AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (570.5 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs based on deep neural networks

State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, P. R. China
Fengcheng Oilfield Operation Area of PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, P. R. China
Heavy Oil Development Company of PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, P. R. China
Chengdu North Petroleum Exploration and Development Technology Company Limited, Chengdu 610051, P. R. China
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA
Show Author Information

Abstract

Accurate estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight reservoirs is crucial to economic evaluation and oil field development plan formulation. Advances in artificial intelligence and big data have provided a new tool for rapid production prediction of unconventional reservoirs. In this study, the estimated ultimate recovery prediction model based on deep neural networks was established using the data of 58 horizontal wells in Mahu tight oil reservoirs. First, the estimated ultimate recovery of oil wells was calculated based on the stretched exponential production decline model and a five-region flow model. Then, the calculated estimated ultimate recovery, geological attributes, engineering parameters, and production data of each well were used to build a machine learning database. Before the model training, the number of input parameters was reduced from 14 to 9 by feature selection. The prediction accuracy of the model was improved by data normalization, the early stopping technique, and 10-fold cross validation. The optimal activation function, hidden layers, number of neurons in each layer, and learning rate of the deep neural network model were obtained through hyperparameter optimization. The average determination coefficient on the testing set was 0.73. The results indicate that compared with the traditional estimated ultimate recovery prediction methods, the established deep neural network model has the strengths of a simple procedure and low time consumption, and the deep neural network model can be easily updated to improve prediction accuracy when new well information is obtained.

References

 
Aguilera, R. Flow units: From conventional to tight-gas to shale-gas to tight-oil to shale-oil reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2014, 17(2): 190-208.
 
Arlot, S., Alain, C. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics Surveys, 2010, 4: 40-79.
 
Arps, J. J. Analysis of decline curves. Transactions of the AIME, 1945, 160(1): 228-247.
 
Bansal, Y., Ertekin, T., Karpyn, Z., et al. Forecasting well performance in a discontinuous tight oil reservoir using artificial neural networks. Paper SPE 164542 Presented at SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Woodlands, Texas, USA, 10-12 April, 2013.
 
Boogar, A. S., Gerami, S., Masihi, M. Investigation into the capability of a modern decline curve analysis for gas condensate reservoirs. Scientia Iranica, 2011, 18(3): 491-501.
 
Bouwmans, T., Javed, S., Sultana, M., et al. Deep neural network concepts for background subtraction: A systematic review and comparative evaluation. Neural Networks, 2019, 117: 8-66.
 
Broni-Bediako, E., Fuseini, N. I., Akoto, R. N. A., et al. Application of intelligent well completion in optimising oil production from oil rim reservoirs. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2019, 3(4): 343-354.
 
Brown, M. L., Ozkan, E., Raghavan, R. S., et al. Practical solutions for pressure-transient responses of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional shale reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2009, 14(6): 663-676.
 
Cao, Q., Banerjee, R., Gupta, S., et al. Data driven production forecasting using machine learning. Paper SPE 180984 Presented at SPE Argentina Exploration & Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1-3 June, 2016.
 
Chen, J., Huang, H., Liu, J., et al. Production predicting technology of shale gas fracturing horizontal well in Changning area based on the GA-BP neural network model. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(5): 1851-1858. (in Chinese)
 
Clark, A. J., Lake, L. W., Patzek, T. W. Production forecasting with logistic growth models. Paper SPE 144790 Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 October-2 November, 2011.
 
Cui, Y., Jiang, R., Gao, Y. Blasingame decline analysis for multi-fractured horizontal well in tight gas reservoir with irregularly distributed and stress-sensitive fractures. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 88: 103830.
 
Dontsov, E. V., Suarez-Rivera, R. Propagation of multiple hydraulic fractures in different regimes. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2020, 128: 104270.
 
Duong, A. N. An unconventional rate decline approach for tight and fracture-dominated gas wells. Paper SPE 137748 Presented at Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19-21 October, 2010.
 
Fetkovich, M. J. Decline curve analysis using type curves. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1980, 32(6): 1065-1077.
 
Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3(3): 1157-1182.
 
Hinton, G. E., Salakhutdinov, R. R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 2006, 313: 504-507.
 
Hsieh, F. S., Vega, C., Vega, L. Applying a time-dependent Darcy equation for decline analysis for wells of varying reservoir type. Paper SPE 71036 Presented at SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 21-23 May, 2001.
 
Hughes, J. D. Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution. Nature, 2013, 494(7437): 307-308.
 
Ji, B. Some understandings on the development trend in research of oil and gas reservoir engineering methods. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1774-1778. (in Chinese)
 
Khan, M. A., Jani, S. P., Kumar, A. S., et al. Machining parameter optimization using Adam-Gene Algorithm while turning lightweight composite using ceramic cutting tools. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 2021, 4(2): 262-267.
 
Khamidullin, M., Mazo, A., Potashev, K. Numerical simulation of a one-phase steady flow towards a multistage fractured horizontal well. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 2017, 38(5): 818-826.
 
Kuang, L., Liu, H., Ren, Y., et al. Application and development trend of artificial intelligence in petroleum exploration and development. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 1-11.
 
Lee, K., Lim, J., Yoon, D., et al. Prediction of shale-gas production at duvernay formation using deep-learning algorithm. SPE Journal, 2019, 24(6): 2423-2437.
 
Li, G., Qin, J., Xian, C., et al. Theoretical understandings, key technologies and practices of tight conglomerate oilfield efficient development: A case study of the Mahu oilfield, Junggar Basin, NW China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1185-1197.
 
Liang, H., Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., et al. Empirical methods of decline-curve analysis for shale gas reservoirs: Review, evaluation, and application. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 83(5): 103531.
 
Liu, Y., Ma, X., Zhang, X., et al. A deep-learning-based prediction method of the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of shale gas wells. Petroleum Science, 2021, 18(5): 1450-1464.
 
Luo, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., et al. Integrated simulation for hydraulic fracturing, productivity prediction, and optimization in tight conglomerate reservoirs. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(18): 14658-14670.
 
Mattar, L., Mcneil, R. The flowing gas material balance. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1998, 37(2): 52-55.
 
Meng, M., Chen, Z., Liao, X., et al. A well-testing method for parameter evaluation of multiple fractured horizontal wells with non-uniform fractures in shale oil reservoirs. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2020, 4(2): 187-198.
 
Mohaghegh, S. D. Reservoir simulation and modeling based on artificial intelligence and data mining (AI&DM). Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2011, 3(6): 697-705.
 
Niu, W., Lu, J., Sun, Y. Development of shale gas production prediction models based on machine learning using early data. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 1229-1237.
 
Qin, J., Zhang, J., Jiang, Q., et al. Sweet spot classification evaluation of tight conglomerate reservoir in Mahu Sag and its engineering application. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2): 110-119. (in Chinese)
 
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., et al. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2014, 15(1): 1929-1958.
 
Stalgorova, E., Mattar, L. Analytical model for unconventional multifractured composite systems. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2013, 16(3): 246-256.
 
Valko, P. P. Assigning value to stimulation in the Barnett Shale: A simultaneous analysis of 7000 plus production histories and well completion records. Paper SPE 119369 Presented at SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 19-21 January, 2009.
 
Wang, K., Li, H., Wang, J., et al. Predicting production and estimated ultimate recoveries for shale gas wells: A new methodology approach. Applied Energy, 2017, 206: 1416-1431.
 
Wang, S., Chen, Z., Chen, S. Applicability of deep neural networks on production forecasting in Bakken shale reservoirs. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 179: 112-125.
 
Wood, D. A. Gamma-ray log derivative and volatility attributes assist facies characterization in clastic sedimentary sequences for formulaic and machine learning analysis. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2022, 6(1): 69-85.
 
Yavari, H., Khosravanian, R., Wood, D. A., et al. Application of mathematical and machine learning models to predict differential pressure of autonomous downhole inflow control devices. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(4): 386-406.
 
Zhou, Z. Machine learning. Beijing, China, Tsinghua University Press, 2016. (in Chinese)
Advances in Geo-Energy Research
Pages 111-122
Cite this article:
Luo S, Ding C, Cheng H, et al. Estimated ultimate recovery prediction of fractured horizontal wells in tight oil reservoirs based on deep neural networks. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2022, 6(2): 111-122. https://doi.org/10.46690/ager.2022.02.04

1415

Views

128

Downloads

22

Crossref

21

Web of Science

30

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 08 January 2022
Revised: 28 January 2022
Accepted: 29 January 2022
Published: 03 February 2022
© The Author(s) 2022.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Return