AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1,023.9 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Adults have more male-biased sex ratios than first-winter juveniles in wintering duck populations

Kevin A. Wood ( )Kane BridesMaurice E. DurhamRichard D. Hearn
Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire, GL2 7BT, UK
Show Author Information

Abstract

Background

The long-term monitoring of demographic changes in waterbird populations remains limited, but such information can be valuable for conservationists and waterbird managers. Biased sex ratios can indicate differences in survival rates between sexes. In particular, differences in the sex ratios of fledged juveniles and adults can provide insight into the development of male bias among populations.

Methods

In this study, we used data from individual birds captured over a 57-year period to assess the extent, and temporal variability in male bias in nine populations of ducks wintering in the United Kingdom: Gadwall (Mareca strepera), Northern Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), Northern Pintail (Anas acuta), Common Pochard (Aythya ferina), Common Shelduck (Tadorna tadorna), Northern Shoveler (Spatula clypeata), Eurasian Teal (Anas crecca), Tufted Duck (Aythya fuligula), and Eurasian Wigeon (Mareca penelope).

Results

Overall, eight of these populations were significantly male-biased and adults were more male-biased than first-winter juveniles for all nine populations. The increased male bias among adults is consistent with the hypothesis that factors such as higher mortality of reproductive-age females during the breeding season is a major cause of male bias in duck populations. However, such predation cannot explain the male bias detected in first-winter juveniles in four of the populations. The temporal trends in male bias differed between adults and first-winter juveniles in Northern Mallard, Northern Pintail, Common Pochard, Common Shelduck, Eurasian Teal, Tufted Duck, and Eurasian Wigeon. Over the study period we found increased male bias among adult Northern Mallard, Northern Pintail, Common Pochard, Common Shelduck, and Tufted Duck as well as both adult and first-winter juvenile Northern Shoveler.

Conclusions

We provide evidence that among wintering duck populations, sex ratios are typically male-biased, with adults exhibiting stronger male-biased sex ratios than first-winter juveniles. Improved monitoring of sex ratios of wintering waterbirds would help to increase our understanding of changes in waterbird demography, population structure, and observed population trends; our study shows that birds caught during ringing projects can be a valuable source of such data.

References

 

Aebischer NJ. Fifty-year trends in UK hunting bags of birds and mammals, and calibrated estimation of national bag size, using GWCT's National Gamebag Census. Eur J Wildl Res. 2019;65: 64.

 

Albrecht T, Hořák D, Kreisinger J, Weidinger K, Klvaňa P, Michot TC. Factors determining pochard nest predation along a wetland gradient. J Wildlife Manag. 2006;70: 784–91.

 

Alexander WC. Differential sex distributions of wintering diving ducks (Aythyini) in North America. Am Birds. 1983;37: 26–9.

 

Arnold TW. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike's Information Criterion. J Wildlife Manag. 2010;74: 1175–8.

 
Bartoń K. MuMIn: Model selection and model averaging based on information criteria. R package version 1.13.4. 2012. https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn.
 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Software. 2015;67: 1–48.

 

Bellebaum J, Mädlow W. Survival explains sex ratio in an introduced Mandarin Duck Aix galericulata population. Ardea. 2015;103: 183–7.

 

Bellrose FC, Scott TG, Hawkins AS, Low JB. Sex ratios and age ratios in North American ducks. Ill Nat Hist Surv Bull. 1961;27: 391–486.

 

Blums P, Mednis A. Secondary sex ratio in Anatinae. Auk. 1996;113: 505–11.

 

Bolen EG. Sex ratios in the Black-bellied Tree Duck. J Wildlife Manag. 1970;34: 68–73.

 

Brides K, Wood KA, Hearn RD, Fijen TPM. Changes in the sex ratio of the Common Pochard Aythya ferina in Europe and North Africa. Wildfowl. 2017;67: 100–12.

 

Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Huyvaert KP. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011;65: 23–35.

 

Carbone C, Owen M. Differential migration of the sexes of Pochard Aythya ferina: results from a European survey. Wildfowl. 1995;46: 99–108.

 

Carney SM. Species, age and sex identification of ducks using wing plumage. Washington: US Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service; 1992.

 

Choudhury S, Black JM. Testing the behavioural dominance and dispersal hypothesis in Pochard. Ornis Scand. 1991;22: 155–9.

 

Christensen TK, Fox AD. Changes in age and sex ratios amongst samples of hunter-shot wings from common duck species in Denmark 1982–2010. Eur J Wildl Res. 2014;60: 303–12.

 

Clutton-Brock TH. Sex-ratio variation in birds. Ibis. 1986;128: 317–29.

 

Cooper N, Bond AL, Davis JL, Portela Miguez R, Tomsett L, Helgen KM. Sex biases in bird and mammal natural history collections. Proc R Soc B. 2019;286: 20192025.

 

Cox DR, Snell EJ. Analysis of binary data. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall; 1989.

20

Crawley MJ. Statistics: an introduction using R. Chichester: Wiley; 2005.

 

Dean WRJ, Skead DM. The sex ratio in Yellowbilled Duck, Redbilled Teal and Southern Pochard. Ostrich. 1977;48: 82–5.

 

Donald PF. Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations. Ibis. 2007;149: 671–92.

 

Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography. 2013;36: 27–46.

 

Eberhart-Phillips LJ, Küpper C, Carmona-Isunza MC, Vincze O, Zefania S, Cruz-López M, et al. Demographic causes of adult sex ratio variation and their consequences for parental cooperation. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 1651.

 

Evans DM, Day KR. Migration patterns and sex ratios of diving ducks wintering in Northern Ireland with specific reference to Lough Neagh. Ringing Migr. 2001;20: 358–63.

 

Fox AD, Cristensen TK. Could falling female sex ratios among first-winter northwest European duck populations contribute to skewed adult sex ratios and overall population declines? Ibis. 2018;160: 929–35.

 

Fox AD, King R, Watkin J. Seasonal variation in weight, body measurements and condition of free-living Teal. Bird Study. 1992;39: 53–62.

 

Frew RT, Brides K, Clare T, Maclean L, Rigby D, Tomlinson CT, et al. Temporal changes in the sex ratio of the Common Pochard Aythya ferina compared to four other duck species at Martin Mere, Lancashire, UK. Wildfowl. 2018;68: 140–54.

 

Guillemain M, Fox AD, Pöysä H, Väänänen V-M, Christensen TK, Triplet P, et al. Autumn survival inferred from wing age ratios: Wigeon juvenile survival half that of adults at best? J Ornithol. 2013;154: 351–8.

 

Hommel G. A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika. 1988;75: 383–6.

31

Johnson DH, Sargeant AB. Impact of red fox predation on the sex ratio of prairie mallards. Washington: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service; 1977.

 

Kear J, Hulme M. Ducks, geese and swans. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

 

Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr. Geographic variation and its climatic correlates in the sex ratio of eastern-wintering Dark-eyed Juncos (Junco hyemalis hyemalis). Ecology. 1976;57: 679–93.

 

Korschgen CE. Breeding stress of female eiders in Maine. J Wildl Manag. 1977;41: 360–73.

 

Lehikoinen A, Christensen TK, Öst M, Kilpi M, Saurola P, Vattulainen A. Large-scale change in the sex ratio of a declining eider Somateria mollissima population. Wildlife Biol. 2008a;14: 288–301.

 

Lehikoinen A, Öst M, Hollmén T, Kilpi M. Does sex-specific duckling mortality contribute to male bias in adult common eiders. Condor. 2008b;110: 574–8.

37

Leopold A. Game management. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press; 1933.

 

Madge S, Burn H. Wildfowl: an identification guide to the ducks, geese and swans of the world. London: Christopher Helm; 1988.

 

Mayr E. The sex ratio in wild birds. Am Nat. 1939;73: 156–79.

40

Metz KJ, Ankney CD. Are brightly coloured male ducks selectively shot by duck hunters? Can J Zool. 1991;69: 279–82.

 

Mitchell C, Ogilvie M. Fifty years of wildfowl ringing by The Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust. Wildfowl. 1996;47: 240–7.

 

Mitchell C, Fox AD, Harradine J, Clausager I. Measures of annual breeding success amongst Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope. Bird Study. 2008;55: 43–51.

 

Nagelkerke NJD. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika. 1991;78: 691–2.

 

Opermanis O, Mednis A, Bauga I. Duck nests and predators: interaction, specialisation and possible management. Wildlife Biol. 2001;7: 87–96.

 

Owen M, Cook WA. Variations in body weight, wing length and condition of Mallard Anas platvrhvnchos platyrhynchos and their relationship to environmental changes. J Zool. 1977;183: 377–95.

 

Owen M, Dix M. Sex ratios in some common British wintering ducks. Wildfowl. 1986;37: 104–12.

 

Owen M, Mitchell C. Movements and migrations of Wigeon Anas penelope wintering in Britain and Ireland. Bird Study. 1988;35: 47–59.

 

Owen M, Montgomery S. Body measurements of Mallard caught in Britain. Wildfowl. 1978;29: 123–34.

 

Perdeck AC, Cavé AJ. Sexual differences in migration and winter quarters of ducks ringed in the Netherlands. Wildfowl. 1983;34: 137–43.

 

Pöysä H, Linkola P, Paasivaara A. Breeding sex ratios in two declining diving duck species: between-year variation and changes over six decades. J Ornithol. 2019;160: 1015–23.

 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [3.6.3]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. http://www.R-project.org/.
 

Ramula S, Öst M, Lindén A, Karell P, Kilpi M. Increased male bias in eider ducks can be explained by sex-specific survival of prime-age breeders. PLoS One. 2018;13: e0195415.

 

Scott P. The decoy. Severn Wildfowl Trust Ann Rep. 1949;1: 57–61.

 

Sheldon BC. Recent studies of avian sex ratios. Heredity. 1998;80: 397–402.

 
Signorell A. DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.37. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/package=DescTools.
 

Sun YH, Bridgman CL, Wu HL, Lee CF, Liu M, Chiang PJ, et al. Sex ratio and survival of Mandarin Ducks in the Tachia River of central Taiwan. Waterbirds. 2011;34: 509–13.

 

Székely T, Weissing FJ, Komdeur J. Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution. J Evol Biol. 2014;27: 1500–12.

 

Thompson MC, DeLong RL. The use of cannon and rocket-projected nets for trapping shorebirds. Bird-Banding. 1967;38: 214–8.

 

Wainwright CB. How to make and use duck traps. Wildfowl. 1957;8: 44–7.

 

Wood KA, Ponting J, D'Costa N, Newth JL, Rose PE, Glazov P, et al. Understanding intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of aggressive behaviour in waterbird assemblages: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav. 2017;126: 209–16.

Avian Research
Article number: 51
Cite this article:
Wood KA, Brides K, Durham ME, et al. Adults have more male-biased sex ratios than first-winter juveniles in wintering duck populations. Avian Research, 2021, 12(1): 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-021-00286-1

718

Views

21

Downloads

5

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 27 May 2021
Accepted: 27 September 2021
Published: 05 October 2021
© The Author(s) 2021.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Return