AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Dosimetric response of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD film to therapeutic protons

Fada Guan1,2Xiaochun Wang1Ming Yang1Emily Draeger2Dae Han2Kiminori Iga1,3Fanqing Guo2Luis Perles1Yuting Li1Narayan Sahoo1Radhe Mohan1 ( )Zhe Chen2( )
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Particle Therapy Division, Hitachi America, Ltd., Santa Clara, California, USA

Part of the work was conducted when the author worked at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The EBT-XD model of Gafchromic™ films has a broader optimal dynamic dose range, up to 40 Gy, compared with its predecessor models. This characteristic has made EBT-XD films suitable for high-dose applications, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, as well as ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy. The purpose of the current study was to characterize the dependence of EBT-XD film response on linear energy transfer (LET) and dose rate of therapeutic protons from a synchrotron. A clinical spot-scanning proton beam was used to study LET dependence at three dose-averaged LET values of 1.0 keV/μm, 3.6 keV/μm, and 7.6 keV/μm. A research proton beamline was used to study dose rate dependence at 150 Gy/s in the FLASH mode and 0.3 Gy/s in the non-FLASH mode. Film response data from dose-averaged LET values of 0.9 keV/μm and 9.0 keV/μm of the proton FLASH beam were also compared. Film response data from a clinical 6-MV photon beam were used as a reference. Both the gray value method and optical density (OD) method were used in film calibration. Calibration results using a specific OD calculation method and a generic OD calculation method were compared. The four-parameter NIH Rodbard function and three-parameter rational function were compared in fitting the calibration curves. Experimental results showed that the response of EBT-XD film is proton LET dependent, but independent of dose rate. Goodness-of-fit analysis showed that using the NIH Rodbard function is superior for both protons and photons. Using the "specific OD + NIH Rodbard function" method for EBT-XD film calibration is recommended.

References

1

Niroomand-Rad A, Chiu-Tsao ST, Grams MP, et al. Report of AAPM task group 235 radiochromic film dosimetry: an update to TG-55. Med Phys. 2020;47(12):5986-6025.

2

Brown TA, Hogstrom KR, Alvarez D, Matthews KL 2nd, Ham K, Dugas JP. Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams. Med Phys. 2012;39(12):7412-7417.

3

Mohan R. A review of proton therapy -current status and future directions. Precis Radiat Oncol. 2022;6(2):164-176.

4

Mohan R, Titt U, Guan F. Particle therapy in the third millennium: current status and future outlook. Particle Radiother. 2016: 7-19.

5

International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Report 85: fundamental quantities and units for ionizing radiation. J ICRU. 2011;11(1):1-31.

6

Mairani A, Mein S, Blakely E, et al. Roadmap: helium ion therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67(15). 10.1088/1361-6560/ac65d3

7

Guan F, Geng C, Carlson DJ, et al. A mechanistic relative biological effectiveness model-based biological dose optimization for charged particle radiobiology studies. Phys Med Biol. 2018;64(1):015008.

8

Newhauser WD, Zhang R. The physics of proton therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(8):R155-R209.

9

Perles LA, Mirkovic D, Anand A, Titt U, Mohan R. LET dependence of the response of EBT2 films in proton dosimetry modeled as a bimolecular chemical reaction. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(23):8477-8491.

10

Reinhardt S, Würl M, Greubel C, et al. Investigation of EBT2 and EBT3 films for proton dosimetry in the 4–20 MeV energy range. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2015;54(1):71-79.

11

Niroomand-Rad A, Blackwell CR, Coursey BM, et al. Radiochromic film dosimetry: recommendations of AAPM radiation therapy committee task group 55. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Med Phys. 1998;25(11):2093-2115.

12

Soares CG. Radiochromic film dosimetry. Radiat Meas. 2006;41: S100-S116.

13

Karsch L, Beyreuther E, Burris-Mog T, et al. Dose rate dependence for different dosimeters and detectors: TLD, OSL, EBT films, and diamond detectors. Med Phys. 2012;39(5):2447-2455.

14
Favaudon V, Caplier L, Monceau V, et al. Ultrahigh dose-rate FLASH irradiation increases the differential response between normal and tumor tissue in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(245):245ra93. published correction appears in Sci Transl Med. 2019 Dec 18;11(523):.
15

Cavallone M, Gonçalves Jorge P, Moeckli R, et al. Determination of the ion collection efficiency of the Razor Nano Chamber for ultra-high dose-rate electron beams. Med Phys. 2022;49(7):4731-4742.

16

Petersson K, Jaccard M, Germond JF, et al. High dose-per-pulse electron beam dosimetry - A model to correct for the ion recombination in the Advanced Markus ionization chamber. Med Phys. 2017;44(3):1157-1167.

17

Villoing D, Koumeir C, Bongrand A, et al. Technical note: proton beam dosimetry at ultra-high dose rates (FLASH):evaluation of GAFchromic™ (EBT3, EBT-XD) and OrthoChromic (OC-1) film performances. Med Phys. 2022;49(4):2732-2745.

18

Diffenderfer ES, Verginadis II, Kim MM, et al. Design, Implementation, and in Vivo Validation of a Novel Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy System. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106(2):440-448.

19

Gillin MT, Sahoo N, Bues M, et al. Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston. Med Phys. 2010;37(1):154-163.

20

Andreo P, Burns DT, Hohlfeld K, et al. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water; Technical Reports Series No. 398. Health physics. 2001;81: 592-593.

21

Yang M, Wang X, Guan F, et al. Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67(16). 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8269

22

Titt U, Yang M, Wang X, et al. Design and validation of a synchrotron proton beam line for FLASH radiotherapy preclinical research experiments. Med Phys. 2022;49(1):497-509.

23

Wang Q, Titt U, Mohan R, et al. Optimization of FLASH proton beams using a track-repeating algorithm. Med Phys. 2022;49(10):6684-6698.

24

Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, et al. Recent developments in Geant4. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2016;835: 186-225.

25
Guan F, Peeler C, Bronk L, et al. Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code. Med Phys. 2015;42(11):6234-6247. published correction appears in Med Phys. 2018 Mar; 45(3):1302.
26

Guan F, Bronk L, Titt U, et al. Spatial mapping of the biologic effectiveness of scanned particle beams: towards biologically optimized particle therapy. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 9850.

27

Guan F, Geng C, Ma D, et al. RBE Model-Based Biological Dose Optimization for Proton Radiobiology Studies. Int J Part Ther. 2018;5(1):160-171.

28

Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999;26(9):1847-1870.

29

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671-675.

30

Howard ME, Herman MG, Grams MP. Methodology for radiochromic film analysis using FilmQA Pro and ImageJ. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233562.

Precision Radiation Oncology
Pages 15-26
Cite this article:
Guan F, Wang X, Yang M, et al. Dosimetric response of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD film to therapeutic protons. Precision Radiation Oncology, 2023, 7(1): 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1187

403

Views

8

Crossref

8

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 24 October 2022
Revised: 06 January 2023
Accepted: 08 January 2023
Published: 02 March 2023
© 2023 The Authors. Precision Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shandong Cancer Hospital & Institute.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Return