AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home iEnergy Article
PDF (564.7 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Letter | Open Access

Secondary control fusion in inverter intensive dynamic microgrids for distribution system resiliency enhancement

Yuxi MenLizhi DingJunhui ZhangXiaonan Lu( )
School of Engineering Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Microgrids (MGs) dominated by power electronics interface inverters can augment distribution system resiliency. The interactions among neighboring MGs and the requirements for flexible system network reconfiguration motivate the development of dynamic MGs. To improve the distribution system resiliency in the context of dynamic MGs, this paper proposes the concept of functional fusion of secondary control levels across neighboring dynamic MGs with the integration of multiple compensation terms into the secondary controller in each distributed generator (DG). Moreover, two kinds of consensus-based algorithms with the consideration of communication delays are encompassed to calculate the average values of static and dynamic variables and thereby build an effective communications network among DGs in dynamic MGs. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed secondary controller is validated using a 9-bus test distribution feeder.

References

[1]

Guerrero, J. M., Vasquez, J. C., Matas, J., de Vicuna, L. G., Castilla, M. (2011). Hierarchical control of droop-controlled AC and DC microgrids-A general approach toward standardization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58: 158–172.

[2]

Chen, B., Wang, J. H., Lu, X. N., Chen, C., Zhao, S. J. (2021). Networked microgrids for grid resilience, robustness, and efficiency: A review. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12: 18–32.

[3]

Li, Z. Y., Shahidehpour, M., Aminifar, F., Alabdulwahab, A., Al-Turki, Y. (2017). Networked microgrids for enhancing the power system resilience. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105: 1289–1310.

[4]

Nassar, M. E., Salama, M. M. A. (2016). Adaptive self-adequate microgrids using dynamic boundaries. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7: 105–113.

[5]

Du, Y. H., Lu, X. N., Wang, J. H., Lukic, S. (2019). Distributed secondary control strategy for microgrid operation with dynamic boundaries. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10: 5269–5282.

[6]

Simpson-Porco, J. W., Shafiee, Q., Dorfler, F., Vasquez, J. C., Guerrero, J. M., Bullo, F. (2015). Secondary frequency and voltage control of islanded microgrids via distributed averaging. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62: 7025–7038.

[7]

Cheng, Z. Y., Duan, J., Chow, M.-Y. (2018). To centralize or to distribute: That is the question: A comparison of advanced microgrid management systems. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 12: 6–24.

[8]

Du, Y. H., Tu, H., Yu, H., Lukic, S. (2020). Accurate consensus-based distributed averaging with variable time delay in support of distributed secondary control algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11: 2918–2928.

[9]
Du, Y. H., Lu, X. N., Chen, B., Liu, J. Z., Wang, X. F., Blaabjerg, F. (2020). Distributed average observation in inverter dominated dynamic microgrids. In: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Detroit, MI, USA.
[10]

Khayat, Y., Shafiee, Q., Heydari, R., Naderi, M., Dragicevic, T., Simpson-Porco, J. W., Dorfler, F., Fathi, M., Blaabjerg, F., Guerrero, J. M., et al. (2020). On the secondary control architectures of AC microgrids: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 35: 6482–6500.

[11]

Ahmed, K., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Mekhilef, S., M. Mubarak, N., Stojcevski, A. (2021). A review on primary and secondary controls of inverter-interfaced microgrid. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 9: 969–985.

[12]

Bidram, A., Poudel, B., Damodaran, L., Fierro, R., Guerrero, J. M. (2020). Resilient and cybersecure distributed control of inverter-based islanded microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16: 3881–3894.

[13]

Yang, Q. F., Zhou, J. Y., Chen, X., Wen, J. Y. (2021). Distributed MPC-based secondary control for energy storage systems in a DC microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36: 5633–5644.

[14]

Ding, L., Han, Q. L., Zhang, X. M. (2019). Distributed secondary control for active power sharing and frequency regulation in islanded microgrids using an event-triggered communication mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15: 3910–3922.

[15]

Chen, Y. L., Qi, D. L., Dong, H. N., Li, C. Y., Li, Z. M., Zhang, J. L. (2021). A FDI attack-resilient distributed secondary control strategy for islanded microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12: 1929–1938.

[16]

Atay, F. M. (2010). Consensus in networks under transmission delays and the normalized Laplacian. IFAC Proceedings, 43: 277–282.

iEnergy
Pages 9-13
Cite this article:
Men Y, Ding L, Zhang J, et al. Secondary control fusion in inverter intensive dynamic microgrids for distribution system resiliency enhancement. iEnergy, 2023, 2(1): 9-13. https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2023.0011

429

Views

19

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 14 February 2023
Revised: 08 April 2023
Accepted: 16 April 2023
Published: 01 March 2023
© The author(s) 2023.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Return