AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Improving profile accuracy and surface quality of blisk by electrochemical machining with a micro inter-electrode gap

Jingtao WANGZhengyang XUDi ZHU,( )
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Electrochemical machining (ECM) has emerged as an important option for manufacturing the blisk. The inter-electrode gap (IEG) distribution is an essential parameter for the blisk precise shaping process in ECM, as it affects the process stability, profile accuracy and surface quality. Larger IEG leads to a poor localization effect and has an adverse influence on the machining accuracy and surface quality of blisk. To achieve micro-IEG (<50 μm) blisk finishing machining, this work puts forward a novel variable-parameters blisk ECM strategy based on the synchronous coupling mode of micro-vibration amplitude and small pulse duration. The modelling and simulation of the blisk micro-IEG machining have been carried out. Exploratory experiments of variable-parameters blisk ECM were carried out. The results illustrated that the IEG width reduced with the progress of variable parameter process. The IEG width of the blade’s concave part and convex part could be successfully controlled to within 30 μm and 21 μm, respectively. The profile deviation for the blade’s concave surface and convex surface are 49 μm and 35 μm, while the surface roughness reaches Ra = 0.149 μm and Ra = 0.196 μm, respectively. The profile accuracy of the blisk leading/trailing edges was limited to within 91 μm. Compared with the currently-established process, the profile accuracy of the blade’s concave and convex profiles was improved by 50.5 % and 53.3 %, respectively. The surface quality was improved by 53.2 % and 50.9 %, respectively. Additionally, the machined surface was covered with small corrosion pits and weak attacks of the grain boundary due to selective dissolution. Some electrolytic products were dispersed on the machined surface, and their components were mainly composed of the carbide and oxide products of Ti and Nb elements. The results indicate that the variable-parameters strategy is effective for achieving a tiny IEG in blisk ECM, which can be used in engineering practice.

References

1

Pan B, Kim D, Kim BM, et al. Incremental deformation and the forgeability of titanium aluminide. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2001;41(5):749–59.

2

Fang Z, Obikawa T. Turning of Inconel 718 using inserts with cooling channels under high pressure jet coolant assistance. J Mater Process Technol 2017;247:19–28.

3

Klocke F, Zeis M, Klink A, et al. Experimental research on the electrochemical machining of modern titanium- and nickel-based alloys for aero engine components. Procedia CIRP 2013;6:368–72.

4

Stenerud G, Wenner S, Olsen JS, et al. Effect of different microstructural features on the hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility of alloy 718. Int J Hydrog Energy 2018;43(13):6765–76.

5

Hinduja S, Pattavanitch J. Experimental and numerical investigations in electro-chemical milling. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2016;12:79–89.

6

Raab U, Levin S, Wagner L, et al. Orbital friction welding as an alternative process for blisk manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 2015;215:189–92.

7

Bonakdar A, Molavi-Zarandi M, Chamanfar A, et al. Finite element modeling of the electron beam welding of Inconel-713LC gas turbine blades. J Manuf Process 2017;26:339–54.

8

González-Barrio H, Calleja-Ochoa A, Lamikiz A, et al. Manufacturing processes of integral blade rotors for turbomachinery, processes and new approaches. Appl Sci-Basel 2020;10(9):3063. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093063.

9

Jia Y, Chi G, Shen Y, et al. Electrode design using revolving entity extraction for high-efficiency electric discharge machining of integral shrouded blisk. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(6):178–87.

10

Pawar A, Kamble D, Ghorpade RR. Overview on electro-chemical machining of super alloys. Mater Today-Proc 2021;46:696–700.

11

Hood R, Aspinwall DK, Soo SL, et al. Workpiece surface integrity when slot milling gamma-TiAl intermetallic alloy. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 2014;63(1):53–6.

12

Cao W, Wang D, Zhu D. Modeling and experimental validation of interelectrode gap in counter-rotating electrochemical machining. Int J Mech Sci 2020;187:105920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105920.

13

Xu Z, Wang Y. Electrochemical machining of complex components of aero-engines: developments, trends, and technological advances. Chin J Aeronaut 2021;34(2):28–53.

14

Klocke F, Zeis M, Klink A, et al. Technological and economical comparison of roughing strategies via milling, EDM and ECM for titanium- and nickel-based blisks. Procedia CIRP 2012;2:98–101.

15

Lei G, Zhu D, Zhu D. Feeding strategy optimization for a blisk with twisted blades in electrochemical trepanning. J Manuf Process 2021;62:591–9.

16

Ernst A, Heib T, Hall T, et al. Simulation of the tool shape design for the electrochemical machining of jet engine vanes. Proc CIRP 2018;68:762–7.

17

Wang J, Xu Z, Wang J, et al. Electrochemical machining of blisk channels with rotations of the cathode and the workpiece. Int J Mech Sci 2021;208:106655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106655.

18

Zhang J, Song S, Zhang J, et al. Multi-Physics Coupling modeling and experimental investigation of vibration-assisted blisk channel ECM. Micromachines 2022;13(1):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13010050.

19

Wang H, Zhu D, Liu J. Improving the accuracy of the blade leading/trailing edges by electrochemical machining with tangential feeding. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 2019;68(1):165–8.

20

Hewidy MS, Ebeid SJ, El-Taweel TA, et al. modelling the performance of ECM assisted by low frequency vibrations. J Mater Process Technol 2007;189(1–3):466–72.

21

Natsu W, Nakayama H, Yu Z. Improvement of ECM characteristics by applying ultrasonic vibration. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2012;13(7):1131–6.

22

Xu L, Pan Y. Electrochemical micromachining using vibrating tool electrode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2014;75(5–8):645–50.

23

Bhattacharyya B, Malapati M, Munda J, et al. Influence of tool vibration on machining performance in electrochemical micro-machining of copper. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 2007;47(2):335–42.

24

Kurogi S, Natsu W, Yu ZY. Investigation of machining characteristics of ultrasonic vibration assisted ECM. Appl Mech Mater 2012;217–219(1–3):2555–9.

25

Liu Y, Liu J, Zhu D, et al. Design and optimization of electrolyte flow fields in electrochemical machining of cross-channel array with tool vibration. Chin J Aeronaut 2022;35(4):461–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2021.07.029.

26

Ghoshal B, Bhattacharyya B. Vibration assisted electrochemical micromachining of high aspect ratio micro features. Precis Eng 2015;42:231–41.

27

De Silva AKM, Altena HSJ, McGeough JA. Influence of electrolyte concentration on copying accuracy of precision ECM. CIRP Ann 2003;52(1):165–8.

28

Wang D, Li J, He B, et al. Analysis and control of inter-electrode gap during leveling process in counter-rotating electrochemical machining. Chin J Aeronaut 2019;32(11):2557–65.

29

Wang J, Xu Z, Liu J, et al. Real-time vision-assisted electrochemical machining with constant inter-electrode gap. J Manuf Process 2021;71:384–97.

30

Lei G, Zhu D, Zhu D. Research on multiphysics coupling fields in electrochemical trepanning of lateral flow. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022;119(7–8):5131–41.

31

Chen Y, Zhou X, Chen P, et al. Electrochemical machining gap prediction with multi-physics coupling model based on two-phase turbulence flow. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(3):1057–63.

32

Wang MH, Tong WJ, Qiu GZ, et al. Multiphysics study in air-shielding electrochemical micromachining. J Manuf Process 2019;43:124–35.

33

Fujisawa T, Inaba K, Yamamoto M, et al. Multiphysics simulation of electrochemical machining process for three-dimensional compressor blade. J Fluid Eng 2008;130(8). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2956596.

34

Saxena KK, Chen X, Qian J, et al. A tool-based precision hybrid laser-electrochemical micromachining process: process analysis by multidisciplinary simulations and experiments. J Electrochem Soc 2020;167(14):143502. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abc10c.

35

Chen Y, Fang M, Jiang L. Multiphysics simulation of the material removal process in pulse electrochemical machining (PECM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2017;91(5–8):2455–64.

36

Liu G, Tong H, Li Y, et al. Multiphysics research on electrochemical machining of micro holes with internal features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;110(5–6):1527–42.

37

Fang X, Qu N, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of pulsating electrolyte flow in electrochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol 2014;214(1):36–43.

38

Kozak J. Thermal models of pulse electrochemical machining. Bull Pol Acad Sci Technol 2004;52(4):313–20.

39

He Y, Gan W, Yin F, et al. Multi-physical field coupling for vibration feed electrochemical machining of diamond-shaped hole in titanium alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2020;106(3–4):1409–20.

40

Jiang X, Liu J, Zhu D, et al. Research on stagger coupling mode of pulse duration and tool vibration in electrochemical machining. Appl Sci 2018;8(8):1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8081296.

41

Malouche MM, Stein N, Lecomte J, et al. Influence of the electrolyte composition on the electrochemical dissolution behavior of forged Inconel 718. J Appl Electrochem 2020;50(2):197–206.

42

Wang J, Xu Z, Wang J, et al. Anodic dissolution characteristics of Inconel 718 in C6H5K3O7 and NaNO3 solutions by pulse electrochemical machining. Corrosion Sci 2021;183:109335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109335.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 523-537
Cite this article:
WANG J, XU Z, ZHU D. Improving profile accuracy and surface quality of blisk by electrochemical machining with a micro inter-electrode gap. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(4): 523-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.07.005

31

Views

19

Crossref

14

Web of Science

18

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 26 March 2022
Revised: 14 April 2022
Accepted: 10 May 2022
Published: 16 July 2022
© 2022 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return