AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Dynamic Performance Prediction in Batch-Based Assembly System with Bernoulli Machines and Changeovers

State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Decision of Complex Systems, School of Automation, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo 192-0982, Japan
Show Author Information

Abstract

Worldwide competition and diverse demand of customers pose great challenges to manufacturing enterprises. How to organize production to achieve high productivity and low cost becomes their primary task. In the mean time, the rapid pace of technology innovation has contributed to the development of new types of flexible automation. Hence, increasing manufacturing enterprises convert to multi-product and small-batch production, a manufacturing strategy that brings increased output, reduced costs, and quick response to the market. A distinctive feature of small-batch production is that the system operates mainly in the transient states. Transient states may have a significant impact on manufacturing systems. It is therefore necessary to estimate the dynamic performance of systems. As the assembly system is a typical class of production systems, in this paper, we focus on the problem of dynamic performance prediction of the assembly systems that produce small batches of different types of products. And the system is assumed to be characterized with Bernoulli reliability machines, finite buffers, and changeovers. A mathematical model based on Markovian analysis is first derived and then, the analytical formulas for performance evaluation of three-machine assembly systems are given. Moreover, a novel approach based on decomposition and aggregation is proposed to predict dynamic performance of large-scale assembly systems that consist of multiple component lines and additional processing machines located downstream of the assemble machine. The proposed approach is validated to be highly accurate and computationally efficient when compared to Monte Carlo simulation.

References

1

S. N. U. A. Kirmani, Performance modeling of automated manufacturing systems, Technometrics, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 456, 1993.

2
G. Liberopoulos, C. T. Papadopoulos, B. Tan, J. M. Smith, and S. B. Gershwin, Stochastic Modeling of Manufacturing Systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006.
3
H. T. Papadopolous, C. Heavey, and J. Browne, Queueing Theory in Manufacturing Systems Analysis and Design. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
4
R. G. Askin and C. R. Standridge, Modeling and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, 1993.
5
K. Hitomi, Manufacturing Systems Engineering: A Unified Approach to Manufacturing Technology, Productionmanagement, and Industrial Economics. London, UK: Routledge, 2017.
6
J. Li and S. M. Meerkov, Production Systems Engineering. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2008.
7

U. N. Bhat, Finite capacity assembly-like queues, Queueing Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–101, 1986.

8

E. H. Lipper and B. Sengupta, Assembly-like queues with finite capacity: Bounds, asymptotics and approximations, Queueing Systems, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 67–83, 1986.

9

P. C. Rao and R. Suri, Approximate queueing network models for closed fabrication/assembly systems. Part I: Single level systems, Production and Operations Management, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 244–275, 1994.

10

P. C. Rao and R. Suri, Performance analysis of an assembly station with input from multiple fabrication lines, Production and Operations Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 283–302, 2000.

11

M. Manitz, Queueing-model based analysis of assembly lines with finite buffers and general service times, Computers &Operations Research, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 2520–2536, 2008.

12

M. Manitz, Analysis of assembly/disassembly queueing networks with blocking after service and general service times, Annals of Operations Research, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 417–441, 2015.

13

S. Lagershausen, M. Manitz, and H. Tempelmeier, Performance analysis of closed-loop assembly lines with general processing times and finite buffer spaces, IIE Transactions, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 502–515, 2013.

14

S. B. Gershwin, An efficient decomposition method for the approximate evaluation of tandem queues with finite storage space and blocking, Operations Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 291–305, 1987.

15

X. G. Liu and J. A. Buzacott, Approximate models of assembly systems with finite inventory banks, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 45, nos. 2&3, pp. 143–154, 1990.

16

S. B. Gershwin, Assembly/disassembly systems: An efficient decomposition algorithm for tree-structured networks, IIE Transactions, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 302–314, 1991.

17

S. B. Gershwin and M. H. Burman, A decomposition method for analyzing inhomogeneous assembly/disassembly systems, Annals of Operations Research, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 91–115, 2000.

18

M. D. Mascolo, R. David, and Y. Dallery, Modeling and analysis of assembly systems with unreliable machines and finite buffers, IIE transactions, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 315–330, 1991.

19

N. Nahas, M. Nourelfath, and M. Gendreau, Selecting machines and buffers in unreliable assembly/disassembly manufacturing networks, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 154, pp. 113–126, 2014.

20

S. Y. Chiang, C. T. Kuo, J. T. Lim, and S. M. Meerkov, Improvability of assembly systems Ⅰ: Problem formulation and performance evaluation, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 321–357, 2000.

21

S. Y. Chiang, C. T. Kuo, J. T. Lim, and S. Meerkov, Improvability of assembly systems Ⅱ: Improvability indicators and case study, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 359–393, 2000.

22

F. Ju, J. Li, and W. Deng, Selective assembly system with unreliable Bernoulli machines and finite buffers, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 171–184, 2016.

23

J. -Q. Wang, F. -Y. Yan, P. -H. Cui, and C. -B. Yan, Bernoulli serial lines with batching machines: Performance analysis and system-theoretic properties, IISE Transactions, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 729–743, 2019.

24

S. M. Meerkov and L. Zhang, Transient behavior of serial production lines with Bernoulli machines, IIE Transactions, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 297–312, 2008.

25

L. Zhang, C. Wang, J. Arinez, and S. Biller, Transient analysis of Bernoulli serial lines: Performance evaluation and system-theoretic properties, IIE Transactions, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 528–543, 2013.

26

Y. Kang, H. Yan, and F. Ju, Performance evaluation of production systems using real-time machine degradation signals, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 273–283, 2019.

27
Z. Jia, L. Zhang, G. Chen, J. Arinez, and G. Xiao, Performance evaluation in finite production run-based serial lines with geometric machines, in Proc. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2016, pp. 450–455.
28

Z. Jia and L. Zhang, Serial production lines with geometric machines and finite production runs: Performance analysis and system-theoretic properties, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2247–2262, 2019.

29

F. Ju, J. Li, and J. A. Horst, Transient analysis of serial production lines with perishable products: Bernoulli reliability model, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 694–707, 2016.

30

N. Kang, F. Ju, and L. Zheng, Transient analysis of geometric serial lines with perishable intermediate products, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 149–156, 2016.

31

F. Wang, F. Ju, and N. Kang, Transient analysis and real-time control of geometric serial lines with residence time constraints, IISE Transactions, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 709–728, 2019.

32

J. Tu, Y. Bai, M. Yang, L. Zhang, and P. Denno, Real-time bottleneck in serial production lines with Bernoulli machines: Theory and case study, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1822–1834, 2020.

33

J. Tu and L. Zhang, Performance analysis and optimization of Bernoulli serial production lines with dynamic real-time bottleneck identification and mitigation, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 60, no. 13, pp. 3989–4005, 2022.

34

Z. Jia, L. Zhang, J. Arinez, and G. Xiao, Performance analysis of assembly systems with Bernoulli machines and finite buffers during transients, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1018–1032, 2015.

35

Z. Jia, K. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Y. Dai, and C. Liu, Real-time performance evaluation and improvement of assembly systems with Bernoulli machines and finite production runs, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 5749–5766, 2019.

36

Z. Jia, L. Zhang, J. Arinez, and G. Xiao, Finite production run-based serial lines with Bernoulli machines: Performance analysis, bottleneck, and case study, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 134–148, 2015.

37

Z. Jia, J. Chen, and Y. Dai, Decomposition and aggregation-based real-time analysis of assembly systems with geometric machines and small batch-based production tasks, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 988–999, 2020.

38

Y. Hou, L. Li, Y. Ge, K. Zhang, and Y. Li, A new modeling method for both transient and steady-state analyses of inhomogeneous assembly systems, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 49, pp. 46–60, 2018.

Complex System Modeling and Simulation
Pages 224-237
Cite this article:
Wang Z, Jia Z, Tian X, et al. Dynamic Performance Prediction in Batch-Based Assembly System with Bernoulli Machines and Changeovers. Complex System Modeling and Simulation, 2022, 2(3): 224-237. https://doi.org/10.23919/CSMS.2022.0015

786

Views

23

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 07 May 2022
Revised: 24 June 2022
Accepted: 22 July 2022
Published: 30 September 2022
© The author(s) 2022

The articles published in this open access journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return