AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Paper | Open Access

A light field measurement system through PSF estimation by a morphology-based method

Lingbao Kong ( )Panyu Zhou
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultra-precision Optical Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People’s Republic of China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Light field imaging technology can obtain three-dimensional (3D) information of a test surface in a single exposure. Traditional light field reconstruction algorithms not only take a long time to trace back to the original image, but also require the exact parameters of the light field system, such as the position and posture of a microlens array (MLA), which will cause errors in the reconstructed image if these parameters cannot be precisely obtained. This paper proposes a reconstruction algorithm for light field imaging based on the point spread function (PSF), which does not require prior knowledge of the system. The accurate PSF derivation process of a light field system is presented, and modeling and simulation were conducted to obtain the relationship between the spatial distribution characteristics and the PSF of the light field system. A morphology-based method is proposed to analyze the overlapping area of the subimages of light field images to identify the accurate spatial location of the MLA used in the system, which is thereafter used to accurately refocus light field imaging. A light field system is built to verify the algorithm’s effectiveness. Experimental results show that the measurement accuracy is increased over 41.0% compared with the traditional method by measuring a step standard. The accuracy of parameters is also improved through a microstructure measurement with a peak-to-valley value of 25.4% and root mean square value of 23.5% improvement. This further validates that the algorithm can effectively improve the refocusing efficiency and the accuracy of the light field imaging results with the superiority of refocusing light field imaging without prior knowledge of the system. The proposed method provides a new solution for fast and accurate 3D measurement based on a light field.

References

[1]
Ng R, Levoy M, Brédif M, Duval G, Horowitz M and Hanrahan P 2005 Light Field Photography with a Hand-Held Plenoptic Camera (Stanford: Stanford University) pp 1–11
[2]

Yang F F, Li H and Wu Y T 2019 High precision light field depth estimation based on epipolar plane image Optoelectron. Technol. 39 238–43

[3]

Levoy M, Ng R, Adams A, Footer M and Horowitz M 2006 Light field microscopy ACM Trans. Graph. 25 924–34

[4]

Levoy M, Zhang Z and Mcdowall I 2009 Recording and controlling the 4D light field in a microscope using microlens arrays J. Microsc. 235 144–62

[5]

Prevedel R et al 2014 Simultaneous whole-animal 3D imaging of neuronal activity using light-field microscopy Nat. Methods 11 727–30

[6]

Taylor M A, Nöbauer T, Pernia-Andrade A, Schlumm F and Vaziri A 2018 Brain-wide 3D light-field imaging of neuronal activity with speckle-enhanced resolution Optica 5 345–53

[7]

Cong L, Wang Z G, Chai Y M, Hang W, Shang C F, Yang W B, Bai L, Du J L, Wang K and Wen Q 2017 Rapid whole brain imaging of neural activity in freely behaving larval zebrafish Danio rerio eLife 6 e28158

[8]

Chen Y Q, Xiong B, Xue Y J, Jin X, Greene J and Tian L 2020 Design of a high-resolution light field miniscope for volumetric imaging in scattering tissue Biomed. Opt. Express 11 1662–78

[9]

Broxton M, Grosenick L, Yang S, Cohen N, Andalman A, Deisseroth K and Levoy M 2013 Wave optics theory and 3D deconvolution for the light field microscope Opt. Express 21 25418–39

[10]

He K, Wang X, Wang Z W, Yi H, Scherer N F, Katsaggelos A K and Cossairt O 2020 Snapshot multifocal light field microscopy Opt. Express 28 12108–20

[11]

Ayers G R and Dainty J C 1988 Iterative blind deconvolution method and its applications Opt. Lett. 13 547–9

[12]

Kong X L, Li Y T, Yuan X H, Yu Q Z, Zheng Z Y, Liang W X, Wang Z H, Wei Z Y and Zhang J 2006 Restoration of pinhole images using Lucy-Richardson algorithm Acta Phys. Sin. 55 2364–70

[13]

Levin A, Weiss Y, Durand F and Freeman W T 2011 Understanding blind deconvolution algorithms IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33 2354–67

[14]

Gu M T, Song X L, Zhang B, Tang Z Y and Xu C L 2019 Point spread function of microscopic light field imaging based on wave optics J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 45 1552–9

[15]
Georgiev T 2009 New results on the Plenoptic 2.0 camera Proc. 2009 Conf. Record of the 43rd Asilomar Conf. Signals, Systems and Computers (Pacific Grove, CA, USA) (IEEE) (https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2009.5469965)
[16]

Cherri A K and Karim M A 1989 Optical symbolic substitution: edge detection using Prewitt, Sobel, and Roberts operators Appl. Opt. 28 4644–8

[17]

Zhang J Y, Chen Y and Huang X X 2009 Edge detection of images based on improved sobel operator and genetic algorithms Proc. 2009 Int. Conf. Image Analysis and Signal Processing (IEEE) 32–5

[18]
Chaple G N, Daruwala R D and Gofane M S 2015 Comparisions of Robert, Prewitt, Sobel operator based edge detection methods for real time uses on FPGA Proc. 2015 Int. Conf. Technologies for Sustainable Development (Mumbai, India) (IEEE) (https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTSD.2015.7095920)
[19]

Zhou P Y, Kong L B, Sun X and Xu M 2020 Three-dimensional measurement of specular surfaces based on the light field IEEE Photonics J. 12 6901613

International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
Pages 045201-045201
Cite this article:
Kong L, Zhou P. A light field measurement system through PSF estimation by a morphology-based method. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 2021, 3(4): 045201. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ac1455

272

Views

2

Downloads

4

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 07 March 2021
Revised: 09 June 2021
Accepted: 13 July 2021
Published: 29 July 2021
© 2021 The Author(s).

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Return