AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Energy Material Advances Article
PDF (14 MB)
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Constructing Br-Doped Li10SnP2S12-Based All-Solid-State Batteries with Superior Performances

Qiyue Luo1,2,†, Liang Ming1,2,†, Dong Zhang3, Chaochao Wei1, Zhongkai Wu1, Ziling Jiang1, Chen Liu1( ), Shiyu Liu4, Kecheng Cao3( ), Long Zhang5, Chuang Yu1( ), Shijie Cheng1
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
School of Physical Science and Technology & Shanghai Key Laboratory of High-resolution Electron Microscopy, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai 201210, P. R. China
Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
College of Physics and Energy, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, P. R. China

†These author contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Ionic conductivity and electro/chemical compatibility of Li10SnP2S12 electrolytes play crucial roles in achieving superior electrochemical performances of the corresponding solid-state batteries. However, the relatively low Li-ion conductivity and poor stability of Li10SnP2S12 toward high-voltage layered oxide cathodes limit its applications. Here, a Br-substituted strategy has been applied to promote Li-ion conductivity. The optimal composition of Li9.9SnP2S11.9Br0.1 delivers high conductivity up to 6.0 mS cm−1. 7Li static spin-lattice relaxation (T1) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and density functional theory simulation are combined to unravel the improvement of Li-ion diffusion mechanism for the modified electrolytes. To mitigate the interfacial stability between the Li9.9SnP2S11.9Br0.1 electrolyte and the bare LiNi0.7Co0.1Mn0.2O2 cathode, introducing Li2ZrO3 coating layer and Li3InCl6 isolating layer strategies has been employed to fabricate all-solid-state lithium batteries with excellent electrochemical performances. The Li3InCl6-LiNi0.7Co0.1Mn0.2O2/Li3InCl6/Li9.9SnP2S11.9Br0.1/Li-In battery delivers much higher discharge capacities and fast capacity degradations at different charge/discharge C rates, while the Li2ZrO3@LiNi0.7Co0.1Mn0.2O2/Li9.9SnP2S11.9Br0.1/Li-In battery shows slightly lower discharge capacities at the same C rates and superior cycling performances. Multiple characterization methods are conducted to reveal the differences of battery performance. The poor electrochemical performance of the latter battery configuration is associated with the interfacial instability between the Li3InCl6 electrolyte and the Li9.9SnP2S11.9Br0.1 electrolyte. This work offers an effective strategy to constructing Li10SnP2S12-based all-solid-state lithium batteries with high capacities and superior cyclabilities.

References

1

Yu C, Zhao F, Luo J, Zhang L, Sun X. Recent development of lithium argyrodite solid-state electrolytes for solid-state batteries: Synthesis, structure, stability and dynamics. Nano Energy. 2021;83:Article 105858.
Crossref Google Scholar
2

Yu C, Ganapathy S, Eck E, Wang H, Basak S, Li Z, Wagemaker M. Accessing the bottleneck in all-solid state batteries, lithium-ion transport over the solid-electrolyte-electrode interface. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1086.
Crossref Google Scholar
3

Wei C, Liu X, Yu C, Chen S, Chen S, Cheng S, Xie J. Revealing performance of 78Li2S-22P2S5 glass ceramic based solid-state batteries at different operating temperatures. Chin Chem Lett. 2022;34(7):Article 107859.
Crossref Google Scholar
4

Wei C, Yu C, Wang R, Peng L, Chen S, Miao X, Cheng S, Xie J. Sb and O dual doping of chlorine-rich lithium argyrodite to improve air stability and lithium compatibility for all-solid-state batteries. J Power Sources. 2023;559:Article 232659.
Crossref Google Scholar
5

Guo Q, Xu F, Shen L, Deng S, Wang Z, Li M, Yao X. 20 μm-thick Li6.4La3Zr1.4Ta0.6O12-based flexible solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Mat Adv. 2022;2022:Article 9753506.
Crossref Google Scholar
6

Zhao W, Zhang K, Wu F, Wang X, Guo R, Zhang K, Yuan Y, Bai Y, Wu C. Moisture-assistant chlorinated separator with dual-protective interface for ultralong-life and high-rate lithium metal batteries. Chem Eng J. 2023;453:Article 139348.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

Chen SJ, Xie DJ, Liu GZ, Mwizerwa JP, Zhang Q, Zhao YR, Xu XX, Yao XY. Sulfide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries: Structure, conductivity, stability and application. Energy Storage Mater. 2018;14:58–74.
Crossref Google Scholar
8

Liao C, Yu C, Peng L, Miao X, Chen S, Zhang Z, Cheng S, Xie J. Achieving superior ionic conductivity of Li6PS5I via introducing LiCl. Solid State Ionics. 2022;377:Article 115871.
Crossref Google Scholar
9

Wu Z, Chen S, Yu C, Wei C, Peng L, Wang H-L, Cheng S, Xie J. Engineering high conductive Li7P2S8I via Cl- doping for all-solid-state Li-S batteries workable at different operating temperatures. Chem Eng J. 2022;442:Article 136346.
Crossref Google Scholar
10

Rudola A, Wright CJ, Barker J. Reviewing the safe shipping of lithium-ion and sodium-ion cells: A materials chemistry perspective. Energy Mater Adv. 2021;2021:9798460.
Crossref Google Scholar
11

Yang M, Chen L, Li H, Wu F. Air/water stability problems and solutions for lithium batteries. Energy material. Energy Mater Adv. 2022;2022.
Crossref Google Scholar
12

Gao H, Grundish NS, Zhao Y, Zhou A, Goodenough JB. Formation of stable interphase of polymer-in-salt electrolyte in all-solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Mater Adv. 2021;2021:1932952.
Crossref Google Scholar
13

Liao C, Yu C, Miao X, Chen S, Peng L, Wei C, Wu Z, Cheng S, Xie J. Synthesis of Br-rich argyrodite electrolytes enables all-solid-state batteries with superior battery performances at different operating temperatures. Materialia. 2022;26:Article 101603.
Crossref Google Scholar
14

Lou S, Yu Z, Liu Q, Wang H, Chen M, Wang J. Multi-scale imaging of solid-state battery interfaces: From atomic scale to macroscopic scale. Chem. 2020;6(9):2199–2218.
Crossref Google Scholar
15

Lou S, Zhang F, Fu C, Chen M, Ma Y, Yin G, Wang J. Interface issues and challenges in all-solid-state batteries: Lithium, sodium, and beyond. Adv Mater. 2021;33(6): e2000721.
Crossref Google Scholar
16

Chen S, Yu C, Wei C, Jiang Z, Zhang Z, Peng L, Cheng S, Xie J. Unraveling electrochemical stability and reversible redox of Y-doped Li2ZrCl6 solid electrolytes. Energy Mater Adv. 2023;4:0019.
Crossref Google Scholar
17

Wei C, Yu C, Chen S, Chen S, Peng L, Wu Y, Li S, Cheng S, Xie J. Unraveling the LiNbO3 coating layer on battery performances of lithium argyrodite-based all-solid-state batteries under different cut-off voltages. Electrochim Acta. 2023;438:Article 141545.
Crossref Google Scholar
18

Guo R, Zhang K, Zhao W, Hu Z, Li S, Zhong Y, Yang R, Wang X, Wang J, Wu C, et al. Interfacial challenges and strategies toward practical sulfide-based solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Mater Adv. 2023;4:0022.
Crossref Google Scholar
19

Zhang K, Wu F, Wang X, Zheng L, Yang X, Zhao H, Sun Y, Zhao W, Bai Y, Wu C. An ion-dipole-reinforced polyether electrolyte with ion-solvation cages enabling high–voltage-tolerant and ion-conductive solid-state lithium metal batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;32(5):2107764.
Crossref Google Scholar
20

Wu Z, Wang R, Yu C, Wei C, Chen S, Liao C, Cheng S, Xie J. Origin of the high conductivity of the LiI-doped Li3PS4 electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium–sulfur batteries working in wide temperature ranges. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2022;62(1):96–104.
Crossref Google Scholar
21

Liao C, Yu C, Chen S, Wei C, Miao X, Cheng S, Xie J. Hunting highly conductive Li6PS5I electrolyte via Sn-cl dual doping for solid-state batteries. Scr Mater. 2023;226(44):Article 115219.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

Liang J, Li X, Wang C, Kim JT, Yang R, Wang J, Sun X. Current status and future directions in environmental stability of sulfide solid-state electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. Energy Mater Adv. 2023;4:0021.
Crossref Google Scholar
23

Kamaya N, Homma K, Yamakawa Y, Hirayama M, Kanno R, Yonemura M, Kamiyama T, Kato Y, Hama S, Kawamoto K, et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat Mater. 2011;10(9):682–686.
Crossref Google Scholar
24

Gao J, Sun X, Wang C, Zhang Y, Yang L, Song D, Wu Y, Yang Z, Ohsaka T, Matsumotoc F, et al. Sb- and O-cosubstituted Li10SnP2S12 with high electrochemical and air stability for all-solid-state lithium batteries. ChemElectroChem. 2022;9(12):202200156.
Crossref Google Scholar
25

Jiang Z, Li Z, Wang X, Gu C, Xia X, Tu J. Robust Li6PS5I interlayer to stabilize the tailored electrolyte Li9.95SnP2S11.95F0.05/Li metal Interface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(26):30739–30745.
Crossref Google Scholar
26

Yi J, Chen L, Liu Y, Geng H, Fan LZ. High capacity and superior cyclic performances of all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries enabled by a high-conductivity Li10SnP2S12 solid electrolyte. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(40):36774–36781.
Crossref Google Scholar
27

Bron P, Johansson S, Zick K, der Gunne JSa, Dehnen S, Roling B. Li10SnP2S12: An affordable lithium superionic conductor. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(42):15694–15697.
Crossref Google Scholar
28

Xu Y-H, Zhang Q-F, Fan B, Xue B, Chen H-J, Zhang X-H, Luo Z-K, Wang F, Le Coq D, Calvez L, et al. An extremely high rate Li–S battery with hybrid electrolyte. J Alloys Compd. 2020;845:156261.
Crossref Google Scholar
29

Tarhouchi I, Viallet V, Vinatier P, Ménétrier M. Electrochemical characterization of Li10SnP2S12: An electrolyte or a negative electrode for solid state Li-ion batteries? Solid State Ionics. 2016;296:18–25.
Crossref Google Scholar
30

Sun Y, Suzuki K, Hori S, Hirayama M, Kanno R. Superionic conductors: Li10+δ[SnySi1–y]1+δP2−δS12 with a Li10GeP2S12-type structure in the Li3PS4–Li4SnS4–Li4SiS4 quasi-ternary system. Chem Mater. 2017;29(14):5858–5864.
Crossref Google Scholar
31

Wang Q, Liu D, Ma X, Zhou X, Lei Z. Cl-doped Li10SnP2S12 with enhanced ionic conductivity and lower Li-ion migration barrier. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022;14(19):22225–22232.
Crossref Google Scholar
32

Peng L, Yu C, Zhang Z, Ren H, Zhang J, He Z, Yu M, Zhang L, Cheng S, Xie J. Chlorine-rich lithium argyrodite enabling solid-state batteries with capabilities of high voltage, high rate, low-temperature and ultralong cyclability. Chem Eng J. 2022;430:132896.
Crossref Google Scholar
33

Li X, Jiang Z, Cai D, Wang X, Xia X, Gu C, Tu J. Single-crystal-layered Ni-rich oxide modified by phosphate coating boosting interfacial stability of Li10SnP2S12-based all-solid-state Li batteries. Small. 2021;17(47): e2103830.
Crossref Google Scholar
34

Vinado C, Wang S, He Y, Xiao X, Li Y, Wang C, Yang J. Electrochemical and interfacial behavior of all solid state batteries using Li10SnP2S12 solid electrolyte. J Power Sources. 2018;396:824–830.
Crossref Google Scholar
35

Mo Y, Ong SP, Ceder G. First principles study of the Li10GeP2S12 lithium super ionic conductor material. Chem Mater. 2011;24(1):15–17.
Crossref Google Scholar
36

Tan DHS, Wu EA, Nguyen H, Chen Z, Marple MAT, Doux J-M, Wang X, Yang H, Banerjee A, Meng YS. Elucidating reversible electrochemical redox of Li6PS5Cl solid electrolyte. ACS Energy Lett. 2019;4(10):2418–2427.
Crossref Google Scholar
37

Luo Q, Yu C, Wei C, Chen S, Chen S, Jiang Z, Peng L, Cheng S, Xie J. Enabling superior electrochemical performances of Li10SnP2S12-based all-solid-state batteries using lithium halide electrolytes. Ceram Int. 2023;49(7):11485–11493.
Crossref Google Scholar
38

Zhang Z, Yao J, Yu C, Xu R, Ma J, Wei C, Peng L, Zhang L, Cheng S, Xie J. Failure analysis of the Ge-substituted Li6PS5I with bare LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 and performance improvement via Li2ZrO3 coating. J Mater Chem A. 2022;10(41):22155–22165.
Crossref Google Scholar
39

Peng L, Ren H, Zhang J, Chen S, Yu C, Miao X, Zhang Z, He Z, Yu M, Zhang L, et al. LiNbO3-coated LiNi0.7Co0.1Mn0.2O2 and chlorine-rich argyrodite enabling high-performance solid-state batteries under different temperatures. Energy Storage Mater. 2021;43:53–61.
Crossref Google Scholar
40

Strauss F, Teo JH, Maibach J, Kim AY, Mazilkin A, Janek J, Brezesinski T. Li2ZrO3-coated NCM622 for application in inorganic solid-state batteries: Role of surface carbonates in the cycling performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(51):57146–57154.
Crossref Google Scholar
41

Lee JS, Park YJ. Comparison of LiTaO3 and LiNbO3 surface layers prepared by post- and precursor-based coating methods for Ni-rich cathodes of all-solid-state batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(32):38333–38345.
Crossref Google Scholar
42

Wang X, Bai Y, Wang X, Wu C. High-voltage layered ternary oxide cathode materials: Failure mechanisms and modification methods. Chin J Chem. 2020;38(12):1847–1869.
Crossref Google Scholar
43

Wei C, Chen S, Yu C, Wang R, Luo Q, Chen S, Wu Z, Liu C, Cheng S, Xie J. Achieving high-performance Li6.5Sb0.5Ge0.5S5I-based all-solid-state lithium batteries. Appli Mater Today. 2023;31:Article 101770.
Crossref Google Scholar
44

Liao C, Yu C, Chen S, Wei C, Wu Z, Chen S, Jiang Z, Cheng S, Xie J. Mitigation of the instability of ultrafast Li-ion conductor Li6.6Si0.6Sb0.4S5I enables high-performance all-solid-state batteries. Renewables. 2023;1(2):266–276.
Crossref Google Scholar
45

Zhan X, Gao S, Cheng Y-T. Influence of annealing atmosphere on Li2ZrO3-coated LiNi0.6Co0.2Mn0.2O2 and its high-voltage cycling performance. Electrochim Acta. 2019;300:36–44.
Crossref Google Scholar
46
Hafner J, Kresse G. The Vienna Ab-Initio Simulation Program VASP: An efficient and versatile tool for studying the structural, dynamic, and electronic properties of materials. In: Gonis A, Meike A, Turchi PEA, editors. Properties of complex inorganic solids. Boston (MA): Springer; 1997. p. 69–82.
Crossref
47

Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77(18):3865–3868.
Crossref Google Scholar
48

Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys. 2010;132(15):Article 154104.
Crossref Google Scholar
49

Brant JA, Massi DM, Holzwarth NAW, MacNeil JH, Douvalis AP, Bakas T, Martin SW, Gross MD, Aitken JA. Fast lithium ion conduction in Li2SnS3: Synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and electronic structure. Chem Mater. 2014;27(1):189–196.
Crossref Google Scholar
50

Yu C, Ganapathy S, de Klerk NJ, Roslon I, van Eck ER, Kentgens AP, Wagemaker M. Unravelling Li-ion transport from picoseconds to seconds: Bulk versus interfaces in an Argyrodite Li6PS5Cl-Li2S all-solid-state Li-ion battery. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(35):11192–11201.
Crossref Google Scholar
51

Doren R, Panthofer M, Pradel L, Tremel W, Mondeshki M. Lithium confinement and dynamics in hexagonal and monoclinic tungsten oxide nanocrystals: A 7Li solid state NMR study. Nanoscale. 2022;14(41):15348–15363.
Crossref Google Scholar
52

Liang X, Yang L, Lei Y, Qu L, Wang L, Cai W, Xu K, Jiang Y, Liu B, Feng J. Selective blockage of Li-ion diffusion pathways in Li10SnP2S12: Insights from nuclear magnetic resonance. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125(50):27884–27890.
Crossref Google Scholar
53

Ong SP, Mo Y, Richards WD, Miara L, Lee HS, Ceder G. Phase stability, electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12(M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or se) family of superionic conductors. Energy Environ Sci. 2013;6(1):148–156.
Crossref Google Scholar
54

Zhang J, Li L, Zheng C, Xia Y, Gan Y, Huang H, Liang C, He X, Tao X, Zhang W. Silicon-doped Argyrodite solid electrolyte Li6PS5I with improved ionic conductivity and interfacial compatibility for high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(37):41538–41545.
Crossref Google Scholar
55

Wu F, Li Q, Chen L, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Lu Y, Bao L, Chen S, Su Y. Improving the structure stability of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 by surface perovskite-like La2Ni0.5Li0.5O4 self-assembling and subsurface La3+ doping. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(40):36751–36762.
Crossref Google Scholar
56

Koç T, Hallot M, Quemin E, Hennequart B, Dugas R, Abakumov AM, Lethien C, Tarascon J-M. Toward optimization of the chemical/electrochemical compatibility of halide solid electrolytes in all-solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2022;7(9):2979–2987.
Crossref Google Scholar
57

Rosenbach C, Walther F, Ruhl J, Hartmann M, Hendriks TA, Ohno S, Janek J, Zeier WG. Visualizing the chemical incompatibility of halide and sulfide-based electrolytes in solid-state batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;13(6):202203673.
Crossref Google Scholar
58

Koç T, Marchini F, Rousse G, Dugas R, Tarascon J-M. In search of the best solid electrolyte-layered oxide pairing for assembling practical all-solid-state batteries. ACS Appli Energy Mater. 2021;4(12):13575–13585.
Crossref Google Scholar
Energy Material Advances
Volume 4,
2023
Article number: 0065
DOI: 10.34133/energymatadv.0065
Cite this article:
Luo Q, Ming L, Zhang D, et al. Constructing Br-Doped Li10SnP2S12-Based All-Solid-State Batteries with Superior Performances. Energy Material Advances, 2023, 4: 0065. https://doi.org/10.34133/energymatadv.0065

77

Views

0

Downloads

51

Crossref

45

Web of Science

46

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics
Received: 19 July 2023
Accepted: 28 September 2023
Published: 18 October 2023
© 2023 Qiyue Luo et al. Exclusive licensee Beijing Institute of Technology Press. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY 4.0).
Return