PDF (7.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Abstract
Keywords
References
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese | Open Access

Effect of Chitosan-Tannic Acid Coating on the Microbial Diversity of Jiaohuaji Chicken

Xiaoqian ZHANG1,2 Wei SU1Xiaoli LIU1Genhe HU3Jianzhong ZHOU1Linlin FAN1 ()
Institute of Agro-product Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China
College of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
Changshu Wangsi Food Company Limited, Changshu 215500, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

In order to explore the effect of chitosan-tannic acid coating on the quality of Jiaohuaji chicken during storage, the microbial diversity of Jiaohuaji chicken with and without the coating treatment was evaluated. The changes in total bacterial count (TBC), pH, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) values during storage were analyzed as well. The results of high-throughput sequencing analysis showed that Bacillus, Streptophyta, and Prevotella were the dominant genera during the storage period of Jiaohuaji chicken. The abundance of Bacillus increased to 99.04% on the fifth day of storage (37 ℃), indicating it to be dominant. After the coating treatment, the abundance of Bacillus in Jiaohuaji chicken decreased by 13.53% whereas the abundance of Prevotella and other genera increased. In addition, the results of microbial and physicochemical analysis showed that the coating treatment kept the TBC below 5.0 (lg (CFU/g)) for 8 days (4 ℃), significantly reduced the pH, and decreased the TBARS and TVB-N values by 22.28%and 28.15%, respectively at the end of storage (4 ℃) compared with the blank control group. To sum up, the chitosan-tannic acid coating treatment changed the composition of the bacterial flora, inhibited the growth of spoilage bacteria to some extent, delayed lipid and protein oxidation, and prolonged the shelf life of Jiaohuaji chicken.

CLC number: TS251 Document code: A Article ID: 1002-6630(2024)11-0128-08

References

[5]

JIANG Q Q, ZHAO W T, ZHAO S, et al. Comparison between vacuum and modified-atmosphere packaging on dynamic analysis of flavor properties and microbial communities in fresh-cut potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.)[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 2023, 39: 101149. DOI:10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101149.

[6]

TRUCHADO P, ELSSER-GRAVESEN A, GIL M I, et al. Post-process treatments are effective strategies to reduce Listeria monocytogenes on the surface of leafy greens: a pilot study[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2020, 313: 108390. DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108390.

[8]

KUMAR S, MUKHERJEE A, DUTTA J. Chitosan based nanocomposite films and coatings: emerging antimicrobial food packaging alternatives[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2020, 97: 196-209. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.002.

[9]

KOOPMANN A K, SCHUSTER C, TORRES-RODRÍGUEZ J, et al. Tannin-based hybrid materials and their applications: a review[J]. Molecules, 2020, 25(21): 4910. DOI:10.3390/molecules25214910.

[10]

PANZELLA L, NAPOLITANO A. Condensed tannins, a viable solution to meet the need for sustainable and effective multifunctionality in food packaging: structure, sources, and properties[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2022, 70(3): 751-758. DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07229.

[11]

YONG H M, BI F Y, LIU J, et al. Preparation and characterization of antioxidant packaging by chitosan, D-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1 000 succinate and baicalein[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 153: 836-845. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.076.

[13]

ATARÉS L, CHIRALT A. Essential oils as additives in biodegradable films and coatings for active food packaging[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2016, 48: 51-62. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2015.12.001.

[14]

VAN DEN BROEK L A M, KNOOP R J I, KAPPEN F H J, et al. Chitosan films and blends for packaging material[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015, 116: 237-242. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.039.

[15]

WANG L, LIU T, LIU L, et al. Impacts of chitosan nanoemulsions with thymol or thyme essential oil on volatile compounds and microbial diversity of refrigerated pork meat[J]. Meat Science, 2022, 185: 108706. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108706.

[16]

HU F, SUN T, XIE J, et al. Functional properties and preservative effect on penaeus vannamei of chitosan films with conjugated or incorporated chlorogenic acid[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 159: 333-340. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.089.

[17]

ZHANG H Y, LI X L, KANG H B, et al. Effect of tannic acidgrafted chitosan coating on the quality of fresh pork slices during cold storage[J]. Meat Science, 2022, 188: 108779. DOI:10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108779.

[18]

LEE S J, GWAK M A, CHATHURANGA K, et al. Multifunctional chitosan/tannic acid composite films with improved anti-UV, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties for active food packaging[J]. Food Hydrocolloids, 2023, 136: 108249. DOI:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108249.

[19]

LEI Y, HUANG J C, CHENG Y Q, et al. Changes in bacterial communities and the volatilome of braised chicken with different packaging stored at 4 ℃[J]. Food Research International, 2022, 155: 111056. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111056.

[20]

SYROPOULOU F, PARLAPANI F F, BOSMALI I, et al. HRM and 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveal the cultivable microbiota of the European sea bass during ice storage[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2020, 327: 108658. DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108658.

[21]

WANG Z M, SHI Y Z, ZHOU K, et al. Effects of different thermal temperatures on the shelf life and microbial diversity of Dezhou-braised chicken[J]. Food Research International, 2020, 136: 109471. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109471.

[22]

ZHANG Y T, YAO Y J, GAO L F, et al. Characterization of a microbial community developing during refrigerated storage of vacuum packed Yao meat, a Chinese traditional food[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2018, 90: 562-569. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2018.01.005.

[23]

ANDRÉ S, VALLAEYS T, PLANCHON S. Spore-forming bacteria responsible for food spoilage[J]. Research in Microbiology, 2017, 168(4): 379-387. DOI:10.1016/j.resmic.2016.10.003.

[24]

SHAO L T, CHEN S S, WANG H D, et al. Advances in understanding the predominance, phenotypes, and mechanisms of bacteria related to meat spoilage[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2021, 118: 822-832. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.007.

[25]

DALGAARD P. Qualitative and quantitative characterization of spoilage bacteria from packed fish[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 1995, 26(3): 319-333. DOI:10.1016/0168-1605(94)00137-U.

[26]

GUO Y C, HUANG J C, CHEN Y R, et al. Effect of grape seed extract combined with modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of roast chicken[J]. Poultry Science, 2020, 99(3): 1598-1605. DOI:10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.024.

[28]

MARTIN XAVIER K A, HAUZOUKIM, KANNUCHAMY N, et al. Functionality of chitosan in batter formulations for coating of fish sticks: effect on physicochemical quality[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 169: 433-440. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.041.

[29]

RUIZ-CAPILLAS C, MORAL A. Sensory and biochemical aspects of quality of whole bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) during bulk storage in controlled atmospheres[J]. Food Chemistry, 2005, 89(3): 347-354. DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.02.041.

[31]

BEKHIT A E D A, HOLMAN B W B, GITERU S G, et al. Total volatile basic nitrogen(TVB-N)and its role in meat spoilage: a review[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2021, 109: 280-302. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.006.

[32]

JEON Y J, KAMIL J Y V A, SHAHIDI F. Chitosan as an edible invisible film for quality preservation of herring and atlantic cod[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2002, 50(18): 5167-5178. DOI:10.1021/jf011693l.

[33]

CEYLAN Z, ATICI C, UNAL K, et al. A novel material for the microbiological, oxidative, and color stability of salmon and chicken meat samples: nanofibers obtained from sesame oil[J]. Food Research International, 2023, 170: 112952. DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112952.

[34]

HALIM A L A, KAMARI A, PHILLIP E. Chitosan, gelatin and methylcellulose films incorporated with tannic acid for food packaging[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018, 120: 1119-1126. DOI:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.169.

[35]

GUO Q, REN C W, CAI J H, et al. The synergistic inhibition and mechanism of epicatechin gallate and chitosan against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the application in pork preservation[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2022, 163: 113575. DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113575.

Food Science
Pages 128-135
Cite this article:
ZHANG X, SU W, LIU X, et al. Effect of Chitosan-Tannic Acid Coating on the Microbial Diversity of Jiaohuaji Chicken. Food Science, 2024, 45(11): 128-135. https://doi.org/10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20231013-107
Metrics & Citations  
Article History
Copyright
Rights and Permissions
Return