L. A micromechanical model for inelastic ductile damage prediction in polycrystalline metals for metal forming. Int J Mech Sci 2009; 51(6): 453-464.

48

Labergere C, Rassineux A, Saanouni K. Numerical simulation of continuous damage and fracture in metal-forming processes with 2D mesh adaptive methodology. Finite Elem Anal Des 2014; 82: 46-61.

49

Yue Z, Cao K, Badreddine H, et al. Failure prediction on steel sheet under different loading paths based on fully coupled ductile damage model. Int J Mech Sci 2019; 153-154: 1-9.

50

Mirnia MJ, Shamsari M. Numerical prediction of failure in single point incremental forming using a phenomenological ductile fracture criterion. J Mater Process Technol 2017; 244: 17-43.

51

Ambrogio G, Filice L, Manco GL. Warm incremental forming of magnesium alloy AZ31. CIRP Annals 2008; 57(1): 257-260.

52

Cui Z, Cedric XZ, Ren F, et al. Modeling and validation of deformation process for incremental sheet forming. J Manuf Process 2013; 15 (2): 236-241.

53

Kumar A, Gulati V, Kumar P, et al. Parametric effects on formability of AA2024-O aluminum alloy sheets in single point incremental forming. J Mater Res Technol 2019; 8(1): 1461-1469.

54

Pandre S, Morchhale A, Mahalle G, et al. Fracture limit analysis of DP590 steel using single point incremental forming: experimental approach, theoretical modeling and microstructural evolution. Arch Civ and Mech Eng 2021; 21(3).

55

Azaouzi M, Lebaal N. Tool path optimization for single point incremental sheet forming using response surface method. Simul Model Pract Theory 2012; 24: 49-58.

56

Dunand M, Mohr D. On the predictive capabilities of the shear modified Gurson and the modified Mohr–Coulomb fracture models over a wide range of stress triaxialities and Lode angles. J Mech Phys Solids 2011; 59(7): 1374-1394.

57

Beese AM, Luo M, Li Y, et al. Partially coupled anisotropic fracture model for aluminum sheets. Eng Fract Mech 2010; 77(7): 1128-1152.

58

Gorji M B, Mohr D. Predicting shear fracture of aluminum 6016-T4 during deep drawing: Combining Yld-2000 plasticity with Hosford–Coulomb fracture model. Int J Mech Sci 2018; 137: 105-120.

59

Li Y, Luo M, Gerlach J, et al. Prediction of shear-induced fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 2010; 210(14): 1858-1869.

60

Roth CC, Mohr D. Ductile fracture experiments with locally proportional loading histories. Int J Plast 2016; 79: 328-354.

61

Mirnia MJ, Vahdani M, Shamsari M. Ductile damage and deformation mechanics in multistage single point incremental forming. Int J Mech Sci 2018; 136: 396-412.

62

Dizajyekan AZ, Mirnia MJ, Dariani BM. Fracture investigation in single point incremental forming of the Al/Cu laminated sheets using coupled damage plasticity model. CIRP J Manuf Sci Tec 2023; 43: 242-259.

63

Bharti S, Gupta A, Krishnaswamy H, et al. Evaluation of uncoupled ductile damage models for fracture prediction in incremental sheet metal forming. CIRP J Manuf Sci Tec 2022; 37: 499-517.

64

Zhan X, Wang Z, Li M, et al. Investigations on failure-to-fracture mechanism and prediction of forming limit for aluminum alloy incremental forming process. J Mater Process Technol 2020; 282.

65

Xue L, Wierzbicki T. Ductile fracture initiation and propagation modeling using damage plasticity theory. Eng Fract Mech 2008; 75(11): 3276-3293.

66

Malcher L, Andrade Pires FM, César de Sá JMA. An extended GTN model for ductile fracture under high and low stress triaxiality. Int J Plast 2014; 54: 193-228.

67

Gatea S, Ou H, Lu B, et al. Modelling of ductile fracture in single point incremental forming using a modified GTN model. Eng Fract Mech 2017; 186: 59-79.

68

Chang Z, Chen J. A new void coalescence mechanism during incremental sheet forming: Ductile fracture modeling and experimental validation. J Mater Process Technol 2021; 298.

69

Peng W, Ou H. Deformation mechanisms and fracture in tension under cyclic bending plus compression, single point and double-sided incremental sheet forming processes. Int J Mach Tool Manu 2023; 184: 103980.

70

Saanouni K. On the numerical prediction of the ductile fracture in metal forming. Eng Fract Mech 2008; 75(11): 3545-3559.

71

Badreddine H, Saanouni K, Dogui A. On non-associative anisotropic finite plasticity fully coupled with isotropic ductile damage for metal forming. Int J Plast 2010; 26(11): 1541-1575.

72

Zhang K, Badreddine H, Saanouni K. Ductile fracture prediction using enhanced CDM model with Lode angle-dependency for titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V at room temperature. J Mater Process Technol 2020; 277: 116462.

73

Zhang K, Badreddine H, Hfaiedh N, et al. Enhanced CDM model accounting of stress triaxiality and Lode angle for ductile damage prediction in metal forming. Int J Damage Mech 2021; 30(2): 260-282.

74

Said L B, Mars J, Wali M, et al. Numerical prediction of the ductile damage in single point incremental forming process. Int J Mech Sci 2017; 131-132: 546-558.

75

Bouhamed A, Mars J, Jrad H, et al. Identification of fully coupled nonassociated-Ductile damage constitutive equations for thin sheet metal applications: Numerical feasibility and experimental validation. ThinWalled Struct 2022; 176: 109365.

76

Jin K, Guo X, Tao J, et al. A model of one-surface cyclic plasticity with Lemaitre damage criterion for plastic instability prediction in the incremental forming process. Int J Mech Sci 2016; 114: 88-97.

77

Yue Z, Chu X, Gao J. Numerical simulation of incremental sheet forming with considering yield surface distortion. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2017; 92(5-8): 1761-1768.

78

Zhang K, Yue Z M, Su C J, et al. Modelling of ductile damage in single point incremental forming process using enhanced CDM model. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022; 1270(1).

79

Liu X, He J, Huang S. Mechanistically informed artificial neural network model for discovering anisotropic path-dependent plasticity of metals. Mater. Design 2023; 226.

80

Nagargoje A, Kankar PK, Jain PK, et al. Application of artificial intelligence techniques in incremental forming: a state-of-the-art review. J Intell Manuf 2021; 34(3): 985-1002.

Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology
Article number: 2025011
Cite this article:
ZHANG K, HU Y, WANG M, et al. Fracture prediction using damage models for incremental sheet forming process: A brief review. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2024, https://doi.org/10.51393/j.jamst.2025011

96

Views

4

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 20 July 2024
Revised: 05 August 2024
Accepted: 27 August 2024
Published: 06 September 2024
© 2025 JAMST

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0),which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return