AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Spray characteristics of different regions downstream of a swirl cup

Donghui WANGa,bYong HUANGa,b,( )Hongzhou ZHANGa,b
Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, China
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The spray characteristics of different regions downstream of swirl cups play a critical role in cold start and re-ignition of gas turbines. The spray measurements were performed at the fuel pressures of 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 MPa and the fuel temperatures of −23, −13, −3, 7, 17 and 27 ℃, respectively. The droplet size, droplet velocity, droplet number, and instantaneous spatial spray image of sprays from an aviation kerosene Jet-A were measured using a two-component phase Doppler particle analyzer and a digital off-axis holography system. As the fuel pressure and temperature increase, the Sauter Mean Diameter (SMD) and spray non-uniformity of the Spray Shear Layer (SSL) gradually decrease. As the fuel pressure increases, the SMD and spray non-uniformity of the Central Toroidal Recirculation Zone (CTRZ) gradually decrease, and the slopes of these curves both decrease. As the fuel pressure increases, the SMD and spray non-uniformity of the CTRZ rapidly decrease at the fuel temperature of −23 ℃, while slightly decrease at the fuel temperature of 27 ℃. The droplets in the CTRZ come from 3 different sources: simplex nozzle, venturi, and outside the CTRZ. As the fuel pressure increases, the proportion of droplets recirculated from outside the CTRZ decreases. This study proposed the concept of the “pressure critical point” for the swirl cups. As the fuel temperature decreases, the proportion of droplets recirculated from outside the CTRZ increases below the critical pressure, while decreases above the critical pressure. In addition, through the models of liquid film formation and breakup on the curved cylindrical wall, a semi-theoretical model was established to predict the SMD of SSL for swirl cups. The prediction uncertainty of this model is less than 6% for all 14 conditions in this paper.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cja-37-8-124_ESM.pdf (362 KB)

References

1

Huang Y, Yang V. Dynamics and stability of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2009;35(4):293–364.

2

Li L, Lin YZ, Fu ZB, et al. Emission characteristics of a model combustor for aero gas turbine application. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2016;72:235–48.

3

Dafsari RA, Lee HJ, Han J, et al. Viscosity effect on the pressure swirl atomization of an alternative aviation fuel. Fuel 2019;240:179–91.

4

Lee EJ, Oh SY, Kim HY, et al. Measuring air core characteristics of a pressure-swirl atomizer via a transparent acrylic nozzle at various Reynolds numbers. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2010;34(8):1475–83.

5

Zhao QP, Yang JH, Mu Y, et al. Experimental investigation of flow field features and spark ignition process in a multi-swirl airblast injector. Fuel 2021;306:121732.

6

Liu YZ, Sun XX, Sethi V, et al. Review of modern low emissions combustion technologies for aero gas turbine engines. Prog Aerosp Sci 2017;94:12–45.

7

Khosravy el_Hossaini M. Review of the new combustion technologies in modern gas turbines. Progress in gas turbine performance. London: IntechOpen; 2013.

8

Fan XJ, Liu CX, Xu G, et al. Experimental investigations of the spray structure and interactions between sectors of a double-swirl low-emission combustor. Chin J Aeronaut 2020;33(2):589–97.

9

Roisman IV, van Hinsberg NP, Tropea C. Propagation of a kinematic instability in a liquid layer: capillary and gravity effects. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2008;77(4):046305.

10

Shanmugadas KP, Chakravarthy SR, Chiranthan RN, et al. Characterization of wall filming and atomization inside a gas-turbine swirl injector. Exp Fluids 2018;59(10):151.

11

Yuan WW, Huang Y, Zhang HZ. Semi-empirical model for the liquid fuel film formed by an oblique jet impinging on a curved wall. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2023;146:110919.

12

Shin D, Satija A, Lucht RP. Spray characteristics of standard and alternative aviation fuels at high ambient pressure conditions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2022;130:110511.

13

Yao KH, He XM, Jin Y, et al. Investigations of the effect of the primary hole on ignition performance of a three-dome model combustor with RP-3 liquid aviation fuel. Aerosp Sci Technol 2023;139:108403.

14

Park BS, Kim HY, Yoon SS. Transitional instability of a pressure-swirl atomizer due to air-core eruption at low temperature. Atomiz Spr 2007;17(6):551–68.

15

Sivakumar D, Vankeswaram SK, Sakthikumar R, et al. Analysis on the atomization characteristics of aviation biofuel discharging from simplex swirl atomizer. Int J Multiph Flow 2015;72:88–96.

16

Rezaei S, Vashahi F, Ryu G, et al. On the correlation of the primary breakup length with fuel temperature in pressure swirl nozzle. Fuel 2019;258:116094.

17

Cai WZ, Li W, Zhao YY, et al. Experimental research on the influence of aviation fuel temperature on swirl nozzle velocity. Fuel 2021;289:119765.

18
Shanmugadas KP, Chakravarthy SR. Wall filming and atomization inside a simplified pre-filming coaxial swirl injector: Role of unsteady aerodynamics. Reston: AIAA; 2018. Report No.: AIAA-2018-0395.
19
Fu YQ, Cai J, Elkady A, et al. Fuel and equivalence ratio effects on spray combustion of a counter-rotating swirler. Reston: AIAA; 2005. Report No.: AIAA-2005-0354.
20

Li ZX, Guo ZH, Che JL, et al. Flow field and spray of a high shear airblast nozzle. J Aerospace Power 2014;29(11):2704–9 [Chinese].

21

Shanmugadas KP, Manuprasad ES, Chiranthan RN, et al. Fuel placement and atomization inside a gas-turbine fuel injector at realistic operating conditions. Proc Combust Inst 2021;38(2):3261–8.

22

Rajamanickam K, Potnis A, Sakthi Kumar KR, et al. On the influence of geometrical parameters on the spray characteristics of high shear injectors. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2019;109:109872.

23

Kumar S, Malavalli S, Chaudhuri S, et al. Spray characteristics and flow topologies of high shear injector at high primary swirl. Int J Multiph Flow 2020;131:103393.

24

Hadef R, Lenze B. Measurements of droplets characteristics in a swirl-stabilized spray flame. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2005;30(2):117–30.

25

Zhao QP, Liu FQ, Wang SL, et al. Experimental investigation on spark ignition of multi-swirl spray flames under sub-atmospheric pressures and low temperatures. Fuel 2022;326:125004.

26

Liu CX, Liu FQ, Yang JH, et al. Investigations of the effects of spray characteristics on the flame pattern and combustion stability of a swirl-cup combustor. Fuel 2015;139:529–36.

27

Wang XW, Huang Y, Liu YF, et al. Effect of the ignition location on lean light-off limits for a gas turbine combustor. Combust Flame 2022;245:112295.

28

Naber J, Reitz RD. Modeling engine spray/wall impingement. Warrendale: SAE International; 1988.

29

Ibrahim EA, Przekwas AJ. Impinging jets atomization. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 1991;3(12):2981–7.

30

Senecal PK, Schmidt DP, Nouar I, et al. Modeling high-speed viscous liquid sheet atomization. Int J Multiph Flow 1999;25(6–7):1073–97.

31

Wang HY, McDonell VG, Sowa WA, et al. Scaling of the two-phase flow downstream of a gas turbine combustor swirl cup: Part Ⅰ—Mean quantities. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1993;115(3):453–60.

32

Wang HY, McDonell VG, Sowa WA, et al. Experimental study of a model gas turbine combustor swirl cup, Part Ⅱ: Droplet dynamics. J Propuls Power 1994;10(4):446–52.

33
Mongia H, Al-Roub M, Danis A, et al. Swirl cup modeling. I. Reston: AIAA; 2001. Report No.: AIAA-2001-3576.
34

Wang L, Wu YC, Zhang LT, et al. Conical liquid sheet morphology and 3D droplet distribution of aviation kerosene pressure-swirl spray with digital off-axis holography. Opt Laser Technol 2023;162:109250.

35

Wu YC, Wang L, Lin WH, et al. Picosecond pulsed digital off-axis holography for near-nozzle droplet size and 3D distribution measurement of a swirl kerosene spray. Fuel 2021;283:119124.

36

Briones AM, Stouffer SD, Vogiatzis K, et al. Effects of effusion and film cooling jet momenta on combustor flow fields. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2018;140(8):081503.

37
Erdmann TJ, Burrus DL, Briones AM, et al. Experimental and computational characterization of flow rates in a multiplepassage gas turbine combustor swirler. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2017: Turbomachinery technical conference and exposition. New York: ASME; 2017.
38

Hasti VR, Kundu P, Som S, et al. Numerical simulations and analysis of the turbulent flow field in a practical gas turbine engine combustor. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 2022;236(4):662–72.

39

Colket M, Heyne J, Rumizen M, et al. Overview of the national jet fuels combustion program. AIAA J 2017;55(4):1087–104.

40

Council C R. Handbook of aviation fuel properties. Warrendale: Society of Automotive Engineers; 2004.

41
Yao L C. Digital holographic method and application to measurement of particle combustion and droplet atomization [dissertation]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University; 2019 [Chinese].
42

Ding GY, He XM, Zhao ZQ, et al. Effect of dilution holes on the performance of a triple swirler combustor. Chin J Aeronaut 2014;27(6):1421–9.

43
Fu YQ, Cai J, Jeng SM, et al. Confinement effects on the swirling flow of a counter-rotating swirl cup. Proceedings of ASME turbo expo 2005: Power for land, sea, and air. New York: ASME; 2005.
44
Fu YQ, Cai J, Jeng SM, et al. Characteristics of the swirling flow generated by a counter-rotating swirler. Reston: AIAA; 2007. Report No.: AIAA-2007-5690.
45

Shanmugadas KP, Chakravarthy SR. A canonical geometry to study wall filming and atomization in pre-filming coaxial swirl injectors. Proc Combust Inst 2017;36(2):2467–74.

46

Inamura T, Amagasaki S, Yanaoka H. Thickness of liquid film formed by impinging jets on a concave wall. J Propuls Power 2007;23(3):612–7.

47

Inamura T, Yanaoka H, Tomoda T. Prediction of mean droplet size of sprays issued from wall impingement injector. AIAA J 2004;42(3):614–21.

48

Yuan W, Huang Y, Zhang H. Study of the thickness of the liquid film formed by a round water jet impinging on a curved cylindrical wall. Phys Fluids 2023;35(5):053602.

49

Shin D, Rodrigues NS, Bokhart AJ, et al. Spray characteristics of standard and alternative aviation fuels at cold-start conditions. AIAA J 2021;59(12):5238–50.

50

Sojka PE, Knoll KE. Flat-sheet twin-fluid atomization of high-viscosity fluids. Part Ⅰ: Newtonian liquids. Atomiz Spr 1992;2(1):17–36.

51

Rajamanickam K, Basu S. On the dynamics of vortex–droplet interactions, dispersion and breakup in a coaxial swirling flow. J Fluid Mech 2017;827:572–613.

52

Lefebvre AH, McDonell VG. Atomization and sprays. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017.

53

Rizk NK, Lefebvre AH. The influence of liquid film thickness on airblast atomization. J Eng Power 1980;102(3):706–10.

54

Simmons HC, Harding CF. Some effects of using water as a test fluid in fuel nozzle spray analysis. J Eng Power 1981;103(1):118–23.

55

Stapper BE, Sowa WA, Samuelsen GS. An experimental study of the effects of liquid properties on the breakup of a two-dimensional liquid sheet. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1992;114(1):39–45.

56

Lee JG, Chen LD. Linear stability analysis of gas-liquid interface. AIAA J 1991;29(10):1589–95.

57

Kawano S, Hashimoto H, Togari H, et al. Deformation and breakup of an annular liquid sheet in a gas stream. Atomiz Spr 1997;7(4):359–74.

58

Crapper GD, Dombrowski N, Pyott GAD. Kelvin-Helmholtz wave growth on cylindrical sheets. J Fluid Mech 1975;68(3):497–502.

59

Moon Y, Kim D, Yoon Y. Improved spray model for viscous annular sheets in a swirl injector. J Propuls Power 2010;26(2):267–79.

60

Sforzo BA, Kastengren AL, Matusik KE, et al. X-ray phase contrast imaging of liquid film and spray development inside an aircraft engine swirler. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2019;141(12):121003.

61

Lefebvre AH. Energy considerations in twin-fluid atomization. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1992;114(1):89–96.

62

Beck JE, Lefebvre AH, Koblish TR. Liquid sheet disintegration by impinging air streams. Atomiz Spr 1991;1(2):155–70.

63

Šikalo GEN. Phenomena of droplet–surface interactions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 2006;31(2):97–110.

64

Wang HY, McDonnell VG, Sowa WA, et al. Experimental study of a model gas turbine combustor swirl cup. Part Ⅰ - Two-phase characterization. J Propuls Power 1994;10(4):441–5.

65

Lefebvre AH, Ballal DR. Gas turbine combustion: Alternative fuels and emissions. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010.

66

Sanjosé M, Senoner JM, Jaegle F, et al. Fuel injection model for Euler-Euler and Euler-Lagrange large-eddy simulations of an evaporating spray inside an aeronautical combustor. Int J Multiph Flow 2011;37(5):514–29.

67

Choi CJ, Lee SY. Droplet formation from a thin hollow liquid jet with a core air flow. Atomiz Spr 2005;15(5):469–88.

68

Santolaya JL, Aísa LA, Calvo E, et al. Experimental study of near-field flow structure in hollow cone pressure swirl sprays. J Propuls Power 2007;23(2):382–9.

69

Wang XW, Huang Y, Liu YF, et al. An FV-EE model to predict lean blowout limits for gas turbine combustors with different structures and sprays. Chin J Aeronaut 2023;36(5):145–56.

70

Vignat G, Rajendram Soundararajan P, Durox D, et al. A joint experimental and large eddy simulation characterization of the liquid fuel spray in a swirl injector. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2021;143(8):081019.

71

Frohn A, Roth N. Dynamics of droplets. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2000.

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 124-143
Cite this article:
WANG D, HUANG Y, ZHANG H. Spray characteristics of different regions downstream of a swirl cup. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(8): 124-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.05.029

21

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 13 September 2023
Revised: 26 October 2023
Accepted: 18 December 2023
Published: 24 May 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return