AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Publishing Language: Chinese

Prediction of multi-mode hypersonic boundary layer transition based on C-γ-Reθmodel

Zhenyu HU1Fengshou XIAO2Jianqiang CHEN1,3Xianxu YUAN1,3Yifeng ZHANG3Xinghao XIANG1( )
State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics, Mianyang 621000, China
Beijing System Design Institute of Electro-mechanic Engineering, Beijing 100039, China
Computational Aerodynamic Institute China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Standard models such as HIFiRE-5 and HyTRV are used in the validation of hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition. Hypersonic crossflow transition correction is proposed in the C-γ-Reθ transition model based on the original γ-Reθ transition model. In this study, the C-γ-Reθ transition model is applied to transition simulation of HIFiRE-5 and HyTRV under flight test and wind tunnel test conditions. For the flight test of HIFiRE-5, transition prediction is conducted under the conditions including eight typical altitudes and one attitude angle, the results of the C-γ-Reθ transition model are consistent with the heat-flux measurements, and the transition modes on the surface of HIFiRE-5 are compared. For the quiet/noise wind tunnel test of HIFiRE-5, the C-γ-Reθ transition model can accurately calculate the transition front shape and the transition onset location, and the results coincide with the temperature difference measurements. For the noise wind tunnel test of HyTRV, the C-γ-Reθ transition model calculation results of the upper and lower surfaces match with the infrared thermogram measurements under the conditions involving various Reynolds numbers and Mach numbers, and the ability to predict boundary layer transition in the crossflow mode is verified. Its prediction precision of the transition onset location and the transition front shape is on par with the eN method based on LST. As shown in the numerical simulation results, for each of the flight test and the quiet/noise wind tunnel test, the C-γ-Reθ transition model maintains high prediction reliability, and has achieved hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction for typical standard models.

CLC number: V211.3 Document code: A

References

1
CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition: What we know, where shall we go [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35 (3): 311-337 (in Chinese).
2
ZHOU L, ZHAO R, WU Y, et al. Application of improved k-ω-γ transition model to hypersonic complex configurations [J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57 (5): 2214-2221.
3
LIU Q Y, LEI J M, LIU Z, et al. γ-Ret-fRe transition model for compressible flow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (8): 327-337 (in Chinese).
4
LI Q, WAN B B, YANG K, et al. Experimental research on characteristics of pressure and heat flux fluctuation in hypersonic cone boundary layer [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (2): 124956 (in Chinese).
5
HUANG X Y, LI M D, WANG X L, et al. The Tianwen-1 guidance, navigation, and control for Mars entry, descent, and landing [J]. Space: Science & Technology, 2021, 2021: 9846185.
6
LI Q, YUAN W, ZHAO R, et al. Study on effect of aerodynamic configuration on aerodynamic performance of Mars ascent vehicles [J]. Space: Science and Technology, 2022, 2022: 9790131.
7
LIU K K, YAN C, HAO Z H. Cross-flow instability analysis and transition prediction of swept wing [J]. Physics of Gases, 2017, 2 (5): 18-24 (in Chinese).
8
LIU Q, TU G H, LUO Z B, et al. Progress in hypersonic boundary layer transition delay control [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (7): 025357 (in Chinese).
9
ZHOU L, YAN C, HAO Z H, et al. Transition model and transition criteria for hypersonic boundary layer flow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37 (4): 1092-1102 (in Chinese).
10
ZHANG H X. Investigations on fidelity of high order accurate numerical simulation for computational fluid dynamics [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34 (1): 1-4 (in Chinese).
11
LI Q, ZHAO R, ZHANG S J, et al. Study on dynamic characteristics of Mars entry module in transonic and supersonic speeds [J]. Space: Science and Technology, 2022, 2022: 9753286.
12
YUAN X X, HE K, CHEN J Q, et al. Preliminary transition research analysis of MF-1 [J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36 (2): 286-293 (in Chinese).
13
KONG W X, ZHANG H, YAN C. Transition criterion prediction method for hypersonic boundary layer [J]. Missiles and Space Vehicles, 2013 (5): 54-58 (in Chinese).
14
TANG D B. Boundary layer transition [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015: 31-34 (in Chinese).
15
LIU H K, CHEN J Q, XIANG X H, et al. Transition prediction for HIAD with different Reynolds numbers by improved k-ω-γ transition model [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44 (6): 126868 (in Chinese).
16
LANGTRY R B, MENTER F R. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes [J]. AIAA Journal, 2009, 47 (12): 2894-2906.
17
WANG L, FU S. A new transition/turbulence model for the flow transition in supersonic boundary layer [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2009, 41 (2): 162-168 (in Chinese).
18
WARREN E S, HASSAN H A. Transition closure model for predicting transition onset [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1998, 35 (5): 769-775.
19
ABDOL-HAMID K S. Assessments of k-kL turbulence model based on menter’s modification to rotta’s two-equation model [J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 2015: 987682.1.
20
ABDOL-HAMID K. Assessments of a Turbulence Model based on Menter’s Modification to Rotta’s Two-Equation Model [C] //Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2013: AIAA2013-341.
21
ZHANG H J, ZOU Z P, LI Y, et al. Conjugate heat transfer investigations of turbine vane based on transition models [J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26 (4): 890-897.
22
YUAN Z, ZHENG Q, YUE G Q, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation on aerodynamic performance of low-loaded and highly-loaded compressor cascades [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2021, 36 (4): 724-733 (in Chinese).
23
LI D C, WEI C, ZHANG T J, et al. Influence of turbulence intensity on aerodynamic characteristics of low Reynolds number airfoil [J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2022, 33 (2): 12-21 (in Chinese).
24
LANGTRY R B, SENGUPTA K, YEH D T, et al. Extending the γ-Reθtlocal correlation based transition model for crossflow effects [C] //45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2015: 2474.
25
ZHANG Y F, ZHANG Y R, CHEN J Q, et al. Numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary layer transition based on the flow solver chant 2.0 [C] //Proceedings of the 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2017: AIAA2017-2409.
26
XIANG X H, ZHANG Y F, YUAN X X, et al. C-γ-Reθ model for hypersonic three-dimensional boundary layer transition prediction [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42 (9): 625711 (in Chinese).
27
XIANG X H, CHEN J Q, YUAN X X, et al. Cross-flow transition model predictions of hypersonic transition research vehicle [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 122: 107327.
28
YANG T H, WANG Y W, WANG Y T, et al. Discrete adjoint-based optimization approach for laminar flow wings [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (12): 126132 (in Chinese).
29
RADEZTSKY R H, REIBERT M S, SARIC W S. Effect of isolated micron-sized roughness on transition in swept-wing flows [J]. AIAA Journal, 1999, 37 (11): 1370-1377.
30
KRIMMELBEIN N, KRUMBEIN A. Automatic transition prediction for three-dimensional configurations with focus on industrial application [C] //Proceedings of the 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2010: AIAA2010-4292.
31
JULIANO T J. Instability and transition on the HIFiRE-5 in a Mach-6 Quiet Tunnel [D]. West Lafayette: Purdue University Main Campus, 2010: 1-171.
32
JULIANO T J, POGGIE J, PORTER K, et al. HIFiRE-5b heat flux and boundary-layer transition [C] //Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2017: AIAA2017-3134.
33
CHEN J F, XU Y, JIANG W Q, et al. Infrared thermogram measurement experiment of hypersonic boundary-layer transition of a lifting body [J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, doi: 10.11729/syltlx20220030shu (in Chinese).
34
CHEN J F, LING G, ZHANG Q H, et al. Infrared thermography experiments of hypersonic boundary-layer transition on a 7° half-angle sharp cone [J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34 (1): 60-66 (in Chinese).
35
SHI Y Y, BAI J Q, HUA J, et al. Study and modification of cross-flow induced transition model based on local variables [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37 (3): 780-789 (in Chinese).
36
ZHANG H J, LI H Q, KANG H L, et al. Research on application and validation of compressibility correction γ-Reθ model for hypersonic boundary transition prediction [J]. Aerospace Technology, 2022 (4): 40-48 (in Chinese).
37
HOU Y, WRAY T, AGARWAL R K. Application of SST k-ω transition model to flow past smooth and rough airfoils [C] //Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2017: AIAA2017-3637.
38
CHEN J Q, TU G H, WAN B B, et al. Characteristics of flow field and boundary-layer stability of HyTRV [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42 (6): 124317 (in Chinese).
39
ZHU Z B, FENG F, SHEN Q. Large eddy simulation of crossflow transition characteristics in hypersonic elliptic cone boundary layer [J]. Physics of Gases, 2022, 7 (3): 60-72 (in Chinese).
40
ZHANG S L. The instability and wave propagation in the hypersonic 2: 1 elliptic cone boundary layer [D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2016 (in Chinese).
41
BORG M, KIMMEL R, STANFIELD S. HIFiRE-5 attachment-line and crossflow instability in a quiet hypersonic wind tunnel [C] //Proceedings of the 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
42
PAREDES P, GOSSE R, THEOFILIS V, et al. Linear modal instabilities of hypersonic flow over an elliptic cone [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 804: 442-466.
43
ZHU Z B, SHANG Q, SHEN Q. Crossflow modification of transition model for hypersonic boundary layer and its application [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (7): 125685 (in Chinese).
44
CHEN J F, XU Y, XU X B, et al. Experimental study on fluctuating pressure in hypersonic boundary layer with 7 sharp cone [J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 37 (6): 51-60 (in Chinese).
45
QI H, LI X L, YU C P, et al. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary layer transition over a lifting-body model HyTRV [J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2021, 3 (1): 31.
Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
Article number: 129215
Cite this article:
HU Z, XIAO F, CHEN J, et al. Prediction of multi-mode hypersonic boundary layer transition based on C-γ-Reθmodel. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(12): 129215. https://doi.org/10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29215

71

Views

2

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 25 June 2023
Revised: 18 July 2023
Accepted: 07 August 2023
Published: 15 December 2023
© 2024 The Journal of Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica
Return