AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica Article
PDF (10.5 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Research progress and future prospect of hydrogen micromix combustion technology

Da MO1,2,3, Yuzhen LIN1,2, Xiao HAN1,2( ), Hongyu MA3, Yixiong LIU3
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aero-Engine Aero-Thermodynamics, Research Institute of Aero-Engines, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Aero-Engines, Beijing 100191, China
AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Hydrogen fuel has significant importance in mitigating global climate change and protecting the environment by achieving zero carbon emission in aviation engines, aerospace propulsion engines, and ground gas turbines. However, the application of hydrogen combustion technology still faces many challenges. Hydrogen combustion in traditional burners poses a risk of flashback and high nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission. Thus, it requires exploration of new combustion technologies and pollution control measures to satisfy the urgent need of hydrogen energy. Micromix combustion technology implements hundreds of microchannels combined with micro-injection of hydrogen to rapidly mix air and hydrogen to form small-scale flames. The residence time of N2 in the high-temperature zone is shortened to the level of milliseconds, significantly reducing the production of nitrogen oxide. This paper reviews the application history of hydrogen in gas turbine engines and the progress of hydrogen combustion simulation and experimental studies, summarizes the hydrogen characteristics, NOx generation mechanism, micromix combustion principle, premixed combustion, diffusion combustion and dome structure characteristics, and discusses the influence of critical parameters of micromix combustors on aerothermodynamic process, NOx generation and control measures, providing theoretical and empirical bases for the engineering design of hydrogen combustion chambers. Finally, the future development of hydrogen combustion technology is prospected.

Keywords

hydrogenmicromix combustionpremixd combustiondiffusion combustionNOxthermoacoustic instability
CLC number: V231.2 Document code: A

References

1
Advisory Council for Aeronautics Research in Europe. Flightpath 2050 Europe’s vision for aviation [M]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011.
2
ROLT A M, KYPRIANIDIS K G. Assessment of new aeroengine core concepts and technologies in the EU framework 6 NEWAC programme [C] //27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Science. Nice: ICAS, 2010.
3
RALF D B. Low emissions core-engine technologies: Final publishable summary report: Innovative technologies for future gas-turbine core-engines [M]. Dahlewitz: Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, 2017.
4
LIN Y Z, XU Q H, LIU G E. Cas turbine combustor [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2008 (in Chinese).
5
ZHANG C, LIN Y Z, XU H S, et al. Development status and level of low emissions combustor technologies for civil aero-engine [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35 (2): 332-350 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
6
LIU J, ZHAO J W. Development of low emission combustor for foreign civil aeroengine [J]. Aeroengine, 2012, 38 (4): 11-16 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
7
YU H, SUO J Q, ZHU P F, et al. The characteristic of flow field and emissions of a concentric staged lean direct injection (LDI) combustor [J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2018, 36 (5): 816-823 (in Chinese).
Crossref Google Scholar
8
GHALI P F, LEI H R, KHANDELWAL B. A review of modern hydrogen combustor injection technologies for the aerospace sector [M] // Sustainable Development for Energy, Power, and Propulsion. Singapore: Springer, 2021.
Crossref Google Scholar
9
FLOTTAU J. Airbus presents three hydrogen- powered aircraft concepts [J]. Aviation Daily, 2020: 421 (55): 3-8.
Google Scholar
10
BARRETT S. H2GEAR hydrogen aircraft project for UK [J]. Fuel Cells Bulletin, 2021, 2021 (2): 6.
Crossref Google Scholar
11
DAILEY J R. Progress in power and safety [J]. Air & Space, 2013, 28 (2): 2.
Google Scholar
12
PERRY R, SLOOP J L. Liquid hydrogen as a propulsion fuel [J]. Technology and Culture, 1980, 21 (1): 136-138.
Crossref Google Scholar
13
HENRY M R, PATEL S. High speed container delivery system joint capability technology demonstration: AIAA-2015-2141 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015.
Crossref
14
ROSENBERG Z. Phantom eye UAV makes first flight [J]. Flight International, 2012, 181 (5345): 21.
Google Scholar
15
VERSTRAETE D. An assessment of the potential of hydrogen fuelled large long-range transport aircraft [C] //26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Anchorage: International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2008.
16
ONORATO G, PROESMANS P, HOOGREEF M F M. Assessment of hydrogen transport aircraft [J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2022, 13 (4): 813-845.
Crossref Google Scholar
17
PROESMANS P J, VOS R. Comparison of future aviation fuels to minimize the climate impact of commercial aircraft: AIAA-2022-3288 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2022.
Crossref
18
CIPOLLA V, ZANETTI D, SALEM K A, et al. A parametric approach for conceptual integration and performance studies of liquid hydrogen short-medium range aircraft [J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12 (14): 6857.
Crossref Google Scholar
19
HARTMANN C, NØLAND J K, NILSSEN R, et al. Dual use of liquid hydrogen in a next-generation PEMFC-powered regional aircraft with superconducting propulsion [J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2022, 8 (4): 4760-4778.
Crossref Google Scholar
20
ZHENG M W, YUE W L, SUN J G, et al. Discussion on Chinese large-thrust hydrogen/oxygen rocket engine development [J]. Astronautical Systems Engineering Technology, 2019, 3 (2): 12-17 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
21
FERNANDEZ-VILLACE V, PANIAGUA G. Numerical model of a variable-combined-cycle engine for dual subsonic and supersonic cruise [J]. Energies, 2013, 6 (2): 839-870.
Crossref Google Scholar
22
TANATUSGU N, SATO T, NARUO Y, et al. Development study on ATREX engine [J]. Acta Astronautica, 1997, 40 (2-8): 165-170.
Crossref Google Scholar
23
KYPRIANIDIS K G. Future aero engine designs: An evolving vision [M] // Advances in Gas Turbine Technology. Croatia: IntechOpen, 2011.
Google Scholar
24
KRAMER D. Hydrogen-Powered aircraft may be getting a lift [J]. Physics Today, 2020, 73 (12): 27-29.
Crossref Google Scholar
25
PALIES P P. Hydrogen thermal-powered aircraft combustion and propulsion system [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2022, 144 (10): 101007.
Crossref Google Scholar
26
NOBLE D, WU D, EMERSON B, et al. Assessment of current capabilities and near-term availability of hydrogen-fired gas turbines considering a low-carbon future [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2021, 143 (4): 041002.
Crossref Google Scholar
27
LACY B, ZIMINSKY W, LIPINSKI J, et al. Low emissions combustion system development for the GE energy high hydrogen turbine program [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2008: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. New York: ASME, 2009.
Crossref
28
LANTZ A, COLLIN R, ALDÉN M, et al. Investigation of hydrogen enriched natural gas flames in a SGT-700/800 burner using OH PLIF and chemiluminescence imaging [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2015, 137 (3): 031505.
Crossref Google Scholar
29
CHANG Y X, SONG H, HAN M, et al. Effects of hydrogen power ratio on combustion oscillation characteristics of hydrogen-enriched methane [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44 (1): 187-200 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
30
JU H Y, LIANG H X, SUO J Q, et al. Pollution emission characteristics of hydrogen-fueled combustor of an aero-engine conversion gas turbine [J/OL]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, (2023-03-15) [2023-04-20]. https://doi.org/10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2209039. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
31
CECERE D, GIACOMAZZI E, INGENITO A. A review on hydrogen industrial aerospace applications [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39 (20): 10731-10747.
Crossref Google Scholar
32
WINTER C J. Hydrogen in high-speed air transportation [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1990, 15 (8): 579-595.
Crossref Google Scholar
33
BRAND J, SAMPATH S, SHUM F, et al. Potential use of hydrogen in air propulsion: AIAA-2003-2879 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
Crossref
34
ZELDOVICH J. The oxidation of nitrogen in combustion and explosions [J]. European Physical Journal A. Hadrons and Nuclei, 1946, 21: 577-628.
Google Scholar
35
FENIMORE C P. Formation of nitric oxide in premixed hydrocarbon flames [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1971, 13 (1): 373-380.
Crossref Google Scholar
36
BAULCH D L, BOWMAN C T, COBOS C J, et al. Evaluated kinetic data for combustion modeling: supplement Ⅱ [J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 2005, 34 (3): 757-1397.
Crossref Google Scholar
37
QI F, LI Y Y, YUAN W H. Combustion reaction kinetics [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021 (in Chinese).
38
CEN K F, YAO Q, LUO Z Y, et al. Combustion theory and emission control [M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2019 (in Chinese).
39
LEFEBVRE A H. Fuel effects on gas turbine combustion-liner temperature, pattern factor, and pollutant emissions [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1984, 21 (11): 887-898.
Crossref Google Scholar
40
CHEN R H, DRISCOLL J F. Nitric oxide levels of jet diffusion flames: Effects of coaxial air and other mixing parameters [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1991, 23 (1): 281-288.
Crossref Google Scholar
41
LIN H J, CHANG F, CHENG M. The development of GE’s low emission combustion chamber [J]. Aerospace Power, 2019 (1): 31-36 (in Chinese).
Crossref Google Scholar
42
STOUFFER S, BALLAL D, ZELINA J, et al. Development and combustion performance of a high - pressure WSR and TAPS combustor: AIAA-2005-1416 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2005.
Crossref
43
BENIM A C, SYED K J. Flashback mechanisms in lean premixed gas turbine combustion [M]. Waltham: Academic Press, 2014.
Crossref
44
MO D, LIN Y Z, MA H Y, et al. Investigation on hydrogen micromix diffusive combustion organization based on bluff body disturbance [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45 (8): 128928 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
45
FUNKE H H W, BECKMANN N, KEINZ J, et al. 30 years of dry-low-NOx micromix combustor research for hydrogen-rich fuels: An overview of past and present activities [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2021, 143 (7): 071002.
Crossref Google Scholar
46
SETHI V, SUN X X, NALIANDA D, et al. Enabling cryogenic hydrogen-based CO2-Free air transport: Meeting the demands of zero carbon aviation [J]. IEEE Electrification Magazine, 2022, 10 (2): 69-81.
Crossref Google Scholar
47
FUNKE H H W, BOERNER S, KEINZ J, et al. Experimental and numerical characterization of the dry low NOx micromix hydrogen combustion principle at increased energy density for industrial hydrogen gas turbine applications [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2013.
Crossref
48
MAREK C, SMITH T, KUNDU K. Low emission hydrogen combustors for gas turbines using lean direct injection: AIAA-2005-3776 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2005.
Crossref
49
ZIEMANN J, SHUM F, MOORE M, et al. Low-NOx combustors for hydrogen fueled aero engine [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1998, 23 (4): 281-288.
Crossref Google Scholar
50
WEILAND N T, SIDWELL T G, STRAKEY P A. Testing of a hydrogen dilute diffusion array injector at gas turbine conditions [C] //Proceedings of ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2012.
Crossref
51
WEILAND N T, SIDWELL T G, STRAKEY P A. Testing of a hydrogen diffusion flame array injector at gas turbine conditions [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2013, 185 (7): 1132-1150.
Crossref Google Scholar
52
ASAI T, DODO S, KOIZUMI H, et al. Effects of multiple-injection-burner configurations on combustion characteristics for dry low-NOx combustion of hydrogen-rich fuels [C] //Proceedings of ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2012.
Crossref
53
LEE H, HERNANDEZ S, MCDONELL V, et al. Development of flashback resistant low-emission micro-mixing fuel injector for 100% hydrogen and syngas fuels [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. New York: ASME, 2010.
Crossref
54
BHAYARAJU U, HAMZA M, JENG S M. Development of porous injection technology to reduce emissions for dry low NOx combustors: micromixer and swirl injectors [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2017.
Crossref
55
HOLLON B, STEINTHORSSON E, MANSOUR A, et al. Ultra-low emission hydrogen/syngas combustion with a 1.3 MW injector using a micro-mixing lean-premix system [C] //Proceedings of ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2012.
Crossref
56
YORK W D, ZIMINSKY W S, YILMAZ E. Development and testing of a low NOx hydrogen combustion system for heavy-duty gas turbines [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2013, 135 (2): 022001.
Crossref Google Scholar
57
KIM D, JOO S, YOON Y. Effects of fuel line acoustics on the self-excited combustion instability mode transition with hydrogen-enriched laboratory-scale partially premixed combustor [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45 (38): 19956-19964.
Crossref Google Scholar
58
RAJASEGAR R, MITSINGAS C M, MAYHEW E K, et al. Development and experimental characterization of metal 3D-printed scalable swirl stabilized mesoscale burner array [C] //Proceedings of ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2018.
Crossref
59
CHOI J, RAJASEGAR R, LEE T H, et al. Development and characterization of swirl-stabilized diffusion mesoscale burner array [J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 175: 115373.
Crossref Google Scholar
60
CHOI J, RAJASEGAR R, MITSINGAS C M, et al. Effect of flame interaction on swirl-stabilized mesoscale burner array performance [J]. Energy, 2020, 192: 116661.
Crossref Google Scholar
61
CHOI J, RAJASEGAR R, LEE W, et al. Hydrogen enhancement on a mesoscale swirl stabilized burner array [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46 (46): 23906-23915.
Crossref Google Scholar
62
LANDRY-BLAIS A, SIVIĆ S, PICARD M. Micro-mixing combustion for highly recuperated gas turbines: Effects of inlet temperature and fuel composition on combustion stability and NOx emissions [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2022, 144 (9): 091014.
Crossref Google Scholar
63
LEI H R, KHANDELWAL B. Investigation of novel configuration of hydrogen micromix combustor for low NOx emission: AIAA-2020-1933 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2020.
Crossref
64
LIU X W, SHAO W W, LIU Y, et al. Cold flow characteristics of a novel high-hydrogen Micromix model burner based on multiple confluent turbulent round jets [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46 (7): 5776-5789.
Crossref Google Scholar
65
LIU X W, SHAO W W, LIU C, et al. Numerical study of a high-hydrogen micromix model burner using flamelet-generated manifold [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46 (39): 20750-20764.
Crossref Google Scholar
66
WANG Y L Y, CHEN J, MA R G, et al. Structure modification for combustor in gas turbine turning to burn hydrogen gas [J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2016, 45 (8): 53-57 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
67
TIAN X J, CUI Y F, FANG A B, et al. Numerical investigation on the effects of mixing zone structure on combustion induced vortex breakdown flashback limits of a swirl-premixed hydrogen flame [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2014, 34 (8): 1276-1284 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
68
DAVIES T W, BEÉR J M. Flow in the wake of bluff-body flame stabilizers [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1971, 13 (1): 631-638.
Crossref Google Scholar
69
FUNKE H H, BORNER S, ROBINSON A, et al. Low NOx H2 combustion for industrial gas turbines of various power ranges [C] //5th International Gas Turbine Conferenc. Brussels: European Turbine Network, 2010.
70
HORIKAWA A, OKADA K, UTO T, et al. Application of low NOx micro-mix hydrogen combustion to 2MW class industrial gas turbine combustor [C] //Proceedings of International Gas Turbine Congress. Tokyo: Gas Turbine Society of Japan, 2019.
71
FUNKE H H W, BECKMANN N, ABANTERIBA S. An overview on dry low NOx micromix combustor development for hydrogen-rich gas turbine applications [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44 (13): 6978-6990.
Crossref Google Scholar
72
FUNKE H H W, BOERNER S, KREBS W, et al. Experimental characterization of low NOx micromix prototype combustors for industrial gas turbine applications [C] //Proceedings of ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2012.
Crossref
73
SUN X X, AGARWAL P, CARBONARA F, et al. Numerical investigation into the impact of injector geometrical design parameters on hydrogen micromix combustion characteristics [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2020: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2021.
Crossref
74
MCCLURE J, ABBOTT D, AGARWAL P, et al. Comparison of hydrogen micromix flame transfer functions determined using RANS and LES [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2019.
Crossref
75
ZGHAL M, SUN X, GAUTHIER P Q, et al. Comparison of tabulated and complex chemistry turbulent-chemistry interaction models with high fidelity large eddy simulations on hydrogen flames [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2020: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2021.
Crossref
76
LIN Y Z, LI L, ZHANG C, et al. Progress on the mixing of liquid jet injected into a crossflow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35 (1): 46-57 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
77
PENG H, HUANG Y, LIU C, et al. Experimental study of effects of fluidic obstacle parameters on deflagration-to-detonation transition [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39 (2): 121412 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
78
FUNKE H H W, KEINZ J, KUSTERER K, et al. Development and testing of a low NOx micromix combustion chamber for industrial gas turbines [J]. International Journal of Gas Turbine, Propulsion and Power Systems, 2017, 9 (1): 27-36.
Crossref Google Scholar
79
FUNKE H H W, BECKMANN N, KEINZ J, et al. Numerical and experimental evaluation of a dual-fuel dry-low-NOx micromix combustor for industrial gas turbine applications [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2017.
Crossref
80
SUN X X, ABBOTT D, SINGH A V, et al. Numerical investigation of potential cause of instabilities in a hydrogen micromix injector array [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2021: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2021.
Crossref
81
AGARWAL P, SUN X X, GAUTHIER P Q, et al. Injector design space exploration for an ultra-low NOx hydrogen micromix combustion system [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2019.
Crossref
82
MURTHY P. Numerical study of hydrogen micro-mix combustors for aero gas turbine engines [D]. Bedford: Cranfield University, 2010.
83
KARAKURT A. Parametric investigation of combustion characteristics of hydrogen micromix combustor concept [D]. Bedford: Cranfield University, 2012.
84
Asanitthong S. Outlet temperature distribution control and heat transfer calculation for a hydrogen micromix combustor [D]. Bedford: Cranfield University, 2014.
85
JING D L, WANG K, CHEN X, et al. The progress on numerical simulation of combustion chamber [J]. Aerospace Power, 2018 (1): 44-47 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
86
SUO J Q, FENG X Z, LIANG H X, et al. Numerical simulation for research and development of aero engine combustor [J]. Aerospace Power, 2021 (2): 61-65 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
87
SHANG S T, LIN H J, CHENG M, et al. Engineering applications of numerical simulation technology for aero engine combustor [J]. Aerospace Power, 2021 (2): 66-69 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
88
RILEY J J. Review of large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2006, 128 (2): 209-215.
Crossref Google Scholar
89
PITSCH H, DE LAGENESTE L D. Large-eddy simulation of premixed turbulent combustion using a level-set approach [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29 (2): 2001-2008.
Crossref Google Scholar
90
FUNKE H H W, BECKMANN N, KEINZ J, et al. Comparison of numerical combustion models for hydrogen and hydrogen-rich syngas applied for dry-low-nox-micromix-combustion [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2018, 140 (8): 081504.
Crossref Google Scholar
91
SHIH T H, SMITH T, MAREK C, et al. Numerical study of a single hydrogen/air gas turbine fuel nozzle: AIAA-2003-4249 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
Crossref
92
OLM C, ZSÉLY I G, PÁLVÖLGYI R, et al. Comparison of the performance of several recent hydrogen combustion mechanisms [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2014, 161 (9): 2219-2234.
Crossref Google Scholar
93
KÉROMNÈS A, METCALFE W K, HEUFER K A, et al. An experimental and detailed chemical kinetic modeling study of hydrogen and syngas mixture oxidation at elevated pressures [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160 (6): 995-1011.
Crossref Google Scholar
94
HEALY D, KALITAN D M, AUL C J, et al. Oxidation of C1–C5 alkane quinternary natural gas mixtures at high pressures [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24 (3): 1521-1528.
Crossref Google Scholar
95
CONAIRE M Ó, CURRAN H J, SIMMIE J M, et al. A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2004, 36 (11): 603-622.
Crossref Google Scholar
96
KONNOV A A. Remaining uncertainties in the kinetic mechanism of hydrogen combustion [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 152 (4): 507-528.
Crossref Google Scholar
97
LI J, ZHAO Z W, KAZAKOV A, et al. A comprehensive kinetic mechanism for CO, CH2O, and CH3OH combustion [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2007, 39 (3): 109-136.
Crossref Google Scholar
98
STARIK A M, TITOVA N S, SHARIPOV A S, et al. Syngas oxidation mechanism [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2010, 46 (5): 491-506.
Crossref Google Scholar
99
SMITH G P, GOLDEN D M, FRENKLACH M. GRI-Mech 3.0 [S]. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
100
MAO M H, HUANG C F, SHI X J. Laser temperature measurement technology of advanced aero-engine combustor test [J]. Measurement & Control Technology, 2010, 29 (S1): 76-83 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
101
AN Q, STEINBERG A M. The role of strain rate, local extinction, and hydrodynamic instability on transition between attached and lifted swirl flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 199: 267-278.
Crossref Google Scholar
102
AN Q, KWONG W Y, GERAEDTS B D, et al. Coupled dynamics of lift-off and precessing vortex core formation in swirl flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2016, 168: 228-239.
Crossref Google Scholar
103
FU Z B, LIN Y Z, ZHANG C, et al. Experimental investigation on fuel-staging mode of internally-staged combustor under approach condition [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2014, 35 (1): 77-86 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
104
GIANNOULOUDIS A, SUN X, CORSAR M R, et al. On the development of an experimental gig for hydrogen micromix combustion testing [C] //Proceedings for the 10th European Combusiton Meeting. Naples: The Combustion Institute, 2021.
105
SCHEFER R W, SMITH T D, MAREK C J. Evaluation of NASA lean premixed hydrogen burner: SAND 2002-8609 [R]. Albuquerque: Sandia Corporation, 2003.
Crossref
106
HORIKAWA A, OKADA K, KAZARI M, et al. Application of low NOx micro-mix hydrogen combustion to industrial gas turbine combustor and conceptual design [C] //Proceedings of the International Gas Turbine Congress. Tokyo: European Turbine Network, 2015.
107
RAYLEIGH J W S, LINDSAY R B. The theory of sound, volume two [M]. New York: Dover Publications, 1945.
108
LIEUWEN T C, YANG V. Combustion instabilities in gas turbine engines: Operational experience, fundamental mechanisms and modeling [M]. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005.
Crossref
109
LIEUWEN T C. Unsteady combustor physics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Crossref
110
BEITA J, TALIBI M, SADASIVUNI S, et al. Thermoacoustic instability considerations for high hydrogen combustion in lean premixed gas turbine combustors: A review [J]. Hydrogen, 2021, 2 (1): 33-57.
Crossref Google Scholar
111
SUN X F, ZHANG G Y, WANG X Y, et al. Research progress in aero-engine combustion instability prediction and control [J/OL]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, (2023-05-15) [2023-05-20]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20230512.1358.008.html (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
112
LEE T, KIM K T. Combustion dynamics of lean fully-premixed hydrogen-air flames in a mesoscale multinozzle array [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2020, 218: 234-246.
Crossref Google Scholar
113
KANG H, KIM K T. Combustion dynamics of multi-element lean-premixed hydrogen-air flame ensemble [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2021, 233: 111585.
Crossref Google Scholar
114
HU X C, BI X T, LIU C, et al. Study of combustion characteristics and flame stabilization mechanism of hydrogen-containing micromix jet flames [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2023, 63 (4): 572-584 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
115
CAO Z, LYU Y J, PENG J B, et al. Experimental study of flame evolution, frequency and oscillation characteristics of steam diluted micro-mixing hydrogen flame [J]. Fuel, 2021, 301: 121078.
Crossref Google Scholar
116
LEFEBVRE A H, BALLAL D R. Gas turbine combustion: Alternative fuels and emissions, third edition [M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2010.
117
HOLDEMAN J D. Correlation for temperature profiles in the plane of symmetry downstream of a jet injected normal to a crossflow: NASA TN D-6966 [R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1972.
118
HOFERICHTER V, AHRENS D, KOLB M, et al. A reactor model for the NOx formation in a reacting jet in hot cross flow under atmospheric and high pressure conditions [C] //Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2014: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2014.
Crossref
119
BROADWELL J E, DAHM W J A, MUNGAL M G. Blowout of turbulent diffusion flames [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1985, 20 (1): 303-310.
Crossref Google Scholar
120
MO D, SHANG S T, LIN Y Z, et al. Numerical simulation investigation on a hydrogen micromix combustor [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38 (11): 2701-2710 (in Chinese).
Google Scholar
Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
Volume 45 Issue 7,
April 2024
Article number: 028994
DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28994
Cite this article:
MO D, LIN Y, HAN X, et al. Research progress and future prospect of hydrogen micromix combustion technology. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(7): 028994. https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28994

185

Views

7

Downloads

0

Crossref

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 15 May 2023
Revised: 16 June 2023
Accepted: 11 July 2023
Published: 24 July 2023
© 2024 The Journal of Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
Return