AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Editorial | Open Access

Editorial: Innovations, advances, and challenges in precision radiation oncology physics

Fada Guan1Lawrence Bronk2Jinbo Yue3Radhe Mohan2 ( )Zhe Chen1( )
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, P.R. China
Show Author Information

References

1

Chatzipapas KP, Tran NH, Dordevic M, et al. “Simulation of DNA damage using Geant4-DNA: an overview of the “molecularDNA” example application.” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:4-14.

2

Allison J, Amako K, Apostolakis J, et al. “Recent developments in Geant4.” Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2016;835:186-225.

3

Incerti S, Baldacchino G, Bernal M, et al. “The geant4-dna project.” Int J Model Simul Sc. 2010;1:157-178.

4

Guan F, Wang X, Yang M, et al. “Dosimetric response of Gafchromic™ EBT-XD film to therapeutic protons.” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:15-26.

5

Yang M, Wang X, Guan F, et al. “Adaptation and dosimetric commissioning of a synchrotron-based proton beamline for FLASH experiments.” Phys Med Biol. 2022;67:165002.

6

Ferrone KL, Willis CE, Guan F, Ma J, Peterson LE, Kry SF. “Evaluating bone marrow dosimetry with the addition of bone marrow structures to the medical internal radiation dose phantom.” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:27-35.

7

Chen M, Cao W, Yepes P, et al. “Impact of dose calculation accuracy on inverse linear energy transfer optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:36-44.

8

Guan F, Asai M, Bartkoski DA, Kleckner M, Harel Ze, Salehpour M. “Adding the X-ray Bragg reflection physical process in crystal to the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit, part Ⅰ: reflection from a crystal slab.” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:59-66.

9

Bartkoski DA, Bar-David A, Kleckner M, et al. “Analysis of a novel X-ray lens for converging beam radiotherapy.” Sci Rep. 2021;11:19180.

10

Waheed A, Banerjee R, Meyer T, et al. “Clinical outcomes after salvage external beam radiotherapy combined with interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced, recurrent endometrial cancer.” Precision Radiation Oncology. 2023;7:45-50.

11

Kiladze I, Chkhaidze L, Iovashvili A, et al. “Definitive chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: Safety and outcome,” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:51-58.

12

Yu CX. “Radiotherapy of early-stage breast cancer.” Prec Radiat Oncol. 2023;7:67-79.

Precision Radiation Oncology
Pages 222-224
Cite this article:
Guan F, Bronk L, Yue J, et al. Editorial: Innovations, advances, and challenges in precision radiation oncology physics. Precision Radiation Oncology, 2023, 7(4): 222-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1216

108

Views

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Altmetrics

Received: 17 November 2023
Accepted: 20 November 2023
Published: 29 December 2023
© 2023 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Return