AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Rock and Soil Mechanics Article
PDF (1.3 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Demands and challenges of large-scale salt cavern hydrogen storage in China

Chun-he YANG1,2, Gui-bin WANG1,2, Xi-lin SHI1,2, Shi-jie ZHU1,3, Zhu-yan ZHENG1,2, Wei LIU3, Jin-yang FAN3
State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Hydrogen is a low-carbon and clean energy source that can be produced from a wide range of sources, and the vigorous development of hydrogen energy industry is an important measure to achieve the dual-carbon goal and cope with the global energy transition. In the whole industry chain of "preparation–storage–transportation–application" of hydrogen energy, the difficulty of hydrogen storage has long been a constraint to the high-quality development of hydrogen energy industry. Salt cavern hydrogen storage has outstanding advantages such as low cost, large scale, high safety, and high hydrogen storage purity, which is an important development direction of large-scale hydrogen storage in the future, and also a major strategic demand during China's low-carbon energy transition. The current situations of hydrogen production industry and hydrogen energy consumption in China were comprehensively investigated, and the demand for salt cavern hydrogen storage in China was further analyzed. The technology and engineering status of using salt caverns to store natural gas and hydrogen in foreign countries were investigated, and the development and construction history of salt cavern storage in China were summarized. The similarities and differences of using salt caverns to store natural gas, helium, compressed air, and hydrogen were compared, and three major scientific and technological challenges that salt cavern hydrogen storage in Chin faces were proposed: hydrogen seepage and biochemical reaction in bedded salt rock, wellbore integrity control in salt cavern hydrogen storage, and pregnancy and prevention of disaster in hydrogen storage groups. The research results clearly define the rapid growth trend of hydrogen storage demand and the key research directions of large-scale salt cavern hydrogen storage in China.

Keywords

salt cavern hydrogen storagebedded salt rockhydrogen–rock reactionwellbore integritystorage group catastrophe

References

[1]
National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Board. Medium and long-term plan for the development of the hydrogen energy industry (2021―2035)[R]. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Board, 2022.
[2]
HU Jing, ZHANG Yi, ZHU Wen-ting, et al. China hydrogen energy industry insight and digital development report[R]. Beijing: Editorial Office of Process Indastry, Marketing Department of AVEVA Jianwei Soft Ware, 2023.
[3]

LIU Mu-zi, SHI Ke-ke, ZHAO Qiang, et al. Research progress of solid hydrogen storage materials[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2023, 42(9): 4746−4769.
Google Scholar
[4]
LUO Er-cang, LI Yan-zhong, QIU Li-min, et al. Research report on the development of hydrogen liquefaction, storage and transportation technologies and applications in China (2023) [R]. Beijing: Chinese Association of Refrigeration, 2023.
[5]

ZHANG Yuan-yuan, ZHAO Jing, LU Xi-lan, et al. Progress in liquid organic hydrogen storage materials[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35(9): 6.
Google Scholar
[6]

ZHENG Jin-yang, MA Kai, YE Sheng, et al. Development status and challenges of equipment for storage and transportation of high-pressure gaseous hydrogen in China[J]. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2022, 39(3):1−8.
Crossref Google Scholar
[7]

TACKIE-OTOO B N, HAQ M B. A comprehensive review on geo-storage of H2 in salt caverns: prospect and research advances[J]. Fuel, 2024, 356: 129609.
Crossref Google Scholar
[8]

CHEN Z, MA Z L, ZHENG J, et al. Perspectives and challenges of hydrogen storage in solid-state hydrides[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2021, 29: 1–12.
Crossref Google Scholar
[9]

TENG Yue, CHEN Guo-hong, WEI Jin-tao, et al. Research progress of hydrogen induced damage of the 6061-T6 alloy used as liner of type Ⅲ hydrogen storage cylinders[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 103−108.
Google Scholar
[10]

SU Hong-yan, HE Chun-hui, JIN Bi-hui, et al. Research on the key technology and standardization of 70 MPa on-board type Ⅳ hydrogen storage cylinder[J]. China Special Equipment Safety, 2023, 39(5): 1−8.
Crossref Google Scholar
[11]

LIU Ming-rui, DING Kai, WANG Wei, et al. Research progress of hydrogen storage materials based on physical adsorption[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2023, 12(6): 1804−1814.
Google Scholar
[12]

LIU Yun, JING Chao-jun, MA Ze-qun, et al. Research progress of new solid-state hydrogen storage materials[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2021, 49(9): 11−14+19.
Google Scholar
[13]

HAN Li, LI Qi, LENG Guo-yun, et al. Latest research progress of hydrogen energy storage technology[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(Suppl.1): 108−117.
Google Scholar
[14]

CHEN Xue-dong, FAN Zhi-chao, CHEN Yong-dong, et al. Technical progress in design, manufacture and maintenance of high-end pressure vessels in China[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(20): 18−33.
Crossref Google Scholar
[15]
ARMIJO J, BENNETT S, BIENASSIS T, et al. Global hydrogen review 2022[R]. Pairs: International Energy Agency, 2022.
[16]

SHI Xi-lin, MA Hong-ling, ZHANG Yu-hao. Advances of large-scale gas storage technology in existing caverns in high-insoluble salt formations[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 39(4): 55−65.
Google Scholar
[17]

JI Xu, ZHOU Bu-xiang, HE Ge, et al. Research review of key technology and application of large-scale water electrolysis powered by renewable energy to hydrogen and ammonia production[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2022, 54(5): 1−11.
Google Scholar
[18]

DU Zhong-ming, ZHENG Jin-yang, DAI Jian-feng, et al. Construction of green-hydrogen supply system in China: reflections and suggestions[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022, 24(6): 64−71.
Crossref Google Scholar
[19]
YUAN Li, ZHAO Meng-ni. Hydrogen energy series research ii: industry chain economy measurement and cost reduction outlook[R]. Suzhou: Soochow Securities, 2022.
[20]
HUANG Sheng, YANG Zhen-li, LI Zhen-yu. Path analysis of hydrogen industry chain development[J/OL]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, [2023−10−27], https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn.1000−6613. 2023−1497.
[21]
The National Energy Administration. Released the development of renewable energy in 2022 and introduced the progress of work related to improving the renewable energy green power certificate system, etc. [EB/OL]// The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. [2023-02-14]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2023-02/14/content_741481.htm.
[22]
China Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cell Industry Innovation Strategic Alliance. China hydrogen energy and fuel cell industry development report 2020[R]. Beijing: China Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cell Industry Innovation Strategic Alliance, 2020.
[23]
LI Ting, LIU Wei, WANG Zhe, et al. The key to a new era of green hydrogen energy: China’s renewable hydrogen 100 roadmap to 2030[R]. Beijing: Rocky Mountain Institute, China Hydrogen Alliance Research Institute, 2022.
[24]

XU Shuo, YU Bi-ying. Current development and prospect of hydrogen energy technology in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2021, 23(6): 1−12.
Google Scholar
[25]
ZENG Le, ZHENG Yuan-fang, ZHAO Jian-min. China hydrogen energy industry technology development insight report 2022[R]. Shanghai: Patsnap, Sci-Tech Daily, 2022.
[26]
WANG Yan-ming, XIONG Ya-lin, LIU Jian et al. China hydrogen energy and fuel cell industry white paper 2019[R]. Beijing: China Hydrogen Alliance, 2019.
[27]

CHEN Ji-qing, ZENG Chang-jing, ZHOU Yun-jiao, et al. Flow field structure optimization and performance improvement with pentagon baffle for proton exchange membrane fuel cell[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2023, 45(10): 1862−1875.
Google Scholar
[28]

TAN Xu-guang, CHEN Wen-miao, PAN Feng-wen. Fuel cell heavy-duty trucks: application and prospect[J]. Engineering, 2021, 7(6): 59−65.
Crossref Google Scholar
[29]
VENIER S, KANG M.J, MÜLLER F.J, et al. Global gas report 2022[R]. London: International Gas Union, 2022.
[30]
Anon. bp Statistical review of world energy 2022[R]. London: British Petroleum, 2022.
[31]
National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration. Notice on the opinions on accelerating the construction of gas storage facilities and improving the market mechanism for gas storage and peaking auxiliary services issued by two departments. [EB/OL]. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. [2018−04−26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku2018-12/31/content_5433966.htm.
[32]

WEI X X, BAN S N, SHI X U, et al. Carbon and energy storage in salt caverns under the background of carbon neutralization in China[J]. Energy, 2023, 272: 127120.
Crossref Google Scholar
[33]

PENG H H, FAN J Y, ZHANG X X, et al. Computed tomography analysis on cyclic fatigue and damage properties of rock salt under gas pressure[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2020, 134: 105523.
Crossref Google Scholar
[34]

KANG Yan-fei, CHEN Jie, JIANG De-yi, et al. Mesoscopic characteristics and mechanisms of microcracks healing in impurity-containing rock salt[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(Suppl.2): 30−38.
Google Scholar
[35]

LI Na-na, ZHAO Yan-qiang, WANG Tong-tao, et al. Trend observation: analysis of international strategic and technological development of salt cavern energy storage[J]. Proceedings of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(10): 1248−1252.
Google Scholar
[36]

HU Chao, FU Xing-hui, HE Hui, et al. Discussion on the development possibility of hydrogen storage in underground salt cavitiy[J]. China Well and Rock Salt, 2023, 54(2): 20−23.
Google Scholar
[37]

ZHANG Bo, LU Bo-lin, WU Yu-hang, et al. Development and trend of salt-cavern gas storage in domestic and abroad[J]. China Well and Rock Salt, 2021, 52(1): 21−24.
Google Scholar
[38]

BLANCO H, FAAIJ A. A review at the role of storage in energy systems with a focus on power to gas and long-term storage[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 81: 1049−1086.
Crossref Google Scholar
[39]

AMID A, MIGNARD D, WILKINSON M. Seasonal storage of hydrogen in a depleted natural gas reservoir[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(12): 5549−5558.
Crossref Google Scholar
[40]

BASNIEV K S, OMELCHENKO R, ADZYNOVA F A. Underground hydrogen storage problems in Russia[J]. Forschungszentrum Jülich Gmbh Zentralbibliothek, Verlag, 2010, 78(4): 506.
Google Scholar
[41]
PANFILOV M, GRAVIER G, FILLACIER S. Underground storage of H2 and H2-CO2-CH4 mixtures[C]//ECMOR X-10 th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. [S. l.] European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2006.
Crossref
[42]

TARKOWSKI R. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 105: 86−94.
Crossref Google Scholar
[43]
Anon. Assessment of the potential, the actors and relevant business cases for large scale and seasonal storage of renewable electricity by hydrogen underground storage in Europe-Overview on all known underground storage technologies for hydrogen[R]. Huesca: [s. n.], 2013.
[44]

LEMIEUX A, SHARP K, SHKARUPIN A. Preliminary assessment of underground hydrogen storage sites in Ontario, Canada[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(29): 15193−15204.
Crossref Google Scholar
[45]

LANKOF L, URBANCZYK K, TARKOWSKI R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 160: 112309.
Crossref Google Scholar
[46]

ŚLIZOWSKI J, LANKOF L, URBAŃCZYK K, et al. Potential capacity of gas storage caverns in rock salt bedded deposits in Poland[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 43: 167−178.
Crossref Google Scholar
[47]

SIMON J, FERRIZ A M, CORREAS L C. Hyunder–hydrogen underground storage at large scale: case study Spain[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 73: 136−144.
Crossref Google Scholar
[48]

LE DUIGOU A, BADER A G, LANOIX J C, et al. Relevance and costs of large scale underground hydrogen storage in France[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(36): 22987−23003.
Crossref Google Scholar
[49]

JUEZ-LARRÉ J, GONÇALVES MACHADO C, GROENENBERG R M, et al. A detailed comparative performance study of underground storage of natural gas and hydrogen in the Netherlands[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(74): 28843−28868.
Crossref Google Scholar
[50]

ZENG Da-qian, ZHANG Guang-quan, ZHANG Jun-fa, et al. Sinopec's UGS construction achievement and development prospect[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(9): 125−134.
Google Scholar
[51]

FANG Yan-li, HOU Zheng-meng, YUE Ye, et al. A new concept of multifunctional salt cavern hydrogen storage applied to the integration of hydrogen energy industry[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2022, 54(1): 128−135.
Google Scholar
[52]

BA Jin-hong, KANG Yan-peng, JIANG Hai-tao, et al. Present situation and prospect of the utilization of old cavity in domestic salt cavern gas storage[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2020, 39(7): 1−5+19.
Google Scholar
[53]

SHI Xi-lin, LI Yin-ping, YANG Chun-he, et al. Test study of influence of brine on tensile strength of muddy intercalation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(11): 2301−2308.
Google Scholar
[54]

SHI Xi-lin, LI Yin-ping, YANG Chun-he, et al. Research on mechanical mechanism of interlayer collapse in solution mining for salt cavern gas storage[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2009, 30(12): 3615−3620,3626.
Google Scholar
[55]

WEI X X, SHI X L, LI Y P, et al. Field experimental and theoretical research on creep shrinkage mechanism of ultra-deep energy storage salt cavern[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2023, 163: 105719.
Crossref Google Scholar
[56]

WEI X X, SHI X L, HU W, et al. Dynamic tightness evaluation of salt cavern energy storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 57: 106313.
Crossref Google Scholar
[57]

BAN Fan-sheng, YUAN Guang-jie, SHEN Rui-chen. Research on multi-interbed salt cavern shape control technology[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2010, 32(1): 362−364.
Google Scholar
[58]

YANG Chun-he, SHI Xi-lin, MA Hong-ling. Technology and application of salt cavern gas storage in complex salt formation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2018.
[59]

YANG Chun-he, ZHOU Hong-wei, LI Yin-ping. Disaster mechanism and protection of large salt cavern gas storage group[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
[60]

LI P, LI Y P, SHI X L, et al. Experimental and theoretical research on the debrining process in sediments for a gas storage salt cavern[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2023, 225: 211667.
Crossref Google Scholar
[61]

LI J L, ZHANG N, XU W J, et al. The influence of cavern length on deformation and barrier integrity around horizontal energy storage salt caverns[J]. Energy, 2022, 244: 123148.
Crossref Google Scholar
[62]

LI J L, YANG C H, SHI X L, et al. Construction modeling and shape prediction of horizontal salt caverns for gas/oil storage in bedded salt[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 190: 107058.
Crossref Google Scholar
[63]

LI J L, SHI X L, ZHANG S. Construction modeling and parameter optimization of multi-step horizontal energy storage salt caverns[J]. Energy, 2020, 203: 117840.
Crossref Google Scholar
[64]

TABKHI F, AZZARO-PANTEL C, PIBOULEAU L, et al. A mathematical framework for modelling and evaluating natural gas pipeline networks under hydrogen injection[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33: 6222–6231.
Crossref Google Scholar
[65]

CHEN Zhong-qi, ZHONG An, DAI Dong, et al. Effect of flow rate of shielding gas on distribution of particles in coaxial double-tube helium atmospheric pressure plasma jet[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(16): 288−300.
Crossref Google Scholar
[66]

ZHU S J, SHI X L, YANG C H, et al. Hydrogen loss of salt cavern hydrogen storage[J]. Renewable Energy, 2023, 218: 119267.
Crossref Google Scholar
[67]

LIU W, ZHANG Z X, CHEN J, et al. Feasibility evaluation of large-scale underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt rocks of China: a case study in Jiangsu province[J]. Energy, 2020, 198: 117348.
Crossref Google Scholar
[68]

LIU Jiang-feng, NI Hong-yang, PU Hai, et al. Test theory，method and device of gas permeability of porous media and the application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(1): 137−146.
Google Scholar
[69]

CHEN Xiang-sheng, LI Yin-ping, SHI Xi-lin et al. Development of a seepage and erosion device for cores in deep strata and experimental research[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(11): 2254−2262.
Google Scholar
[70]

GRGIC D, AL SAHYOUNI F, GOLFIER F, et al. Evolution of gas permeability of rock salt under different loading conditions and implications on the underground hydrogen storage in salt caverns[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(2): 691−714.
Crossref Google Scholar
[71]

ABUAISHA M, BILLIOTTE J. A discussion on hydrogen migration in rock salt for tight underground storage with an insight into a laboratory setup[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 38: 102589.
Crossref Google Scholar
[72]
TINNI A, FATHI E, AGARWAL R, et al. Shale permeability measurements on plugs and crushed samples [C]// SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference. [S. l.]: [s. n.], 2012.
Crossref
[73]

ZHANG D, SKOCZYLAS F, AGOSTINI F, et al. Experimental investigation of gas transfer properties and stress coupling effects of salt rocks[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(9): 4015−4029.
Crossref Google Scholar
[74]

BO Z, ZENG L, CHEN Y, et al. Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(38): 19998-20009.
Crossref Google Scholar
[75]

SCHWAB L, POPP D, NOWACK G, et al. Structural analysis of microbiomes from salt caverns used for underground gas storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(47): 20684−20694.
Crossref Google Scholar
[76]

DOPFFEL N, MAYERS K, KEDIR A, et al. Microbial hydrogen consumption leads to a significant pH increase under high-saline-conditions: implications for hydrogen storage in salt caverns[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 10564.
Crossref Google Scholar
[77]

HEMATPUR H, ABDOLLAHI R, ROSTAMI S, et al. Review of underground hydrogen storage: concepts and challenges[J]. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 7(2): 111−131.
Crossref Google Scholar
[78]

COARITA-TINTAYA E D, GOLFIER F, GRGIC D, et al. Hydromechanical modelling of salt caverns subjected to cyclic hydrogen injection and withdrawal[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2023, 162: 105690.
Crossref Google Scholar
[79]

DOPFFEL N, JANSEN S, GERRITSE J. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage-knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(12): 8594−8606.
Crossref Google Scholar
[80]

HE T, WANG T T, WANG D C, et al. Integrity analysis of wellbores in the bedded salt cavern for energy storage[J]. Energy, 2023, 263: 125841.
Crossref Google Scholar
[81]
RÉVEILLÈRE A, BÉREST P, EVANS J D. et al. SMRI research report RR2017−2: past salt caverns incidents database part 1: leakage, overfilling and blow-out[R]. New York: Solution Mining Research Institute, 2017.
[82]

LI X, MA X, ZHANG J, et al. Review of hydrogen embrittlement in metals: hydrogen diffusion, hydrogen characterization, hydrogen embrittlement mechanism and prevention[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica-English Letters, 2020, 33(6): 759−773.
Crossref Google Scholar
[83]

QI Wen-juan, SONG Ren-guo, QI Xing, et al. Hydrogen-induced additive stress and hydrogen embrittlement in 7050 aluminum alloy[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2015, 25(5): 1185−1192.
Google Scholar
[84]

XU Zheng-yi, ZHANG Peng-yuan, MENG Guo-zhe. Review of studies on metal hydrogen permeation[J]. Surface Technology, 2019, 48(11): 45−58.
Google Scholar
[85]

ZHU Yong-qiang, SONG Wei, LI Yu-xia, et al. Research progress on protection against hydrogen embrittlement of hydrogen-transport pipeline steels[J]. Surface Technology, 2022, 51(11): 126−137.
Google Scholar
[86]

ZHAO Xi, XING Yun-ying, WANG Xiu-yun, et al. Research status of compatibility of hydrogen-blended natural gas pipeline[J]. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(12): 22110125.
Google Scholar
[87]

DU X L, DAI X J, LI Z N, et al. Corrosion analysis and anti-corrosion measures of oil casing of sulfur content gas wells: a case study of Daniudi gas field in the Ordos Basin[J]. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 1280−1292.
Crossref Google Scholar
[88]

XIANG Yong, YUAN Yu, ZHOU Pei, et al. Metal corrosion in carbon capture, utilization, and storage: progress and challenges[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2023, 25(3): 197−208.
Crossref Google Scholar
[89]

UGARTE E R, SALEHI S. A review on well integrity issues for underground hydrogen storage[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology-Transactions of the ASME, 2022, 144(4): 042001.
Crossref Google Scholar
[90]

YOU X J, HU X, HE P P, et al. A review on the modelling of carbonation of hardened and fresh cement-based materials[J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2022, 125: 104315.
Crossref Google Scholar
[91]

QIAN Jue-zhi, YU Jin-cheng, SUN Hua-qiang, et al. Formation and function of ettringite in cement hydrates[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2017, 45(11): 1569−1581.
Google Scholar
[92]

HE T, WANG T T, XIE D Z, et al. The mechanism of pores enhancing the deformation of completion cement under confining pressure[J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2022, 125: 104322.
Crossref Google Scholar
[93]

HE T, WANG T T, ZHOU J, et al. Failure mode of cement sheath in salt cavern gas storge wellbore based on coupling plasticity and damage evolution[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2022, 160: 105272.
Crossref Google Scholar
[94]

CHEN Xiang-sheng, LI Yin-ping, SHI Xi-lin, et al. Analysis of leakage risks and prevention measures of underground salt cavern gas storage[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(Suppl.1): 367−373.
Google Scholar
[95]

YANG Chun-he, WANG Tong-tao. Advance in deep underground energy storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(9): 1729−1759.
Google Scholar
[96]

DONG Z K, LI Y P, LI H R, et al. Experimental study on the influence of temperature on rock salt creep[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2023, 56(5), 3499−3518.
Crossref Google Scholar
[97]

DONG Z K, LI Y P, LI H R, et al. Influence of loading history on creep behavior of rock salt[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 55: 105434.
Crossref Google Scholar
[98]

LI Yin-ping, SHI Xi-lin, YANG Chun-he. Solution mining control and safety evaluation of salt cavern gas storage [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.
[99]

MA Lin-jian, LIU Xin-yu, XU Hong-fa, et al. Stability analysis of salt rock gas storage cavern under uncontrolled blowout[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011, 32(9): 2791−2797.
Google Scholar
[100]

LI H, MA H L, YANG C H, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of rock salt under multi-stage cyclic loading[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2023, 176: 107911.
Crossref Google Scholar
[101]

ZHAO K, MA H L, YANG C H, et al. Damage evolution and deformation of rock salt under creep-fatigue loading[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2021, 54(4): 1985−1997.
Crossref Google Scholar
[102]

FAN Jin-yang, TANG Lu-xuan, CHEN Jie, et al. Creep fatique constitutive model of salt rock based on a hardening parameter[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(5): 1271−1282.
Google Scholar
[103]

LI Z Z, SUO J J, FAN J Y, et al. Damage evolution of rock salt under multilevel amplitude creep–fatigue loading with acoustic emission monitoring[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2023, 164: 105346.
Crossref Google Scholar
[104]

ZHAO K, MA H L, YANG C H, et al. The role of prior creep duration on the acoustic emission characteristics of rock salt under cyclic loading[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2022, 157: 105166.
Crossref Google Scholar
[105]

HEINEMANN N, ALCALDE J, MIOCIC J M, et al. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media–the scientific challenges[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(2): 853−864.
Crossref Google Scholar
[106]

REITENBACH V, GANZER L, ALBRECHT D, et al. Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: a review of key issues[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(11): 6927−6937.
Crossref Google Scholar
[107]

MA H L, YANG C H, LI Y P, et al. Stability evaluation of the underground gas storage in rock salts based on new partitions of the surrounding rock[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73: 6911–6925.
Crossref Google Scholar
[108]

YU H B, LIU Y M, MA H L, et al. Pillar safety in shallow salt caverns by using numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 55: 105881.
Crossref Google Scholar
[109]

MA H L, WEI X X, SHI X L, et al. Evaluation methods of salt pillar stability of salt cavern energy storage[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(20): 7570.
Crossref Google Scholar
[110]
EHGARTNER B, PARK B. Allowable pillar to diameter ratio for strategic petroleum reserve caverns[C]// California, San Francisco: 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. [S. l.]: [s. n.], 2011.
Crossref
[111]

WANG T T, YANG C H, YAN X Z, et al. Allowable pillar width for bedded rock salt caverns gas storage[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 127: 433−444.
Crossref Google Scholar
[112]

LI D P, LIU W, FU P, et al. Stability evaluation of salt cavern hydrogen storage and optimization of operating parameters under high frequency injection production[J]. Gas Science and Engineering, 2023, 119: 205119.
Crossref Google Scholar
[113]

YIN Xue-ying, YANG Chun-he, CHEN Jian-wen. Numerical simulation research on long-term stability of gas storage in Jintan Salt Mine[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(6): 869−874.
Google Scholar
[114]

CHEN X S, LI Y P, SHI Y F, et al. Tightness and stability evaluation of salt cavern underground storage with a new fluid-solid coupling seepage model[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 202: 108475.
Crossref Google Scholar
[115]

SONG Y J, SONG R, LIU J J. Hydrogen tightness evaluation in bedded salt rock cavern: a case study of Jintan, China[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(78): 30489−30506.
Crossref Google Scholar
[116]

BOETTCHER N, GOERKE U J, KOLDITZ O, et al. Thermo-mechanical investigation of salt caverns for short-term hydrogen storage[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(3): 98.
Crossref Google Scholar
[117]

LIU X, SHI X L, LI Y P, et al. Maximum gas production rate for salt cavern gas storages[J]. Energy, 2021, 234: 121211.
Crossref Google Scholar
[118]

LI Wen-jing, JIANG Yuan, SHAN Bao-dong, et al. Time-temperature effect on cavity stability during gas injection and production in gas storage with salt caves[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(6): 762−776.
Google Scholar
[119]

WANG T T, YANG C H, MA H L, et al. Safety evaluation of gas storage caverns located close to a tectonic fault[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23: 281−293.
Crossref Google Scholar
Rock and Soil Mechanics
Volume 45 Issue 1,
January 2024
Pages 1-19
DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.6785
Cite this article:
YANG C-h, WANG G-b, SHI X-l, et al. Demands and challenges of large-scale salt cavern hydrogen storage in China. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2023.6785

509

Views

99

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 06 November 2023
Accepted: 11 December 2023
Published: 17 January 2024
© 2024 Rock and Soil Mechanics
Return