AI Chat Paper
Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
{{expandStatus?'Exit ':''}}Advanced Search
Understanding the properties and behavior of water molecules in restricted geometries, such as the nanopores of rocks, is of interest for shale gas exploitation. We present herein ex situ and in situ nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies on the effects of water on the adsorption and diffusion of methane in nanopores. Silica materials with one-dimensional pores of ZSM-22, MCM-41, and SBA-15, with pore sizes ranging from 0.5 to 6 nm, were chosen as models. Hyperpolarized (HP) 129Xe NMR results show that water adsorption does not affect the pore sizes of ZSM-22 and MCM-41 but reduces that of SBA-15. The presence of water suppresses methane adsorption; this suppression effect is stronger in smaller pores. The self-diffusion coefficients of methane within ZSM-22 and MCM-41 are not significantly influenced by the presence of water, as measured by 1H pulsed field gradient (PFG) NMR. However, within SBA-15, which has a pore size of 6 nm, the diffusion coefficient of methane increases as the amount of water adsorption increases, peaks, and then decreases to a constant value with further water adsorption. These experiments reveal the effects of the pore size and the presence of water on methane adsorption and diffusion in constrained spaces, which could have important implications for flow simulations of methane in shales.
Wang, Y. F. Nanogeochemistry: Nanostructures, emergent properties and their control on geochemical reactions and mass transfers. Chem. Geol. 2014, 378–379, 1–23.
Bhattacharyya, K.; Bagchi, B. Slow dynamics of constrained water in complex geometries. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 10603–10613.
Middendorf, H. D. Neutron studies of the dynamics of biological water. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 1996, 226, 113–127.
EIA. Annual energy outlook 2014: With projections to 2040; U.S. Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, 2016.
Chalmers, G. R.; Bustin, R. M.; Power, I. M. Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units. AAPG Bull. 2012, 96, 1099–1119.
Clarkson, C. R.; Solano, N.; Bustin, R. M.; Bustin, A. M. M.; Chalmers, G. R. L.; He, L.; Melnichenko, Y. B.; Radlinski, A. P.; Blach, T. P. Pore structure characterization of North American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion. Fuel 2013, 103, 606–616.
Kuila, U.; Prasad, M. Specific surface area and pore-size distribution in clays and shales. Geophys. Prospect. 2013, 61, 341–362.
Loucks, R. G.; Reed, R. M.; Ruppel, S. C.; Jarvie, D. M. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale. J. Sediment. Res. 2009, 79, 848–861.
Dehghanpour, H.; Zubair, H. A.; Chhabra, A.; Ullah, A. Liquid intake of organic shales. Energy Fuels 2012, 26, 5750–5758.
Dehghanpour, H.; Lan, Q.; Saeed, Y.; Fei, H.; Qi, Z. Spontaneous imbibition of brine and oil in gas shales: Effect of water adsorption and resulting microfractures. Energy Fuels 2013, 27, 3039–3049.
King, G. E. Hydraulic fracturing 101: What every representative, environmentalist, regulator, reporter, investor, university researcher, neighbor and engineer should know about estimating frac risk and improving frac performance in unconventional gas and oil wells. In SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2012.
Zhao, J. Z.; Li, Z. Q.; Hu, Y. Q.; Ren, L.; Tao, Z. W. The impacts of microcosmic flow in nanoscale shale matrix pores on the gas production of a hydraulically fractured shale-gas well. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2016, 29, 431–439.
Tsirel, S. V. Methods of granular and fragmented material packing density calculation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 1997, 34, 263–273.
Zhao, D. Y.; Feng, J. L.; Huo, Q. S.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G. H.; Chmelka, B. F.; Stucky, G. D. Triblock copolymer syntheses of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 1998, 279, 548–552.
Beck, J. S.; Vartuli, J. C.; Roth, W. J.; Leonowicz, M. E.; Kresge, C. T.; Schmitt, K. D.; Chu, C. T. W.; Olson, D. H.; Sheppard, E. W.; Mccullen, S. B. et al. A new family of mesoporous molecular-sieves prepared with liquid-crystal templates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10834–10843.
Kittaka, S.; Ueda, Y.; Fujisaki, F.; Iiyama, T.; Yamaguchi, T. Mechanism of freezing of water in contact with mesoporous silicas MCM-41, SBA-15 and SBA-16: Role of boundary water of pore outlets in freezing. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 17222–17233.
Morishige, K.; Yasunaga, H.; Denoyel, R.; Wernert, V. Pore-blocking-controlled freezing of water in cagelike pores of KIT-5. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 9488–9495.
Webber, J. B. W.; Dore, J. C.; Strange, J. H.; Anderson, R.; Tohidi, B. Plastic ice in confined geometry: The evidence from neutron diffraction and NMR relaxation. J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 2007, 19, 415117.
Takamuku, T.; Yamagami, M.; Wakita, H.; Masuda, Y.; Yamaguchi, T. Thermal property, structure, and dynamics of supercooled water in porous silica by calorimetry, neutron scattering, and NMR relaxation. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 5730–5739.
Briman, I. M.; Rébiscoul, D.; Diat, O.; Zanotti, J. -M.; Jollivet, P.; Barboux, P.; Gin, S. Impact of pore size and pore surface composition on the dynamics of confined water in highly ordered porous silica. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 7021–7028.
Kiwilsza, A.; Pajzderska, A.; Gonzalez, M. A.; Mielcarek, J.; Wasicki, J. QENS and NMR study of water dynamics in SBA-15 with a low water content. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 16578–16586.
Grünberg, B.; Emmler, T.; Gedat, E.; Shenderovich, I.; Findenegg, G. H.; Limbach, H. H.; Buntkowsky, G. Hydrogen bonding of water confined in mesoporous silica MCM-41 and SBA-15 studied by 1H solid-state NMR. Chem. —Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5689–5696.
de la Llave, E.; Molinero, V.; Scherlis, D. A. Water filling of hydrophilic nanopores. J. Chem. Phys. 2010, 133, 034513.
de la Llave, E.; Molinero, V.; Scherlis, D. A. Role of confinement and surface affinity on filling mechanisms and sorption hysteresis of water in nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 1833–1840.
Phan, A.; Cole, D. R.; Striolo, A. Aqueous methane in slit-shaped silica nanopores: High solubility and traces of hydrates. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 4860–4868.
Phan, A.; Cole, D. R.; Weiβ, R. G.; Dzubiella, J.; Striolo, A. Confined water determines transport properties of guest molecules in narrow pores. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7646–7656.
Kokotailo, G. T.; Schlenker, J. L.; Dwyer, F. G.; Valyocsik, E. W. The framework topology of ZSM-22: A high silica zeolite. Zeolites 1985, 5, 349–351.
Weiland, E.; Springuel-Huet, M. -A.; Nossov, A.; Gédéon, A. 129Xenon NMR: Review of recent insights into porous materials. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2016, 225, 41–65.
Kruk, M.; Jaroniec, M.; Kim, J. M.; Ryoo, R. Characterization of highly ordered MCM-41 silicas using X-ray diffraction and nitrogen adsorption. Langmuir 1999, 15, 5279–5284.
Kruk, M.; Jaroniec, M.; Ko, C. H.; Ryoo, R. Characterization of the porous structure of SBA-15. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 1961–1968.
Bowsher, L. G.; Hall, P. G. An NMR investigation of the adsorption of acetaldehyde and acetone vapors on silica (cabosil). Sep. Sci. Technol. 1978, 13, 335–346.
Hunger, J.; Beta, I. A.; Böhlig, H.; Ling, C.; Jobic, H.; Hunger, B. Adsorption structures of water in NaX studied by DRIFT spectroscopy and neutron powder diffraction. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 342–353.
Di Lella, A.; Desbiens, N.; Boutin, A.; Demachy, I.; Ungerer, P.; Bellat, J. P.; Fuchs, A. H. Molecular simulation studies of water physisorption in zeolites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 8, 5396–5406.
Ito, T.; Fraissard, J. 129Xe NMR study of xenon adsorbed on Y zeolites. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 5225–5229.
Nossov, A.; Haddad, E.; Guenneau, F.; Galarneau, A.; Di Renzo, F.; Fajula, F.; Gédéon, A. Characterization of the porosity in SBA-15 silicas by hyperpolarized 129Xe NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 12456–12460.
Hu, Y. L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, M. R.; Pan, X. L.; Fang, B.; Zhuang, W.; Han, X. W.; Bao, X. H. Facilitated diffusion of methane in pores with a higher aromaticity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 19885–19889.
Kärger, J.; Ruthven, D. M. Diffusion in Zeolites and Other Microporous Solids; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992.
Walker, T. G.; Happer, W. Spin-exchange optical pumping of noble-gas nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1997, 69, 629–642.
Cotts, R. M.; Hoch, M. J. R.; Sun, T.; Markert, J. T. Pulsed field gradient stimulated echo methods for improved NMR diffusion measurements in heterogeneous systems. J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 83, 252–266.
京公网安备11010802044758号