Cooperative driving is widely viewed as a promising method to better utilize limited road resources and alleviate traffic congestion. In recent years, several cooperative driving approaches for idealized traffic scenarios (i.e., uniform vehicle arrivals, lengths, and speeds) have been proposed. However, theoretical analyses and comparisons of these approaches are lacking. In this study, we propose a unified group-by-group zipper-style movement model to describe different approaches synthetically and evaluate their performance. We derive the maximum throughput for cooperative driving plans of idealized unsignalized intersections and discuss how to minimize the delay of vehicles. The obtained conclusions shed light on future cooperative driving studies.

Virtual simulation testing of Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) is gradually being accepted as a mandatory way to test the feasibility of driving strategies for AVs. Mainstream methods focus on improving testing efficiency by extracting critical scenarios from naturalistic driving datasets. However, the criticalities defined in their testing tasks are based on fixed assumptions, the obtained scenarios cannot pose a challenge to AVs with different strategies. To fill this gap, we propose an intelligent testing method based on operable testing tasks. We found that the driving behavior of Surrounding Vehicles (SVs) has a critical impact on AV, which can be used to adjust the testing task difficulty to find more challenging scenarios. To model different driving behaviors, we utilize behavioral utility functions with binary driving strategies. Further, we construct a vehicle interaction model, based on which we theoretically analyze the impact of changing the driving behaviors on the testing task difficulty. Finally, by adjusting SV’s strategies, we can generate more corner cases when testing different AVs in a finite number of simulations.